Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> brum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > ...blimey, and I thought I had just imagined

> > it...! ;-)

>

>

> Nope...I was there...it happened...



You'll be saying she sat on my lap next. You lot have such vivid imaginations.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> brum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

>

> > You'll be saying she sat on my lap next. You

> lot

> > have such vivid imaginations.

>

>

> No, that was somebody else...a different

> occasion...if I recall correctly!!!


No LM, I don't think you do recall correctly!

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you naughty brum, you enjoyed LadyM's slaps

> too.:))



Yes! And well deserved were those slaps!!! But brum, you are beginning to sound like a right little sex-pot as well as a masochist!



*curled up laughing*

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> > No, that was somebody else...a different

> > occasion...if I recall correctly!!!

>

> No LM, I don't think you do recall correctly!


Sorry brum...there were other...shall we call them "witnesses"...your senile dementia is getting worse



*now rolling about on floor*

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you naughty brum, you enjoyed LadyM's slaps

> > too.:))

>

>

> Yes I did. Can't deny that! Ok, err, moving

> on......(please)



Oh my Lawd...you weren't supposed to enjoy them!!!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KalamityKel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > well if you will start a thread on such a

> > subject...

>

> Quite...let's just say...you had it coming...


well, this is the naughty room isn't it...

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well if you will start a thread on such a

> subject...



A bit harsh Kel. I mean, it wasn't as if it was me doing anything naughty... I was an innocent passer-by....! I feel my reputation has been sullied by the other suggestions... by the way, did you really drop your earring under the table??? ;-)

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> A bit harsh Kel. I mean, it wasn't as if it was me

> doing anything naughty... I was an innocent

> passer-by....!


We know brum...KK was only teasing...



I feel my reputation has been

> sullied by the other suggestions...


I was just teasing too...sorry if I offended


but you did enjoy the slaps though...


*grins very mischievously*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been thinking about it and what I have loosely come up with so far are sites and types. Sites Here, Comment is Free, the Independent, the BBC (difficult as their comments section is only ever on trivia), The Telegraph (less so but increasing), The times (rapidly increasing), New Statesman, Spectator (much less so but some increase) even the Daily Mail and UnHerd (perhaps even union platforms, agit-prop and "progressive" platforms, XR, "middle-East", Just Stop Oil, Reddit, Bluesky, Truth Social etc.) I am sure the AI will find more to cross-reference. Types Astro-turfers, single-issue obsessives (frequently overlap with Astro-turfers), floral enforcers, ideologues, political staff, hypocrites, luxury belief pushers, Igors and Renfields. The vast majority are; normal local residents a bit frustrated with something; those looking for a tradesman; or just the friendly saying hello and looking for a bit of community. Spartacus thank you. Although you should probably find something else  more interesting to occupy your time; my energy for this is rapidly deflating. It won't disappear and I will get it done (once I work out which AI and which parameters to use) but it might not happen for a while. I saw your comment on the PIP thread; you have to use your single worst day to apply. Being bravely determined not to be defeated (a quality most normal people find admirable and honourable) means your claim can easily be rejected or at least made difficult. "I will get up, I will walk to the shop, I will cook". Those are the tests you have to make clear you only ever fail at. Sorry but its the truth. I wish you good luck with it.
    • Going by tracking information they go via Croydon and East Dulwich (Peckham) sorting offices. Round my way, and I know it varies from street to street, delivery of tracked items brought by the regular postman is mostly reliable. I've noticed if there isn't a postman doing a regular round, there may be a walking postman just delivering the tracked items. 
    • Are the parcel services organised by the local sorting office? We always notice parcels delivered by the vans are delivered on time but those that come via the postie can be unpredictable and we often get a "you were not in" when no-one even attempted delivery.
    • Yes, this thread has got weird.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...