Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For anyone interested in the government's proposals to change the rules on upward extensions, I have attached a link:


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/501191/Consultation_on_Upward_Extensions_in_London.pdf


Deadline for responses 15 April 2016

Thanks Noelwd for posting that.


I wonder if Southwark Council planning officers, or Planning Committee members, will read it. It includes a reminder that they are supposed to follow the London Plan.


?1.14 Boroughs? local development documents have to be ?in general conformity? with the London Plan, which is also legally part of the development plan, and in accordance with which a planning application must be determined in any part of London, unless there are material planning reasons why it should not.?


There have been a series of 4 storey approvals in East Dulwich, within the Suburban Zone, which the London Plan Policy 3.4 (and Table 3.2) Defines as 2-3 storeys. The density in those approvals accordingly exceeds the London Plan Policy. In each case, the officers report makes no mention of that Policy even when it is specifically cited by objectors.


Two of those recent approvals are for upward extensions, a fourth storey to an existing building ? Crown House and the former Iceland building. I think that neither would qualify for consideration under the new proposal.


?2.9 We are proposing a new permitted development right in London to allow additional storeys to be built on an existing building, up to the height of an adjoining roofline.?


The Crown House addition was described as a ?third floor?, and was approved by officers. Within days the 4 storey height was cited by officers as a precedent to justify 4 storeys for the nearby Crystal Palace Road factory site. In each case officers made no mention of London Plan Policy 3.4.


I wonder if Southwark Council will contribute to the consultation. Perhaps to share experience over the former Iceland site.


?2.4 We would welcome views from developers and local planning authorities on their experience of securing planning permission for this type of development, and what the key considerations were in developing and implementing their proposals to build upwards.?


MarkT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That’s called sticking up for britain   its people who think Brexit is a good thing - even now - that are anti-british   and thick 
    • Yes, I think people who don’t use their food waste bin are less likely to vote Lib Dem or Green or Labour as they think it’s a woke type of thing to do, like solar panels and other renewables. 
    • But we’re not in Canada so why celebrate their recent election? Wasn’t their winner our Bank of England director up until his defection to his homeland of Canada? He caused chaos  in this country with his put down of everything British and his many dismal words about the effects of Brexit on this country.
    • I expect that they consider it should be a free choice what to do with your waste, and that segregating it is a waste of money, no doubt it's all a woke conspiracy.  I expect that others are more up to speed with Reform policies. I should have asked Nigel when I was drinking with him.  Well within the vicinity of him in Westminster pubs a couple of times.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...