Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In this election year, some interesting changes to the Dulwich & Welst Norwood constituency boundary.


http://election.pressassociation.com/Constituencies/general.php


Major change in losing the South Camberwell area, and in general the constituency seems to have moved west (losing to east, gaining to west).

More info on Boundary Commission for England website:


http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/


The change index is quite high, and it looks like TJ's majority would have been much reduced in 2005 with the new boundaries.

You actually want reduced majority's if possible because if you win by say a 10,000 majority you are effectively wasting 9,000 votes that could be used to help win another seat nearby. This is why the marginal constituency is so important in this election.


The boundaries are set-up at the moment to favour Labour so i wouldn't worry too much ratty.

How bad are Labour after 13 years of hacking away at our rights and freedoms? Bad enough to make this voter cast his first ever Tory vote come May this year.


Cameron should go with the slogan "Conservatives - Really, Can We Be Any Worse Than This Lot?"


(That's not counting my secondary vote for Boris at the last Mayor election. The decision between him and Ken took me quite a while. Not sure Boris counts as an actual Tory vote - it was more like a vote for the Buffoon Party. But I decided Ken had been in too long and had run out of ideas. Pity, I voted for him both the previous times.)


The worrying things is that Brown will lose the election, get the heave-ho and in will slide Mad Hattie. That's Labour out for the next two elections.

Well you'll be voting for a different set of candidates and will end up with a different MP, for starters, and the impact of your vote may be quite different (different majority?).


The main point of the rejigging was to equalise the number of voters in each constituency, as the figures were previously very unbalanced (Peckham was the smallest constituency in the country). So each vote will now count for roughly the same across Lambeth and Southwark. But the political impact is something else.

the boundary commission do the rejigging and greatly resent any suggestion of party bias. I am sure that's true, but the changes do usually damage labour. our street has been shifted from tessa's constituency to hattie's. I don't mind that as I like her (but wouldn't let her park our car), but we are a bit bothered about having peckham in the new name as we are zealously east dulwich!!

but the changes do usually damage labour This is only true where (particularly in the inner cities) there are disproportionately small constituencies compared with suburban areas - labour has been graced with a large number of small contituencies - I can't remember the exact number, but it needed far fewer labour voters (i.e. the electorate in these seats is smaller and fewer votes are thus needed to achieve a majority) to elect an MP than conservative (or lib dem). Hence the dominant labour majorities (recently) compared with the share of the national popular vote.


Damage is thus very much a matter of perspective - the changing of electoral boundaries is intended to unwind damage to democracy so that each consituency has a similar sized electorate.

thank you for your kind lesson in electoral boundaries. changes DO usually damage labour's prospects, so it is not a matter of perspective or even perception. it is a fact. you, I suspect, are a lib dem, so any change enhances your prospects.. altho not, I fear, in either of the constituencies under discussion.

While the boundary changes are considered to have an impact in ?giving? the Conservatives more seats than they would otherwise win under the old boundaries ? it doesn?t go anywhere near far enough (and probably couldn?t) in addressing the current built in bias toward Labour.


This is not the result of some sinister plot or deal but down to the geographical distribution of seats, numbers of actual voters and reflects history, geography and a tendency for people to move out of inner city areas if they become more successful / well to do.


In 2005, Labour took 56% of the seats with 36% of votes cast, the Conservatives took 32% of seats with 33% of votes cast and the Liberal Democrats took 10% of seats with 23% of votes cast.


So broadly the ?old constituencies? appear fair to Conservatives, biased toward Labour and unfair to Lib Dems.


When Conservatives or Lib Dems win seats they tend to have large majorities ? which could be considered as wasted votes. Where Labour win they tend to have smaller majorities spread over a larger number of constituencies ? more efficient distribution of voters gives them the majority of seats.


In 2005 Labour won a seat for roughly every 28,000 votes cast in its favour, the ratio for the Conservatives was 42,000 and 110,000 for Lib Dems. It will be interesting to see what the ratios are after May 6.


For the Conservatives to win big at the 2010 General Election will require a very improved turnout of Tories in the tighter constituencies currently held by Labour (possible) and a collapse of the Labour vote (probable) but unless the overall swing in key marginals is over 10% a hung parliament is a real possibility; a 5% swing to Conservatives would only bring about a balanced outcome with roughly 45% Labour seats, 45% Conservative seats and 10% Lib Dems.

Puzzled wrote:-


changes DO usually damage labour's prospects, so it is not a matter of perspective or even perception. it is a fact. you, I suspect, are a lib dem, so any change enhances your prospects... in response I believe to my posting.


In which case I would like to mention (a) that I am not a lib dem and (b) that 'damaging labour's prospcts' and 'enhancing the democratic rights of individuals to have the same weight of vote in whichever constituency they live' are an issue of perspective. I might assume that those preturnaturally worried about 'damaging labour's prospects' are of that leaning, and that revelling in an unfair distribution of seats across the electorate sits well from a party led by someone who eschews elections like the plague, and who places some of the most powerful of his government inside the un-elected and unaccountable House of Lords. But I won't. (And no, I'm not conservative either)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s 3 AM - Anyone know when this horrendous noise is going to stop?! We’re on the Sainsbury’s Local end of Landells and am quite frankly sympathising with all of you nearer Peckham Rye. My ears are ringing! How is this ok?!  Edit: According to the website it should have finished by 22:30. What is going on and how is this acceptable (and not more people are complaining about the crippling sound levels we’re being subjected to?) - shocking.. 
    • https://chng.it/YXCH5XXVMY We live near and it’s absolute hell. The noise of the people coming and going from Peckham is the worse. They are so loud and obnoxious. This is my 5th year of this nonsense. People vomiting in my front garden, urinating in my neighbour’s gardens, throwing food into my garden. Screaming waking up my children while waiting for their Ubers. The people that organise this festival are 100% obnoxious. They told us there would be security along our road (there wasn’t). I asked them to put up my family in a hotel but they wouldn’t. It’s actually a human rights infraction for all of us this badly affected. Over the years I have spent so much money trying to be away this weekend but none of us should have to. The data also shows that most people coming are not local residents - so of 3000 tickets sold, hardly any to residents; it’s easy to argue that it disadvantages us residents way more than any conceivable benefit. My elderly neighbours are besides themselves. Every year the setup and striking of the festival blocks off the park during half term, plus the antisocial behaviour and loud noises mean actual children that live here are prevented from using the park and playgrounds. The police initially rejected the license last year… then suddenly changed their mind with no apparent reason… seems legit. Also the GALA team lie and make false statements in their advertising about consulting with us (they don’t they just tell us what is going to happen then are extremely obstinate and rude). My neighbour runs Friends of Peckham Rye and has been totally distressed by all the damage done to recent planting initiatives funded by the local community. GALA do not repair this, GALA pay off Southwark and then Southwark refuse to confirm what they are paid, or how much (if anything) is spent to repair the park.   This needs to be stopped once and for all!!   Petition asking Southwark to stop providing the license to GALA once and for all.    I mean I am sure they will listen to us just like they did about the LTNs…   https://chng.it/YXCH5XXVMY
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...