Jump to content

Enforced Water Meters


Penguin68

Recommended Posts

I have just received a letter/ pack from Thames Water saying that they now have a statutory right to force all households (presumably in London) to have smart water meters - whether they want one or not.


Whilst I have nothing against actions which will help conserve water, it is a bit rich that the largest single waster of water locally - Thames Water with its horrendous history of leaks - should now be able to enforce what will almost certainly be higher charges to line the pockets of their owners at the expense of London householders.


The old water rates had some oversight, but these charges, which will be based on Thames' interpretation of usage, will be open ended and uncapped (and will be unilaterally imposed within 12 months of the meters being fitted). Of course some people will reduce their usage, by washing less (them and their clothes) or other economies - but this sort of open ended-pillage (particularly when other prices are soaring as well) - and by a company which is notoriously wasteful and inefficient (how many times locally do they shut roads to 'repair' exactly the same stretches of pipe?) does seem unacceptable, at least to me it does.


Water rates were one of the few charges which were predictable - you knew at the beginning of each fiscal what the monthly pain would be - but now we have a foreign owned monopoly (it is owned by Kemble Water Holdings Ltd, a consortium formed in late 2006 and formerly owned by Australian-based Macquarie Group's European Infrastructure Funds specifically for the purpose of purchasing Thames Water) able to charge effectively what it wants.


There is nothing, of course, that we can do about this - but did this come as much as a surprise to other ED-ers as it did to me, or have I just been asleep whilst it happened around me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe advantage is that you won't waste water. Using more than you need not only wastes the water itself but also the power needed to clean it up, etc. I think you will save money because you will be using only what you need and will be mindful of waste though I can understand that being told by Thames Water that it doesn't like waste is a bit annoying. (At least, though, this move is proof it wants to reduce wastage.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least, though, this move is proof it wants to reduce wastage.


No, it's proof it wants access to uncapped and open ended charging. All the research suggests that providing access to detailed usage information (for power or water) makes an alteration in year 1 or so to usage, but this soon changes and reverts back to normal habits. The reason why our area is perceived to be at water risk is substantially down to Thames Water's inability to manage its supply well (i.e. keep it in the pipes). And it is by no means clear that the impact of climate change on the UK will necessarily be to reduce the amounts of water falling on our islands. This may actually increase. In which case the issue may well be about run-off and not water meters. The water is better conserved if the rain gets to water tables and aquifers for storage, rather than not. Not using impermeable stone or concrete in drives and back gardens (in London) may have a far greater impact (and gravel and permeable linings are far cheaper than stone, at least). And that's nothing to do with Thames Water or lining their coffers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one such "smart meter" which was fitted 18 months ago and my charges have been based solely on the amount of water used, so far there has been no indication that the costs are being determined by peak or off peak timings. I guess this is a possibility bearing in mind the recent press reports of how some energy companies (OK, three so far) are intending to alter the costs throughout the day.


I suspect Thames Water are using this is one way of reducing the "costs" of a man coming twice a year to read the water meter in the pavement, very similar to the way energy meter readers of gas and electricity are being slowly phased out. How often do you see one and if you do, they are not from your energy company, but have been sub contracted out to a third party who "specialise" in meter reading. Arghhhhhhhhhhh.


So yes, water meters are being made "smart"


And avoid a smart energy meter unless you want a bill that may charge you a different rate up to 48 times a day. In last Thursday's Daily Telegraph (no, it's not my daily paper) it was the neighbours after I saw the front banner about how a journalist objected to energy smart meters (well worth a read).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd also received that letter and was surprised. Wondered if they were overstating powers and was going to look into it.



Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have just received a letter/ pack from Thames

> Water saying that they now have a statutory right

> to force all households (presumably in London) to

> have smart water meters - whether they want one or

> not.

>

> Whilst I have nothing against actions which will

> help conserve water, it is a bit rich that the

> largest single waster of water locally - Thames

> Water with its horrendous history of leaks -

> should now be able to enforce what will almost

> certainly be higher charges to line the pockets of

> their owners at the expense of London

> householders.

>

> The old water rates had some oversight, but these

> charges, which will be based on Thames'

> interpretation of usage, will be open ended and

> uncapped (and will be unilaterally imposed within

> 12 months of the meters being fitted). Of course

> some people will reduce their usage, by washing

> less (them and their clothes) or other economies -

> but this sort of open ended-pillage (particularly

> when other prices are soaring as well) - and by a

> company which is notoriously wasteful and

> inefficient (how many times locally do they shut

> roads to 'repair' exactly the same stretches of

> pipe?) does seem unacceptable, at least to me it

> does.

>

> Water rates were one of the few charges which were

> predictable - you knew at the beginning of each

> fiscal what the monthly pain would be - but now we

> have a foreign owned monopoly (it is owned by

> Kemble Water Holdings Ltd, a consortium formed in

> late 2006 and formerly owned by Australian-based

> Macquarie Group's European Infrastructure Funds

> specifically for the purpose of purchasing Thames

> Water) able to charge effectively what it wants.

>

> There is nothing, of course, that we can do about

> this - but did this come as much as a surprise to

> other ED-ers as it did to me, or have I just been

> asleep whilst it happened around me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought they would give you the option to install a water meter but maybe that has now changed as they know people are wise to the fact that a house with more than a couple of people in it will likely end-up paying more. The advice from folks like Martin Lewis has been don't do it unless you have more bedrooms than people in the house so maybe Thames Water is taking the option away and looking to raise revenue on the back of it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And avoid a smart energy meter unless you want a bill that may charge you a different rate up to 48 times a day.


There is no option, according to the bumf.


I suspect Thames Water are using this is one way of reducing the "costs" of a man coming twice a year to read the water meter in the pavement


Most people have NO water meter - they are charged based on their rateable value only. So no cost (or indeed accuracy) savings here - for most households there is no meter to read.


I would add that if they plan to be able to turn-off the water remotely - as they can with smart gas and electricity meters, then you may shortly expect a friendly North Korean or Russian to do precisely that - either to hold Thames water to ransom (but I bet their foreign owners won't pay) or as an act of aggression. And it will be bottled water all round then, as there won't be the man power to manually override the electronic off switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This from the article above


This will hopefully go some way to dealing with a predicted water shortage of around 387 million litres of water a day in the London area by 2045, which is expected to get worse with time increasing to 688 million litres of water a day by 2100 (a quarter of the water Thames Water currently supply!). The choice is either to ship a lot of water to London from the north at great expense (think huge pipelines, reservoirs and pumping stations), or to push out meters to get us to use it more efficiently. And it seems we all use less water when we?re billed for it by the cubic metre (Thames Water reckon water use goes down by twelve percent).


That said, there is another thing Thames Water can do: reduce the number of leaks in their ageing water network! In February this year they lost a staggering 732 million litres of water every day to leaks (which is rather more than the total predicted daily water shortfall in 2100). It?s a big and difficult job: in the same month they repaired 4,568 leaks, but realistically a lot of London?s pipework apart from the really major water mains is a creaking mess of lead and ancient cast iron and needs a major upgrade, and Thames Water have consistently missed their leak reduction targets.


Note that there is more leaking daily from their pipes now than they anticipate they will need by 2100!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- a third of TW?s network in London is over 100 years old, hence the volume of leakage. It would be uneconomic to replace all pipes with plastic pipes overnight. Nobody expects a water company to achieve zero leakage in the short term, that would be impossible


- water meters are essential for reducing consumption and stress on scarce water resources. This remains true regardless of the above point. As a metered customer you cannot be cut off from your water supply.


- water companies cannot charge whatever they like. Tariffs are set by Ofwat and companies have no discretion to charge what they like to customers


- there is no Russian or North Korean ownership of UK water infrastructure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is no Russian or North Korean ownership of UK water infrastructure


It would be a very strange hacker that decided to hack something they owned. At the moment our 'smart' systems are very open to cyber attack - the neatest of which is to switch-off supply to individual addresses, which the smart systems do support (I have contacts in the power industry who confirm this). Hospitals, schools, energy suppliers and private companies have all been attacked by ransomware, most attackers being based in e.g. North Korea and Russia, although many of the Russian ones are probably simply criminal gangs and not state agents.


Almost certainly these would need to be individually switched back on again, particularly if the underlying code was taken over by ransomware. Smart meters are communicating IT, based in your premises and impacting your supply, over which you have no control - you cannot password these wifi hubs which belong, and are fully in the control of, your supplier - or whoever is now controlling your supplier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 Wrote:

--------------------------------------------- now we

> have a foreign owned monopoly... able to charge effectively what it wants.


1) OFWAT regulates water prices in this country. Thames Water can't charge what it wants.


2) it's not like HBOS/Virgin/Capita would treat you any better. If you like your capitalism wrapped in a St George's Cross and wearing a bowler hat, that's up up you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> THe advantage is that you won't waste water. Using

> more than you need not only wastes the water

> itself but also the power needed to clean it up,

> etc. I think you will save money because you will

> be using only what you need and will be mindful of

> waste though I can understand that being told by

> Thames Water that it doesn't like waste is a bit

> annoying. (At least, though, this move is proof it

> wants to reduce wastage.)


How do you know when you are wasting water? You might but others might not. Seems these days the powers that be seem to know how people live or what they really need.


It does seem these days people are being rounded up and pushed into things they have not been consulted on or want.


Still shareholders are the people that have to be kept happy and repairs to fix wastage is not high on the agenda if if requires monies to be paid out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water meters have been with us for 35+ plus years, smart water meters are new technology. I appreciate that P68 is not on a water meter and probably does not want a smart water meter. People have had a long time to adapt, as I said previously, I've had a smart water meter for probably 18+ months and so far no problem.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smart meters measure how much water you are using so you can manage your usage (and bill) while helping the environment. The UK water system is a pressurised network relying on basic physics. Double check with your contacts, they will confirm that there is no possibility of a Russian (or other country) cyber attack affecting your water supply or waste water treatment
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a third of TW?s network in London is over 100 years old, hence the volume of leakage. It would be uneconomic to replace all pipes with plastic pipes overnight. Nobody expects a water company to achieve zero leakage in the short term, that would be impossible


Completely agreed, but the volume of leakage is increased substantially by TW's shoddy approach to repairs and to the major works they undertake. Take the replacement of the pipe and water main along Melford and Underhill earlier this year - a 4 week planned job took over 3 months because Thames Water cracked the gas pipe and gas main serving about 30 households in their repair works (so most of us had no gas and central heating for 5 days).


Let's be charitable and say the gas main was old too and it wasn't their fault.


But guess how many times they have been back to repair the brand new water pipe they put in less than 9 months ago?


At least 5 times that I am aware of, including one repair which left the road in such a bad condition (protruding access cover, which was still leaking) that it was really dangerous to cars and cycles. Southwark actually came and fixed that one as an emergency and back charged it to Thames Water.


So I'm all for giving them a break on the number of pipes to be replaced and repairs to be made. I just wish they would do a proper job and not a bodge/patch it up and get the hell out of dodge approach they seem to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My water bill went down a lot when I moved to a meter, even though I resisted having a meter as long as I could. The only problem was that the mains sprung a leak between the meter and my boundary, so there was a lot of arguing with the water company about the responsibility for the cost of the water, but they paid up eventually.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it would give people a better idea if you could tell what sort of property you live in, how many people, adults and children mlive in it and if you have a garden.


If it?s only you it is pretty useless give the above


I think it is yet another nose led rip off by companies who only have their shareholders in mind. As long as green comes into it people will follow like sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the concern is the mast being so close to a school as well?
    • There is a planning application to put a mobile phone mast at the top of Dog Kennel Hill.  Residents of Camberwell Grove and their friends in the Camberwell Society are fighting it - defacing their nice conservation area with ugly laminated posters!  They do not benefit from it as reception is fine on their side of the hill. https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=S9IKT2KBN1200 I do not think there are any health hazards from being near phone masts (or at least they are negligible relative to everyday risks we all face).  Anyway, here is what the NHS has to say about them: https://111.wales.nhs.uk/encyclopaedia/m/article/mobilephonesafety/#Risks I imagine this will spark some lively debate!        
    • Hi Laura, Thank you for your interest. I only walk 2 dogs at a time and your mum’s little one will be walking with my own 12 year old  Tibetan/poodle cross(send you her picture) and I charge £20 p/walk, pick up and drop. If it’s from Monday to Friday then we can talk and see what’s best for both of us. Sometimes if the weather is good we can stay at the park a bit longer than a hour…😊 I can only start the walks from Monday April 8th. Thank you, regards  M  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...