Jump to content

A Tesco store has asked customers not to shop in their pyjamas or barefoot


Recommended Posts

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you thick lm? never, the mangoes were over priced

> too.



Should have gone to Spec Savers.



Bye the way...apart from the flip flops and yoga mat, are we to understand that you went into Tescos totally starkers?

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wot would they do if you were naked and were

> purchasing the "banned" articles to save your

> temporary embarrassment? oooo there's a thought



One for European Courts of Justice I think.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It may have been embarrassing for those around

> *rolls eyes*



It depends KK...do you know something the rest of us don't? (hee hee)

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck, the sausage that i wacked you in the

> face with was from an intensively reared pig. I do

> apologize, it should have been organic and local.

> :)



I feel tainted.

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Anyway PJs look

> like clothes these days and vice versa.



That's so true...many a time people have taken the micky out of - e.g. - my shirts stating that they look like jim-jams...so...could there be grounds for appeal in a test case perhaps?...are Tescos infringing our human rights?...I might just go and test it out if I feel sufficiently devilish!;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...