Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In my opinion the reason behind Big Brother failing to really grip its viewers, was the core notion that everyone involved in the whole sham was fundamentaly aware of. Safety.


The contestants, viewers and those responsible for the show all knew that the 'guinea pigs' would come to no serious harm. This core repetition of policy was what really ruined it for most. We never saw them at their most desperate.


I'm not for one second suggesting that any sort of harmful menace be introduced to the house, be it a virus or dangerous animal. Just that the people who designed the house and the staff behind the mirrors excercised a bit of imagination when it came to manipulating the stresses and moral of these strangers who were living in such close proximity to each other.


For example...


Some of the main doors such as the ones that allow access to the bedrooms should've been able to lock. Not to facilitate any privacy for any amorous housemates, but to initiate what alot of viewers really wanted. Anxiety followed by mental and emotional torment. When all the housemates were safely tucked up in bed the Big Brother staff could lock the doors and subtly wake them. They would notice that in the communal area the lights were on and would proceed to investigate 'knowing' the doors would open. Upon finding the doors don't open they would become perplexed and wonder why they don't open. Then their attention should be drawn to the figures in the inaccessible comunnal area wearing Hazmat suits looking under cushions and carrying out tests on the drinking water. All knowledge of this nocturnal activity would be flatly denied by the Big Brother team.


Other methods of mental breakdown would be to cut off communication with their Big Brother custodians. Again, after a week normality would return and any hiccup would be flatly denied.


Turn off the drinking water for a week. Imply that a housemate may have been hoarding the valuable resource.




So there you have it. Nothing that would invite litigation upon the release of the tortured souls, but enough to ensure the audience nibbles through their Hobnobs faster than usual.


That's all.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9682-the-failing-of-big-brother/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...