Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Citizens of Dulwich, I got a penalty charge notice in the badlands of Clapham earlier even though I had a pay and display ticket....I am sure I was parked in an area non-residents could park. Anyway, after effing and blinding I saw that the muppet had typed out my registration number incorrectly. The Which website says this error makes the ticket null and void. What to do? Does anyone know if that is correct? Unfortunately, Which does not say what to do? Write to the council telling them the error or just leaving it? Was thinking of writing to Lambeth council without stating my real name nor my address, with said pay and display ticket attached. Any legal advice would be welcome.

If they have someone else's registration number on record then they won't be able to contact you. For all you know you have been given a ticket for another vehicle. Forget about it and spend the ?40 on something nice.


[edited once] Added: obviously that's not legal advice.

Just my opinion: don't do anything until you receive a formal notice through the post - the chances are the DVLC search (for the driver's details) will reveal the error at the Council's end leading to the ticket being cancelled.


If any correspondence arises - mark your letters "Without Prejudice save as to costs." and make no admissions therein.

Tony - so sorry don't know the legalities of this but I concur with the others, if its the wrong registration on the penalty charge notice then it shouldn't apply to you/your vehicle! I would simply ignore it as doubt if they can issue a charge based on this. Good luck and stay away from the badlands of Clapham :)
A number of years ago I was summoned to South Western Magistrates Court having been charged with obstruction by a Police Officer. The officer demanded my name and address, which I gave him.I attended the court and the charge was read out. The registration number on the summons was incorrect by one letter. The Magistrate asked if I had anything to say and I explained that the registration number was incorrect, I had no entitlement to drive the vehichle named on the summons, nor had I ever driven the car on the summons.He asked me for the registration of the car I was driving and asked where it was. I explained it was parked in a road near the courthouse. The case was dismissed. I asked for costs for my time and received ?6.00.

I think the consensus is to ignore it. In fact I just bumped into a traffic warden and asked him what to do. He just laughed and said forget it. Once DVLA says it's not the car they think it is, they will just bin it, even though they have a photo, which is only supporting evidence apparently.

BTW Hal9000, can you please explain to me what "Without Prejudice save as to costs" means?

Thanks all for your posts.

TonyQuinn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BTW Hal9000, can you please explain to me what

> "Without Prejudice save as to costs" means?


I am not a lawyer: my understanding is that a letter marked "Without Prejudice" cannot be used as evidence in any subsequent court action against one. Adding "save as to costs" means that one can use the letter at the end of any such action to claim (or avoid) costs by showing that efforts were made to settle the matter before it went to court.


I think it also puts the other side on notice that the writer is a force to be reckoned with - which may persuade them not to proceed unless they have a cast-iron case.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about changing hands but the Peckham Rye one is open and hasn’t had any random closures. Our child is very happy there but there was a resolved Ofsted complaint half way through last year.  Things don’t look good for the Devon nursery owned by the same company - looks like loads of issues with Ofsted which can be seen in its latest report. 
    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...