Jump to content

Lime bikes (and other hire companies) left in middle of pavement


first mate

Recommended Posts

I can see that the urge to populate road space with parked bikes might be a very attractive option for some, in that it further reduces car parking space. But, those with motorbikes tend to care about how they are parked, not least to reduce damage to the property they own.


Seeing the way hire bike users are leaving the bikes and scooters randomly strewn around I think leaving them in the road might create more negatives than positives. Of course, much depends on the ability of those using the bikes to behave like grownups and less like toddlers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised that Southwark Council hasn’t taken this opportunity to raise more funds. Surely if people can be fined for driving through cameras at the wrong time, netting £6 million in one year, fining Lime every day their scooters and bikes are left strewn along the pavement can be another revenue stream.

Goose Green councillors use this forum, could one of them respond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FROM MONOCLE 16/08/22 NB Westminster council


Walking in London has become particularly unbearable in recent weeks – and it’s not just because of the rising temperatures. It seems as though the £20m (€23.5m) that e-scooter and e-bike company Lime invested in the British capital this year is finally bearing fruit. There are more riders, sure, but also more pavements blocked by these micromobility “solutions” left carelessly in the middle of thoroughfares, creating an obstacle course for pedestrians, particularly those with prams or in wheelchairs. And while I’m certainly not against increasing the number of e-bikes and (dare I say it) e-scooters on our streets to encourage people out of cars, users’ seeming inability to park them without making footpaths unpassable presents a major issue.



London isn’t alone here: cities from Madrid to Minneapolis are dealing with the same problem but who has the solution? Well, this week, Westminster council began seizing “nuisance” bikes that are left strewn across its streets. I welcome this move but I don’t think it should be the responsibility of local councils to clean up the mess: micromobility companies need to step up. Holding them accountable would be a good first move: if a Lime bike (or similar) is parked incorrectly, the company should be fined in the same way that a car owner might.


New York might be rolling out the infrastructure that will allow this to happen. The state legislature is currently working on a bill that will see cameras introduced to discourage cars from parking illegally in bike lanes, ensuring that those who ride have safe passage. Could there not be capacity for e-scooters and e-bikes littering footpaths to be policed by the cameras too? The logic stacks up: if cities and councils in the US, UK and Europe are intent on ensuring that people can cycle securely and comfortably, why not guarantee that they can walk that way too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised that Southwark Council hasn’t taken this opportunity to raise more funds. Surely if people can be fined for driving through cameras at the wrong time, netting £6 million in one year, fining Lime every day their scooters and bikes are left strewn along the pavement can be another revenue stream.

Goose Green councillors use this forum, could one of them respond?

 

The council is already making money from the trials - this is where, and why, it gets a bit sticky for the council as they are encouraging these providers to be part of the trial and the providers have to pay for the privilege so it makes if difficult for the council to then say - please don't dump e-scooters as you try to win the trial by carpet bombing your branded e-scooters everywhere whether people are using them or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The council is already making money from the trials - this is where, and why, it gets a bit sticky for the council as they are encouraging these providers to be part of the trial and the providers have to pay for the privilege so it makes if difficult for the council to then say - please don't dump e-scooters as you try to win the trial by carpet bombing your branded e-scooters everywhere whether people are using them or not.

Suppose i rent my spare room to a lodger. I am "making a killing"out of the rent. This doesn't stop me telling him "do not sprawl in the garden".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure that is the answer. If, despite marked areas on the pavement, bikes are just left lying around surely the same will happen on the road.

 

There aren't marked spaces on the pavement for hire bikes. Only for the scooters. Hire bikes can be left anywhere. If every street had a couple of marked bays in the road specifically for hire bikes, and you were fined by the bike provider for not leaving them in a bay (as with the scooters), then this would largely solve the problem. You have to have enough bays though, otherwise the bikes lose their usefulness / convenience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or just issue fines for leaving a bike lying across a pavement or road. There are possibly enough community/ parking wardens doing their ticketing rounds as well as CCTV cars to make the odd fine viable? You just need enough of a deterrent to make hirers think twice about where they are leaving the bike and whether it is a sensible choice. Who or what is stopping a cycle hirer leaving their cycle parked neatly on the road... nothing really, no need for special bays.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are making money from the e-scooter trial - there is a cost involved for each company to be involved in the trial and then I believe once the winners are selected they will pay the council for the privilege of running the service/having access to the streets for parking of the e-scooters. Pretty sure the bike providers will do the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. You are confusing two issues: scooters and bikes. There is no trial or special licensing regime for the bikes. The hire bikes are just like any other bikes in the world - they don't have to be parked in specific locations.


But none of this is difficult. The council just has to enforce the existing laws that prevent people blocking pavements - with bikes, scooters, A-frames, skips, whatever.


If there is a procedural problem with fining the owners of badly parked bikes or scooters instead of riders: they should fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It's the selfish, thoughtless, dumb, inconsiderate morons that use these bikes and leave them in the most inconvenient places who need prosecuting.

If you use one of these bikes, don't just dump it and leave it up so someone else has to get the bike moved because you are a selfish moron and sort out your mess because you are a lazy so and so.

These bikes which cause or create an obstruction should be crushed."


Lime bikes

Contact number 0800 808 5223

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've suddenly noticed an influx of these Lime bikes and scooters left everywhere in the North Dulwich/Denmark Hill area. Early one morning last week there were 4 or 5 of the things left in a stretch of pavement outside a few houses in the area and then more all around the Red Post Hill/Casino Avenue area.


It's not acceptable and just creates more street litter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the selfish, thoughtless, dumb, inconsiderate morons that use these bikes and leave them in the most inconvenient places who need prosecuting.

...

Lime bikes

Contact number 0800 808 5223

Not as simple as that. If there are 4-5 of them dumped in one place, it's probably not renters but Lime's own operatives that have left them there. As far as I can see, they're flinging them out of a van a few of a time. I have seen them dumped right on the bobbled flagstones of zebra crossing etc. This is a problem created by the rental companies.


What do you think actually happens if you call that number to complain about badly parked bikes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the selfish, thoughtless, dumb, inconsiderate morons that use these bikes and leave them in the most inconvenient places who need prosecuting.

...

Lime bikes

Contact number 0800 808 5223

Not as simple as that. If there are 4-5 of them dumped in one place, it's probably not renters but Lime's own operatives that have left them there. As far as I can see, they're flinging them out of a van a few of a time. I have seen them dumped right on the bobbled flagstones of zebra crossing etc. This is a problem created by the rental companies.


What do you think actually happens if you call that number to complain about badly parked bikes?

 

Did that just yesterday and following regular postings about the issue and calling the number the bike was removed, job done, success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the selfish, thoughtless, dumb, inconsiderate morons that use these bikes and leave them in the most inconvenient places who need prosecuting.

...

Lime bikes

Contact number 0800 808 5223

Not as simple as that. If there are 4-5 of them dumped in one place, it's probably not renters but Lime's own operatives that have left them there. As far as I can see, they're flinging them out of a van a few of a time. I have seen them dumped right on the bobbled flagstones of zebra crossing etc. This is a problem created by the rental companies.


What do you think actually happens if you call that number to complain about badly parked bikes?

 

Did that just yesterday and following regular postings about the issue and calling the number the bike was removed, job done, success.

 

That's encouraging, well done. Too bad you had to do it in the first place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the concern is the mast being so close to a school as well?
    • There is a planning application to put a mobile phone mast at the top of Dog Kennel Hill.  Residents of Camberwell Grove and their friends in the Camberwell Society are fighting it - defacing their nice conservation area with ugly laminated posters!  They do not benefit from it as reception is fine on their side of the hill. https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=S9IKT2KBN1200 I do not think there are any health hazards from being near phone masts (or at least they are negligible relative to everyday risks we all face).  Anyway, here is what the NHS has to say about them: https://111.wales.nhs.uk/encyclopaedia/m/article/mobilephonesafety/#Risks I imagine this will spark some lively debate!        
    • Hi Laura, Thank you for your interest. I only walk 2 dogs at a time and your mum’s little one will be walking with my own 12 year old  Tibetan/poodle cross(send you her picture) and I charge £20 p/walk, pick up and drop. If it’s from Monday to Friday then we can talk and see what’s best for both of us. Sometimes if the weather is good we can stay at the park a bit longer than a hour…😊 I can only start the walks from Monday April 8th. Thank you, regards  M  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...