Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trying a new browser I've had this flash up a few times, everything's OK on a refresh though. Is it them or you?


"Error 400


We're sorry, but we could not fulfill your request for /forum/list.php?20 on this server.


The automated program you are using is not permitted to access this server. Please use a different program or a standard Web browser.


Your technical support key is: 5690-651e-7ad0-4a8a


You can use this key to fix this problem yourself.


If you are unable to fix the problem yourself, please contact db at eastdulwichforum.co.uk and be sure to provide the technical support key shown above."

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9915-error-using-chrome/
Share on other sites

This isn't chrome specific it's to do with your ip address.

It's the bad address blocker in action, and the very reason I can access forum from work; clearly

someone at the ministry of justice has, ironically, been a naughty boy.

Have you go chrome set up using a proxy address or something?

Nope. I used to get an error screenfrom work as it goes, but not one that said "The automated program you are using is not permitted to access this server", the one I got at work talked about proxy servers specifically.


Chrome is set up as default, no idea if that involves proxies.

Hmm, the error specifically states "The automated program you are using is not permitted to access this server. Please use a different program or a standard Web browser" without any mention of proxies. When I was unable to access the forum from work I had a different error which specifically mentioned proxy servers.


Any idea what it's referring to when it talks about an "automated programme"?



edit - double post as I got the error when attempting the first one!

ISP is BT.


I might be being daft but the one you referred to talks about proxy servers, and mine refers to an automated programme, different shurely?? Anyway I gogogled around the chrome help and it came up with some bits to will try that. To refer to an earlier post though this is Chrome specific for me, it doesn't happen on Avant, IE, or Firefox.


No worries anyway.

I don't mean to sound dim either but what is the difference between Chrome and Google? :-S I can't tell...and I use Chrome at home and Google at work!? Maybe its just not apparent to me so happy to be corrected if Chrome is much more FAB.


Ruffers - hope you managed to solve the problem/errors.


Cheers, K.

They're also branching into copyright theft. I like that. I work on creating something for five years and then they give it away for free. If you're not American. If you're American you get seven cents. Good pay for five years.


They were bloody immigrants anyway. But now they're American everyone else doesn't quite qualify for human rights. Apes can't claim intellectual property rights for the same reason. Do no evil? Google would rape you and claim they were doing it to share the experience.


Maybe that was the automated program? An autistic rapist burglar.


Feckers... as Sean would put it ;-)


Boycott Chrome.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...