Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> little bit jealous of course.


Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was joking.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Declan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Really, shouldn't you be calling for a

> > clampdown on local snoopers. Unless you're a

> > little bit jealous of course.

>

> Erm...I presume your tongue is firmly in your

> cheek? It sounded to me as though HAL9000 was

> joking.


Yes......I know Hal was joking too.


*sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes......I know Hal was joking too.

>

> *sighs and wonders if he is too obscure*



Well that's just fine and dandy...apologies for suggesting otherwise...and no, you're not obscure - though perhaps (as suggested by brum) a winky smiley thingamijig might have assisted on this occasion.


*breathes a sigh of relief and raises a glass of uisce beatha in Declan's direction*

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.



I think you have a great memory for someone your age computedshorty. Hope the streets of ED weren't like this in the 'old days'....xx

I had a shag in the back of my car many years ago and was caught by the milkman .....



.... the next day, only because I failed to dispose of the used condom correctly and it was stuck hanging ut of the rear door (sealed end showing) for all to see....


He didn't let me live that down for years (I have since moved away from where I was living then in shame)

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The picture of the 1960 M.O.T. shows the

> passengers are in the back demonstrating the extra

> stress to the susspesion under special

> circumstances that might arise.

> It was thought at the time this would not happen,

> so was not added to the items to be examined.


________________________________________________________________



You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S


Ok what car make & model is that , Hm ?


Oh & that's photo is earlier than the vague old 60s BTW so it pre dates the actual MOT


Lastly it is on a rolling road but the men from the Ministry of Transport didn't wear a white lab coat


It was a Tan colour they wore .


Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him a nudge



W**F

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are full of sh!te aren't you C.S...

> Slipped the "old mans" mind did it, well give him

> a nudge



*affixes muzzle*


Now leave him/her alone...bad dog...tis just good clean fun...s/he aint doin no arm to no-one...you ear me? Now SIT!

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think we may have to have Woofie's nuts off. He

> is getting far too aggressive.


Oh Woofie just gets carried away...an excitable puppy that's all...but I have the phenobarbitol ready should the situation require it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...