Jump to content

Scumbag of the year award goes to

????

By ????
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

woofmarkthedog

woofmarkthedog

Posted
Posted

Time



It trivialises the world


I went to school with the Sha of Iran's sons


Oh yeah, & they turned up with big black limo's & helicopters, body guards , the whole 9 yards


Sure, not everyones experience, but a fuck load of Catholic church scholarship money my education spent however,


I later met the "Irianian/Persian" minister of culture running a take away in Brighton called "Roller Coaster"


Which leveled things out somewhat


He made a mean "sweet meat" in pitta




W**F

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Thatcher engineered a war in the South Atlantic to win an election. You think Blair's a scumbag?


The problem Blair has to surmount is that he went to war to protect the self-indulgence of greedy Brits. He's like a guilty conscience.


Unable to look ourselves in the mirror and recognise our rape of third world resources for the crime it is, we prefer to focus our disgust on a third party.


The idea that Blair could act independently is really quite contemptuous. You should be thanking him for making the decisions you weren't big enough to make yourselves. ;-)

SteveT

SteveT

Posted
Posted

Ex-Speaker of the 'house of common thieves' mr martin who complained that the public should never had the information released regarding MP's expenses.


When the finger pointed at him he tried to blame it all on the lady who had been in post for only two weeks, that is a scumbag!

Roll Deep

Roll Deep

Posted
Posted

"Thatcher engineered a war in the South Atlantic to win an election."


No. A foreign power took territory they claimed belonged to them by force to distract a restless and desperate public from the their failings at home. Thatcher decided to re-take the Falklands by force, not engineer a war. Although it no doubt recieved praise from voters.


My Dad also helped boot the Argies out.

Roll Deep

Roll Deep

Posted
Posted

"Any oil in the vicinity of them there Malvinas?"


Yes, although there were ample reserves off our coastline at the time and the technology for deep-water drilling - which would be essential for exploiting any reserves in that enviroment - was still in it's infancy.


The liberty of British subjects was the reason for re-taking the islands. Not exploration rights.

HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To me - for not tipping the guys who delivered my

> furniture last weekend struggling up narrow stairs

> and having to take doors off etc etc (don't know

> why I didn't have the money ready) :(


Jesus, Katie, you're right. This thread should stop here.

For that sort of job, Blair, Thatcher, Mugabe, heck even Hitler would have given the lads concerned a nice drink.

My advice Katie, is from now on just have very small items delivered.

I happen to know there is a masonic-style brotherhood of delivery drivers and no doubt you've been whitevanlisted.

From now on let your motto be 'Nothing I can't carry on the bus'.


Sorry for your trouble.

katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

HonaloochieB - i meant to say that I agreed with the original post which got me to read the thread in the first place...as I voted for them back then too :'(


...didn't intend to divert attention from the real scumbags of the year.


*goes off to think about small things*

HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB - i meant to say that I agreed with

> the original post which got me to read the thread

> in the first place...as I voted for them back then

> too :'(

>

> ...didn't intend to divert attention from the real

> scumbags of the year.

>



> *goes off to think about small things*


The small things, OR INDEED THE SMALL PEOPLESSS. Eh Katie?

Perhaps the butterfly flutter of a lack of a porboire from you could have a financially hurricaneick effect on a painter and decorator in Japan.

Davio might have to knock off an hour early because his boss Terrio can't afford to keep two men up a ladder all day.

But that probably wouldn't be your fault. Almost definitely not.

Anyway don't feel bad.

Easties EL

Easties EL

Posted
Posted

Feel gutted for Wayne Bridge. I think the back lash from this story will in the long run harm John Terry, he's going to lose a lot of respect from his team mates for cheating with his team mates ex.


Truth be told, these stories aren't real news stories. I bet Tony Blair, is glad this has pushed his enquiry story back.

giggirl

giggirl

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It get's better


That's made me feel quite nauseous. I wish I could believe in reincarnation as at least we could cling to the comfort that further down the line there would be a reckoning. As it is, it looks like things keep getting better for those such as Tone and Thatcher. What a terrible state of affairs. Quite puts me off my lunch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Holland & Barrett is coming to Lordship Lane

      By jazzer · Posted

      Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • jazzer
      mattress suggestions please

      By jazzer · Posted

      IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • Cancerian
      Holland & Barrett is coming to Lordship Lane

      By Cancerian · Posted

      I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Sue
      mattress suggestions please

      By Sue · Posted

      Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...