Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you already posted that nonsense on another

> thread. If workers want to protect rates of pay,

> they need to unionise and take on employers. It's

> not the Pole or the Turk (and there are lots of

> Turkish people already living and working here

> btw) who set rates of pay, but the employer in a

> buyers market. Lots of people have been laid off

> only to see their old jobs readvertise at lower

> rates of pay, often employing younger people, who

> are cheaper to employ as well.

>

> So they EU are shafting working people are they?

> Workers have the following protections because of

> the EU;

>

> Health and safety at work: general rights and

> obligations, workplaces, work equipment, specific

> risks and vulnerable workers.

>

> Equal opportunities for women and men: equal

> treatment at work, pregnancy, maternity leave,

> parental leave protection against discrimination

> based on sex, race, religion, age, disability and

> sexual orientation.

>

> Labour law: part-time work, fixed-term contracts,

> working hours, employment of young people,

> informing and consulting employees.

>

> Individual EU countries must make sure that their

> national laws protect these rights laid down by EU

> employment laws (Directives).

>

> And then of course there's the people kept in jobs

> by the ?200bn of exports to the EU annual.

>

> Yeah right, whatever has the EU ever done for

> working people.



I'm hardly ever on here any more, couldn't take the growing reactionary, right-wing leanings but nipped in for a quick perv and felt a happy glow when I read this (and other posts by Blah Blah).


I hope you have the energy to continue calmly rebuffing the aforementioned for many years to come :-)

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Expat has connotations of impermanence.


Not that I've ever heard of. An expat is merely someone who is not currently living in their home country. That would cover those that are away on a longish-term basis as well as those, like me, who are permanent. I am an expat, an immigrant and an emigrant.

All those workers' rights and industrial relations would have happened here anyway - England has been at the forefront of that sort of progress since Victorian times- e.g. Equal Pay Act 1970 which is before the EU....

It's a pity really that there is such a plethora of cheap building labour because some of the eyesores around East Dulwich and elsewhere would never have been built if there hadn't have been.

I agree that they are all fundamentally the same. My point is that people choose to use these terms (that mean the same thing) selectively on certain groups which gives them additional shades of meaning. Polish immigrants are almost never called expats. Americans living in London are almost always called expats. There is a reason for this.


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Expat has connotations of impermanence.

>

> Not that I've ever heard of. An expat is merely

> someone who is not currently living in their home

> country. That would cover those that are away on

> a longish-term basis as well as those, like me,

> who are permanent. I am an expat, an immigrant

> and an emigrant.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LondonMix Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Expat has connotations of impermanence.

>

> Not that I've ever heard of. An expat is merely

> someone who is not currently living in their home

> country. That would cover those that are away on

> a longish-term basis as well as those, like me,

> who are permanent. I am an expat, an immigrant

> and an emigrant.


Clearly it means whatever people want it to mean. To me it conjures up images of yuppies in Singapore for two years on tidy, tax efficient packages. Which is why I'd never use it to describe myself - I'm dumb enough to pay all my tax in London. It seems a bit try hard, unless you're actually on a secondment somewhere exotic, tar me with that immigrant brush please.

Pretty much agree with miga/LM, the dictionary definitions may be almost interchangable, but the connotations are different. The word "expat" is never used to describe someone trying to escape from poverty or war. The word "immigrant" is never used when Sony send a senior manager to Weybridge. Clearly there is a large intersection... e.g. Aussies in London (cultural refugees?)


But it's based on circumstances, not skin colour.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's a pity really that there is such a plethora

> of cheap building labour because some of the

> eyesores around East Dulwich and elsewhere would

> never have been built if there hadn't have been.



You might well be right about that - construction is something I know nothing about - but I'm intrigued;


Do you believe that cheap foreign labour (which let's be honest has been around for a long time - think about the Irish labourers who were common here in the mid 20th century for example) undermined existing British employees who then lost work, or did it fill a skills gap that came to exist because successive governments (and Blair was the worst for this I agree) undermined the vocational and apprenticeship schemes upon which solid training was built?


It's my belief that in the UK we are reaping what we sowed; I had a boss years back who in his youth had worked at Vauxhall (I think) in the Midlands during (again, I think) the seventies. He told stories of drinking and smoking weed at work which made my hair stand on end, and said that on top of it all the unions ran rings round the owners, totally without cause. He wasn't surprised when the contracts went overseas and the plants suffered.


Let me be clear - I am a full supporter of the existence of properly run unions which work for the benefit of their members, and we can agree I'm sure that a lot of what happened in the seventies was unions biting off their nose to spite their face. I think however that it started there - this culture of entitlement and expectation amongst (some, not all) young workers. Compound that with a loss of those training programmes which would've shown them how to do a good job and be employable, and you have perfect conditions for outsiders to come in and take the jobs.


It's too easy to blame immigrants; I think we have to face facts and realise that we did a lot of this to ourselves, despite some people along the way saying "this is a bad idea".

Thank you LadyD. I will have energy as long as people need fighting for.


Uncleglen. You have no way of knowing that and every piece of evidence shows that a freer market means less regulation, including regulation that protects employees. Just look at those Tory cabinet ministers who are for Brexit. Do you really believe that people like Piri Patel and Iain Duncan Smith want to protect employees rights? There is no logic whatsoever in the idea that we don't need the EU for those protections - especially when we are talking about Tory government.

Just take the process of state legislation the Conservatives are introducing to prejudice migrants for example. First they set about laws to make migrant mobility more difficult. Then they've sought laws (in the EU) to make it harder for migrants to make a living (by taking away the same in work benefits that all British workers get) and they are now passing a law to make it a criminal offence to house a migrant who is illegally here.
It's the same process that totalitarian states use to prejudice groups of people - the National Socialists being the most extreme example perhaps. But they did the same thing. First they restricted the mobility of Jews. Then they made it difficult for them to make a living, and then they took away their property and made it a criminal offence for Germans to house them. See the parallels in thinking there? We should be very concerned by all of this.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Such an intelligent comment Maxxi.


Ah, I see. Not intelligent enough to have an opinion... where exactly does that figure on your scale of the 'untermensch' you deride for not agreeing with your vision of the new world order?

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Godwin's Law is just a bit of fun. To assume

> drawing an analogy with National Socialism

> automatically renders a debate lost is stupid.

>

> My analogy was valid and relevant to the topic.


No it wasn't - we haven't had a World War 15 years ago that we lost, followed by such a deep economic crisis we use money for wallpaper, and crippling reparation payments pushing us further under water. Anti-semitism is a minority passtime, not a general feeling these days. Human rights are enshrined in law, and even though the economy is in slow decline, if you work, you eat. Even if you don't work, you eat.


But more than that, every time you compare a bigot to a Nazi, they will switch off, and label you a communist in their head, thereby totally missing the opportunity to make them consider an alternative view.


Further, I think concerns around migration have a basis in reality, but they're not best addressed by comparing people's views to the dawn of Nazism.


That's the humour of Godwin's law. People on the internet get apoplectic with rage, and then they thump down the big word. And then the discussion can go no further, because no one really wants to argue whether their views are analogous to Nazism, not even Nazis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...