Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My jacket was damaged at the gym as I was squeezing past someone not knowing that the wall was freshly painted (there were no signs!) Gym owner insists on a receipt - I bought that jacket approx. 1.5 years ago.


Is it reasonable to expect me to have a receipt after such a long time? She says she is not going to pay unless she has a receipt. I now found the jacket on the internet and I send her the link - original price ?150 / reduced to ?90 / I am asking for ?60. She says I have to proof purchase...


Does anybody have any idea on how to proceed?

I know that I paid - I didn't steal the jacket! (!) Can I seriously be expected to keep receipts that old? it's definitely more than a year ago. The statement doesn't state the item that I bought, only the shop name (if lucky) and the amount.
I think if you have the jacket (pretty conclusive proof of ownership) and an external verification of the price of it, it is not reasonable to insist on a receipt. If you sued her, you would not need a receipt to prove ownership as you have the jacket. Requests for receipts are more usual from insurers when the item has been stolen. But even they these days will not press the point if you have other evidence. Hope this helps.

the gym has been negligent and you have suffered a loss as a result. your loss is calculated as what? the cost of a replacement jacket of equal quality... dont settle for ?60 - go for ?150. If they dispute say that as you cant decide its best that the courts decide - thats if you are prepared to go to court - or at least threaten to, if not you wont get anything.

proof of purchase is irrelevant. you could have been given it as a gift but the loss is still the same - you now need to spend money putting yourself in the position you would have been had your jacket not been damaged - ie., a replacement jacket = ?150.

I think you've been very nice and I think her attitude sucks. Speaking personally, I'm quite litigious and it pays off 100%. I expect people to behave decently and, if they don't, I take no prisoners. Give her one last chance and then take her to the small claims court. This couldn't be more straightforward - you don't even need to leave the comfort of your laptop. You just fill out the form online, pay the fee (which she will need to repay when she looses), and hit send.


Effectively she has already admitted responsibility - she's just being awkward about receipts. You should claim for the full ?150. Also, remind her that when you go to court you will be claiming for your travel expenses and you will require compensating for using a day's holiday (if you are using a day's holiday).


Trust me - this is effective.


Over the last 15 years I have threatened the Small Claims Court 5 times.


3 times the defendant admitted the claim and paid up as soon as they received the SCC papers

2 times the defendant attempted to fight the claim - both lost, it cost them much more ??? than it would have had if they paid up in the first place, and finally, let me tell you - they both rued the day


I would also look to change your gym as quickly as possible and remind her that, not only are you taking her to court, she's losing your business.


People should just behave decently - that's my personal manifesto. If she can't step up then hit her where it hurts.

I would back-up Small Claims although I never use it as a threat I always intend to do it if they don't agree, I just give them the option beforehand.


I have settled with BP, HMRC and Dell Computers Inc. that way.


Add on the cost of the small claims application, the dry cleaning bill and any other costs you feel you actually incur.


The woman sounds unreasonable and may well believe she is correct and 'in the right', however the magistrate (or whatever he's called) will likely agree with you.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well GG - that is impressive - If I ever need a

> legal adviser but can't afford a lawyer I now know

> where to go.


Oh please don't MM. I know nothing about the law - except that it's an ass. The small claims court really is much more about who is right and who is wrong. It's brilliant.

Thank you for your responses. Yes, I think I will charge the full price of the jacket. I said ?60 before I found it on the internet...so that's her punishment (price goes up when you ask too many questions ;-)).


She is not only loosing me as a customer, but also my friend - we have already found a new gym.


Thanks again!

Hi Queen of Dulwich,


Just a precautionary note. Before heading for the small claims court, you should ideally have tried to sort the matter out beforehand. I know you say you have, but I would urge you to put this in writing purely for evidential purposes - just lay out the facts and your claim and give them a time limit in which to act (e.g. 14 days). This alone may well prompt them to settle. However, if they don't, write a second letter heading it "Letter Before Action". Not only should this set out your claim, but it should also state that you have had no response to your previous letter. If you do not do this, before taking the gym to court, the court may find that you have acted unreasonably and may penalise you by reducing (or even disallowing) the amount of your claim.


Good Luck.

I just wanted to reiterate how very very very easy the whole Small Claims Court application thing is. It honestly could not get any easier.


- You fill out an online form. You give details of both parties (you and the gym owner). You explain what has happened in simple language (i.e. you don't need a lawyer).


- You pay a fee (can't remember how much but it is not excessive - ?40 ish)


- The gym owner is sent a copy of the claim. She can then either (a) deny the claim - if she does this she'll need to have a good reason for doing so, and claiming that you don't have a receipt for your jacket will simply not fly or; (b) admit the claim and pay you the money for your jacket plus the court fees.


If she has any sense at all she will not let it get as far as the small claims court. Write her a stifly worded letter claiming the full cost of the coat and your dry cleaning expenses. Tell her that if you don't receive the funds within 7 days then you will proceed to the small claims court immediately. Remind her that if you take the matter further you will also be claiming all court expenses. Also tell her that you are very disappointed in her response to date and that she has lost a customer.

"If she has any sense at all she will not let it get as far as the small claims court. Write her a stifly worded letter claiming the full cost of the coat and your dry cleaning expenses. Tell her that if you don't receive the funds within 7 days then you will proceed to the small claims court immediately. Remind her that if you take the matter further you will also be claiming all court expenses. Also tell her that you are very disappointed in her response to date and that she has lost a customer."


Or, in other words...


 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...