Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thatcher engineered a war in the South Atlantic to

> win an election. You think Blair's a scumbag?

>

> The problem Blair has to surmount is that he went

> to war to protect the self-indulgence of greedy

> Brits. He's like a guilty conscience.

>

> Unable to look ourselves in the mirror and

> recognise our rape of third world resources for

> the crime it is, we prefer to focus our disgust on

> a third party.

>

> The idea that Blair could act independently is

> really quite contemptuous. You should be thanking

> him for making the decisions you weren't big

> enough to make yourselves. ;-)



Hehe - you're on form at the mo. Love the snake oil thread too.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It get's better

>

> That's made me feel quite nauseous. I wish I

> could believe in reincarnation as at least we

> could cling to the comfort that further down the

> line there would be a reckoning. As it is, it

> looks like things keep getting better for those

> such as Tone and Thatcher. What a terrible state

> of affairs. Quite puts me off my lunch.



So that's why he didn't say anything about the bankers and other corporations having their snouts in the trough - cos he was snuffling out his own stash. It should be illegal - I hope some smart arse gets him on some kind of fraud/embezzlement or such - but no doubt the disgusting changeling will get away with all of this. I hope not though.

LE-ish wrote:- I hope some smart arse gets him on some kind of fraud/embezzlement or such - but no doubt the disgusting changeling will get away with all of this. I hope not though.



We take great care of our wrong doers,

we vote them back in having made the most fraudulent claims,

we take care of all the riff-raff who should be hung or worse,

and we re-employ them in highly paid jobs having made the severest blunders like that douglass hog character who was responsible for murdering thousands of pounds worth of beef cattle.

It's okay though he's still employed in that 'House of Conmens'.

Alastair Campbell for removing the words "may be" and replacing them with "are" in relation to those other 4 little words... Weapons of Mass Destruction..


and Blair for allowing him to do so....


http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/07/10/jt_blairandcampbell_wideweb__470x338,0.jpg


just look at those slippery little sh*tes

Charlie, I was going to come to the backgammon tonight but did not know it was a front for the local branch of "These Tories". Scumbag of the year is David Cameron, who will go down in history as the man who lost a 20 point lead in the polls to one of the most, if not the most, psychologically-flawed PMs in history.

TonyQuinn Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charlie, I was going to come to the backgammon

> tonight but did not know it was a front for the

> local branch of "These Tories". Scumbag of the

> year is David Cameron, who will go down in history

> as the man who lost a 20 point lead in the polls

> to one of the most, if not the most,

> psychologically-flawed PMs in history.


_________________________________________________


Still...


"Dave" must have the "should have gone to specsavers" ad in the bag


Surely, no ?



W**F

The journalist/headline writer who wrote this deliberately misleading headline:


White Cliffs of Dover to be sold to the French to help reduce Government's debt


Actual story is about the port of Dover being sold


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249194/Dover-symbol-British-sovereignty-sold-French-help-reduce-debt.html

Acid Casual Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ali Dizaei.


> Now proven to be a crooked hood. With so much

> previous smoke, everyone knew there was bound to

> be fire somewhere along the line.


_______________________________________________________


Oh...


So he was a "hoodie" Fireman & a Policeman too ?


Blimey, no wonder he was a bit stressed out



It's hard to hold down two jobs you know




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...