Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh, I hope so.


I'm delighted (for Apple) that they've managed to persuade hundreds of millions of people that iPhones and iPods are 'the thing to have' but for me, computers have only ever been purchased on the basis on what I need them for, how well they work and value for money.

I hate to say it, but the iPad is not going to replace a PC to most extents.


Sure if you want it purely to browse the web, or send emails, then go for it I say.


If you want to use it for video and music, you have to synch it through a PC/MAC anyway.


If you want it for creating documents, the best you'll get are 3rd party text editors.


As has been said, its an intermediary device for playing around on the web or viewing movies on the commute, thats about it.

stevebailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to say it, but the iPad is not going to

> replace a PC to most extents.


Surely.. but then it isn't meant to; no more than an iPod can replace the necessity for iTunes and a computer to sync to.


For me, the killer iPad 'deciders' will centre on whether its limited multitasking abilities will be a problem, and the nagging suspicion that iPad Mk II will feature a more regular Mac OS rather than one based on the iPhone.

*Bob*


Who cares what "they" all say & don't forget they are all poor


Unlike us, who live in bed sits with a vast hoard of cash waiting to be spent


Picture this scene....


You're naked & "working" from home, you have a seizure whilst reading a porn mag on top of the wardrobe


Your wife walks in & as you spin through the air you manage to clip the I-Pad which is laying on the bed with your foot


You hit the floor, the I-Pad lands on top of the porn mag and hides it perfectly


The wife walks out again & shuts the door


Imagine the horror of the scene if the new Macintosh device wasn't there, for that alone



I'm buying one for sure



W**F

Scientist man say big new shiny thing good for *Bob* who want watch telly and email at same time. On trains. *Bob* buy big shiny thing. MrBen need things shiny thing cannot do. He not watch telly on trains. So he no buy. He think giant i-phone is "Emperors new clothes". But *Bob* look more cool than MrBen. This not hard. Meanwhile Scientist man make lots money and hatch plans for other new shiny things to make it all better.

Actually I do take an occasional train.. and did indeed get on the morning train to London Bridge a couple of days ago.


It was full of freaks emailing on their iPhones and Blackberries, because there were clearly important emails which needed urgent attention in-between the emails they sent at home on their laptops before they set-off and the emails they'd be sending as soon as they arrived at work.

And there it is, for I am that freak. It occasionally saves me 30 mins on the day I'd otherwise spend listening to commuter snoring, talking about their house purchase falling through or watching someone read the Metro. Well that was my excuse when I bumped into Moos the other day complaining of thumb cramp....


And a contract Blackberry is a twenty quid emailing machine no? I guess I just don't have the same usage profile as that which Apple are aiming this at. On planes I'll read or watch a film on the in built E/S. Trains - as above unless its to Edinburgh where East Coast let me plug my Macbook in. So *Bob* just curious as to where / when you'd use it?

I have explained all this, Ben. BEN.. pay attention.


I already have a Mac Pro, powered by eight huge hairy testicles which does everything I need: vomits-out my irritating musical creations plus any other work-related blah, puts the kettle on, sucks me off - the lot.


I have nine year-old iBook which is dead. No iPhones or other such nonsense.


Other factors include: girlfriend (also home-based), house, stairs, garden.


Essentially we require something else to browse the web and send emails on. Whilst sitting in the garden. Whilst sitting in the kitchen. Whilst watching telly. Whilst curling one down. When the Hairy Mac is in use. Everywhere except in the same place as the one I have to spend several hours per day looking at.


Consider the iPad in relation to the alternatives.


Netbook - slightly cheaper, doesn't work very well.

Mac Laptop - twice the price, don't need the features

iPhone-type thing - pocket-sapping contract, fiddly to use, can't share it with TheMissus

PC laptop - same price, doesn't work as well, don't need the features


What would you do?

If you added up the money you would have earned per/hour working instead of trying to convince yourself to get one of these things by seeking vindication from people whose only qualification for opinion is that we have at some stage googled ?East Dulwich? does it equal the price of one?


An ipad that is.


It sounds like a high tech sanitary towel.

Aha. My apologies. I get it now. As a cost efficient add on to whatever laptop you already have for web browsing in the garden, kitchen etc. And I guess I don't do that. When I'm in the garden I like to do anything but look at the screen thats fried my brain for 5 days. And Apple screens reflect horribly in day light. The kitchen though , yes, as getting sick of the gfs greasy paws on my macbook as she makes another dish off the BBC Good Food website.


Give me time...I'll come round to it in the end.

The Apple iPad Case with Protective Wings


http://ny-image1.etsy.com/il_430xN.125922357.jpg


This is real and you can buy it here: http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=41296440



Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It sounds like a high tech sanitary towel.

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...