Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...

Keef Wrote: (July 2nd 2007)

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not surprised he put up a fight, the sick git would have known that he was f**ked as soon as he saw the police, and was probably thinking about all the beatings he will hopefully receive in jail when it gets out that he's a dirty nonce!



I really must have been having a bit of a Daily Mail day when I wrote that, and definitely didn't know the guy's age.


I really hope that when he is sentenced, he receives some help, rather than just being banged up for years, and at the mercy of prison justice.


I heard a thing on Radio 4 a while back where a self confessed paedophile told how he was happily married and had a daughter, then one day they were baby sitting for someone, and when he saw the other child naked, he found himself feeling titilated. Just imagine how horrified and scared you'd feel if you experienced those urges!


The guy in question was confronted by his wife after their daughter had told her that her dad had touched her. He came clean, and sought help, and they were trying to rebuild their relationship, but he said he didn't feel safe being with his daughter alone.


After hearing this, I really did think about what that must be like. I mean sure, there are some nasty sick people out there, and some are just plain evil, but I guess we can't exactly help certain urges, and where the hell would you go to seek help if you started having urges like that? It's not the sort of thing you sit down and discuss with your GP!


Anyway, sorry, not really ED related, but thought I'd just add it.

  • 1 month later...

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow, he felt unsettled because he's partner was

> pregnant so decided to snatch a kid!

> Unbelievable defence. Really @#$%& unbelievable


well quite. Who's the 'lucky' girl I wonder :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...