Jump to content

Recommended Posts

oh poor you clux


did 2 yr old have "symptoms" before the actual spots came out and therefore for you to know it was on its way?


my 4 month old baby got it on sat 13th and to be honest i thought by now my 2 yr old hadn't got it so i would be in all clear but obviously not - agh - i know i've got to get it over and done with but i don't want my toddler to be wimpering :(


keep me informed and i pray it's over as soon as possible

Re getting it twice; My youngest had it when was a baby (under 18mths, but can't recall exact age due to crap-mumitis), He's been off colour since Monday evening, threw up all this morning & suddenly mid morning developed 3 distinctly chicken-poxy spots on his tummy. No further developments (other than miraculous recovery from tummy bug coinciding with the discovery of said spots).


Could he have caught it again? If so could he get away with only 3 spots. He says they're not itchy, but having been through it 4 times now, all quite badly, I like to think I can recognise a chicken pox if I see one & these definitely look poxy to me. I'm confused - Help!

hello


there were warning signs - the day before the spots appeared she was quite hot and she had a very pale rash across her stomach so i knew it was on its way!


we're on day 5 today and i think we may finally be over the worst. the poor little thing is totally covered (even got some in her mouth now) but she has only cried for about half the day as opposed to about 95% of the day like the rest of the week!!


you can get it twice if you only have a mild case the first time - or thats what a GP told my husband anyway

Yes, we had similar warning signs, but I just thought he had a bug - it never occurred to me it might be CP as he's already had it. Can you get it twice if you had a bad case first time round? he still only has 3 spots so it seems to be extremely mild if it is CP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...