Jump to content

Recommended Posts

sorry i apologise for that. i just assumed those who were attacking our petition were non-parents! it wasn't a generalisation on non-parents!


it would be understandable why some of the non-parents would not want public money being spent on early years education etc.. but not to the point of insulting those who do! so really we are not the bad guys here at all :)

I think you mistake criticism of your methods with criticism of your ends. I don't think anyone (happy to stand corrected on this) has suggested that they would wish to see the nursery closed (other things being equal) - merely that the way you have chosen to go about it (outwith anything you have done before posting notification of this petition) doesn't make a lot of sense. It was as if you had declared a wish to drive from London to Glasgow, but insisted that a route via Brighton, Cardiff, Nantes and Skye would be your optimal choice. Others have suggested otherwise, but that doesn't mean they don't think you shouldn't end up in Glasgow, they just feel the chosen route won't necessarily get you there.


To assume because we disagree with your methods that we are uncaring, childless trolls (pretty much your response on this) is perhaps an assumption too far. By inferring (I would guess wholly wrongly, certainly on my part) that we don't want money spent on early years education, for instance, is in no way relevant or consequent on our arguments that you have petitioned the wrong people, too late and/or have asked a Council to act outwith its legal powers.


Nor on an argument that by spending more on one nursery, given agreed budget heads, the Council would thus have to deprive another nursery. Once councils have agreed budgets these are no longer discretionary spends.

Penguin68 you know as well as i do that the future of school nurseries may or may not be secure given the cuts!

As for Fairlawn Nursery, it benefits schools considerably less better off than my son's school. Case in point, Adamsrill, Holy Trinity. So given these facts, you still argue that to hell with it which I find it to be really odd.



As for the petition it may or may not be to late as the nursery due to close in August!


So please don't use this on me.

Well I'm a parent, who also has a long association with Fairlawn. I was very sorry that the decision was made to close the nursery, but the governors carried out a proper consultation process and then took the final decision to close the nursery once the responses to the consultation had been received and considered by the governors. There is no right of appeal against the decision - it was for the governors of the school to make and no other body has any power to make the governors change or reconsider their decision.


The school offered places at Haseltine to parents on the waiting list, and there are other excellent nurseries in the area - I find it hard to believe that Eliot Bank can be too far away for anyone who wanted a place at Fairlawn. Many of the parents on the waiting list will have found other places by now anyway.


Whatever you may want to think, the final decision has been made and will not be changed.

Growlybear, if you are a parent at Fairlawn then you must understand why Fairlawn had to make that decision! i was present in the first consultation and had long chats with both heads about this issue since. But there are legalities as to what schools can or can't do. Fundraising was explored but frankly you can't run a nursery year in year out relying on fundraising.


no Eliot Bank is absolutely undoable for me so is Hazeltine. I won't send my child to St Francesca (a catholic school), no offence if you did. In any case, I had since sorted a place for my daughter anyhow.


Though stating that this petition is a useless exercise is dishonest! Even if doesn't achieve its ultimate goal, it has provided moral support for the staff at the nursery!

Of course I understand why the governors had to make the decision to close the nursery. I also understand the process for making such a decision, and am very much aware of the legalities of what schools can and can't do, as well as what the local authority can and can't do. It is not at all dishonest to say that the petition is useless because it will not serve it's original purpose, which was to 'save Fairlawn Nursery'. I also don't think the one or two staff who may or may not be affected by the closure really need moral support from an online petition!

This is not just a petition, it is a campaign. It has even made it to South London Press as well as backed by Forest Hill Society. A lot of the parents in Fairlawn School and Horniman School support this campaign!


I am therefore puzzled at your ignorance, Growlybear?

And I'm rather puzzled as to why you think I am ignorant? Surely refusing to accept that your petition is too late and aimed at the wrong body demonstrates quite a degree of ignorance?


Perhaps some of these parents at Fairlawn and Horniman Schools who supposedly support what has now become a 'campaign' rather than a petition should have voiced their views more strongly at the consultation meetings in January and put forward viable suggestions for keeping the nursery open. Or was it the case that the other parents understood and accepted the reasons for closing the nursery and the process that was followed?


yas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is not just a petition, it is a campaign. It

> has even made it to South London Press as well as

> backed by Forest Hill Society. A lot of the

> parents in Fairlawn School and Horniman School

> support this campaign!

>

> I am therefore puzzled at your ignorance,

> Growlybear?

Growlybear Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Perhaps some of these parents at Fairlawn and Horniman Schools who supposedly support what has

> now become a 'campaign' rather than a petition should have voiced their views more strongly at

> the consultation meetings in January and put forward viable suggestions for keeping the nursery

> open. Or was it the case that the other parents understood and accepted the reasons for closing

> the nursery and the process that was followed?


It sounds more like that if more of these people in favour of keeping the nursery open actually enrolled kids there, then it wouldn't be in this mess. After all, it is closing it due to lack of numbers.

Growlybear, as a fellow Fairlawn Parent, i feel it is my duty to inform that

3 members of staff are facing redundancies, 2 members of staff may have reduced hours, one will escape reduncancy by virtue of being pregnant.


As for the parents whose children were on the list to go to Fairlawn Nursery, 2 will go to a catholic school (one muslim, one eschewed catholisimn in favour of a different religion).


I was in a consultation meeting i did not hear a growlybear type of person voicing their concerns about this nursery going or expressing remorse (many parents at the very least expressed remorse). So you are not in a position to judge fellow parents.

Above all, this campaign is supported by fellow Fairlawn Parents as well as Horniman School and Forest Hill Society. Because if it is successful both our school and the wider community will benefit from it. So once again, your ignorance of what goes on in our school is puzzling to me.

We get that you're upset about this, but I don't think anyone has been insensitive to that fact - unless your definition of insensitive is "saying absolutely anything that contradicts my understanding of the world".


Suggesting that people who disagree with you must be childless and therefore not be entitled to an opinion could equally be construed as insensitive.

everybody is entitled to their opinion! but it is not nice being called a liar, arrogant etc... it could be done in a nicer way especially by fellow parents, i felt!


my situation is that i will be forced to pay for my child's nursery fee as 15 hours of child care doesn't translate into private nurseries very well. i may or may not be able to afford it as we are a one income family (my husband is a contractor, i should add). so i may even have to send my child to a catholic school nursery come September along with my other friends who are in the same situation as me.


so if you were in my situation, would you like to highlight your local nursery closing due to cuts is not great thing?

If I was in your position, I'd want to do something practical. So far on this thread, you appear to have claimed that the point of the petition/campaign is:


1. to stop the nursery from closing

2. to hightlight your perception that this is as a result of political decisions about cuts

3. to express solidarity with the nursery staff

4. to express that you are upset that this has affected you personally


People on this thread have tried to get you to clarify your objectives, to point out to you that you can't actually achieve 1. with the petition because that isn't legally possible and to get more clarity on what your evidence is for 2 (which you still haven't provided beyond rumour).


No-one actually called you a liar, but asked for evidence for your assertions. When you admitted you were mispresenting rumour as fact, you kinda branded yourself there.


It isn't nice to be called arrogant, but if you refuse to listen to anyone who doesn't just say "well done Yas", it's understandable that people have inferred that - particularly when you have been hostile first.


We understand that you are upset and angry, but how on earth are you helping things by lashing out at everyone like a petulant kid?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...