Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's very useful thank you!


Just one question on builder's insurance - does anyone know if their insurance will cover a builder if he doesn't comply with good practice/ regulations etc? My concern is that a cowboy cuts corners which leads to structural problems but his insurer won't pay out to remedy the problem because he wasn't compliant in his actions

I was talking about public liability insurance for accidental damage which a good builder should have to cover things that might happen (and do happen even with a good builder). If you are concerned about shoddy work, just casually ask your neighbours about building control inspections to make sure proper oversight for the LA is in place. That should be more than adequate and is in your neighbours best interest as well.


Good luck!

What you have to take into account is that a party wall agreement (amongst other things) documents the state of your house before the work starts - that is a good starting place to negotiate from if the builder does cause any accidentla damage - which might include e.g. cracking in your walls caused by work on the other side.


If you really get on with your neighbours you could take photographs 'before' and get them to agree these - but a party wall agreement does give you a legal framework - their builder would have to put right any consequential defects but it's much easier to get this done if such an agreement is in place (and you may find their insurance will require such an agreement in place before they agree to pay out!).


Whatever your relations with your neighbour, these agreements exist for a purpose.

When we had some work done a few years back, the neighbours just took photos of the wall and sent it to us (and the builders) before the work started. I think it's a fairly common arrangement, and IMO it's quite sensible if the builder has a reasonable reputation/presence locally. And you might be glad of the good will if you decide to do your own extension or loft conversion at some point.

The builder is liable with or without a party wall agreement. The party wall doesn't create any new rights for either party whatsoever.


This may be true, but the builder may be more difficult to persuade (outwith legal recourse) if his insurance is unhappy to pay out. And there may also be issues about consequential loss. Of course it is possible to proceed without such an agreement, and 9 times out of 10 (possibly 99 out of a 100) this will all be fine. But it is the tenth (or hundredth) time that it may be an issue. Your risk.

The builder isn't party to the party wall agreement. Its between the neighbours. A builder doesn't even need to be appointed.


I'm not saying don't get a party wall agreement but don't get one because you think you get extra rights. The official guidance makes it very clear that the main benefit is an agreed basis of the condition of the house before work starts by an objective 3rd party that's well documented.


If you both feel comfortable you can take pictures and agree the condition between yourselves, you'll still achieve the main benefits of a partywall for this type of work. If you feel out of your depth documenting something like this though, go ahead and appoint a shared surveyor who can do a thorough job.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When we had some work done a few years back, the

> neighbours just took photos of the wall and sent

> it to us (and the builders) before the work

> started. I think it's a fairly common arrangement,

> and IMO it's quite sensible if the builder has a

> reasonable reputation/presence locally. And you

> might be glad of the good will if you decide to do

> your own extension or loft conversion at some

> point.


Did the photos form part of an official Agreement, or did you just have photos?...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did the photos form part of an official Agreement,

> or did you just have photos?...


Just photos... and a written acknowledgement from the builders, stating they'd rectify any damage. Everyone seemed OK with that.

Yep, there's no official form as such. Some people won't be aware that party wall works aren't just confined to works on a party wall, it also includes excavations to nearby works. This is a good guide to that and everything else...

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/393927/Party_Wall_etc__Act_1996_-_Explanatory_Booklet.pdf

Hey soyamocha3

Have they started which way did it go?


Two surveyors and then they selected a Third surveyor as per Daft Legislation?


Or did you get a free holiday out of it whilst keeping every one of your rights (the rights you were never going to lose) as a adjoining neighbour?


#CrazyLawsMakingExpertsRichForNothing

Is it just me or do others get annoyed when ..


You go out of your way to give advice when it's requested and the individual who you've provided said advice disappears without returning to the thread to thank or let those who helped know how they got on?


Maybe just me? Such bad manners IMHO :) !


Oh well Users all over the place, sad silly people I guess and you don't know until you've gone to the trouble of passing on your hard earned advice and researched some information for those who are out of their depth and in "big" trouble.


ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

soyamocha3 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In case you did not get that the first time - you

> really are a @#$%& arsehole


soyamocha3 in case you did not get that the first time Satanic Forum Rules


?Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.

?Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.

?When in another's lair, show him respect or else do not go there.

?If a guest in your lair annoys you, treat him cruelly and without mercy.

No, you were the one who inferred she was a "sad small brained selfish ignorant" person, badgered her with a sarcastic post about whether she got a free holiday and was generally unnecessarily aggressive in tone.


I don't particularly agree with her position either, but I think I might have been provoked to the retort she made to you in private from the way you are going on at her.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Cheers @Dogkennelhillbilly   Fascinating edition of More of Less on Radio 4 on the oft quoted figure of 3/4 million empty homes in the UK.  That is a snap shot on one day on properties excluded from council tax including the owner dying, being renovated, moved house and the like. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002phn6 Right, off to talk more stats on the transport threads. PS Victoria got some stats very wrong on Newsnight on Venezuelan oil exports which the US/Venezuelan hawk/spokesperson did not contradict.   
    • got a collection gathering dust? especially in the era of streaming services.. need the space?  most things considered rock / indie / hip hop / dance / funk / soul / heavy metal / jazz etc etc no easy listening  DM if you think you have something of interest.. cash awaits thanks Tim 
    • So much nonsense in a single post! 1) this vaguely xenophobic stuff is based on a belief that London is full of houses owned by foreigners that are kept empty and out of the hands of native buyers and renters. This is unmitigated bullshit. "England has the lowest rate of empty homes in the OECD, and Greater London has about one-tenth the level of Paris, just 0.7% of properties being empty compared to 6.5%...the effect on the general housing crisis is minuscule. London, Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton and other cities have eye-wateringly expensive housing because of high demand and low supply. That’s the obvious and boring answer." https://www.edwest.co.uk/p/the-myth-of-londons-empty-homes 2) where do you get this idea that infill sites have to be small? Southwark and the GLA planning documents explicitly recognise that industrial sites can be infill sites. 3) It is simply factually untrue and misleading that taller buildings are out of character for the area of the development. The neighbouring school has taller blocks, Hambledon Court on the other side of the tracks is a taller building, the Dog Kennel Hill estate on the other side of the station consists of taller buildings. 4) if that is the lesson you have taken away, then is your opposition to this new housing in East Dulwich part of a Lib Dem policy to "deny, baby, deny"? Let's be real for a second: there is no way out of the housing crisis that doesn't involve building lots of new housing. If we can't build on top of a disused builder's yard above a railway station, where are we going to build in this neighbourhood? 5) This is also nonsense. The student accommodation was initially closed because of systemic fire risks that made the buildings unsafe. KCL is now halfway through totally renovating the blocks and expanding capacity. KCL gets twice as many applications for student accommodation as it can fulfil. KCL just opened another 452 student rooms in Battersea - so clearly they don't have a concern about a cataclysmic decline in student numbers. https://www.rlb.com/europe/projects/kcl-champion-hill/ https://roarnews.co.uk/2024/kcl-accommodation-still-empty-four-years-after-evacuation/ https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2025/03/03/watkin-jones-wins-30m-student-digs-campus-upgrade/   It is really disappointing that someone involving themselves in planning matters is relying on (and spreading) prejudices, misconceptions and misinformation like this.
    • Hello, I am pleased to let you know that registration for the Spring term is now open. Classes will begin from the week commencing 12th January 2026.  Spring Term Classes We offer a wide range of online and in-person classes to build confidence, creativity and future-ready skills. Click on the links below for more details: Onsite Coding and STEM classes at libraries in Southwark Online Coding Classes Online Maths Classes Online Creative and non-fiction writing classes Duke of Edinburgh’s Award 👉Click  here to register: https://www.ignitehubs.org.uk/register New Online Coding Classes Micro:bit – Physical Computing An introduction to physical computing and coding using the BBC Micro:bit through interactive projects. Please note: after the half-term break, students will need to have access to a Micro:bit. They cost around £18, and we will provide details on where to buy one if needed. Ignite Hubs will provide free kits to families in need of financial support. To find out more about Micro:bit, please click here. 🕛 Mondays | 5pm to 6pm Age 7 to 18 Click here for more details Computational Thinking Learn the core principles of computer science. Explore how computers work and develop computational thinking skills. 🕛 Wednesdays | 6pm to 7pm Age 7 to 18 Click here for more details Duke of Edinburgh’s Award (DofE) Ignite Hubs is an Approved Activity Provider for the skills section of the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award (DofE). Students can select any of our classes as their chosen skill. Click here for more details: https://www.ignitehubs.org.uk/duke-of-edinburgh Places are limited, so please book as soon as possible.  We look forward to welcoming your child to learn with us for an exciting Spring term. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Many thanks,   Lin Ignite Hubs Coding Classes Spring 26.pdf STEM Hub Spring 26.pdf
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...