Jump to content

Brand New Winterheat Ceramic Panel Heater Lovely ambient heat


Bajanbelle

Recommended Posts

Purchased last year, never used. Bought two but only needed one they are so good at distributing the heat and it is a very pleasant ambient heat, not at all like radiators or drying. Cost ?95, will sell for ?65ovno


Can deliver locally


See link below for current pricing and description:


https://www.sitebox.ltd.uk/winterheat-veneto-425w-ceramic-panel-heater-oelco_whcph01


Winterheat Veneto 425w Ceramic Panel Heater

Overview

? Code: WHCPH01

? Made from plaster

? Ceramic heater.

? Super slim compact design.

? Thickness: 11mm

? Easy to use

? Power LED indicator with ON/OFF switch

? Wall mountable

? Easy installation to fix onto the wall

? Can be painted to match any d?cor


Technical

? Wattage: 425W

? Height: 600mm

? Width: 600mm

? Depth: 11mm

? Colour: White (can be customised)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • According to https://www.compass-pools.co.uk/learning-centre/news/the-complete-guide-to-swimming-pool-maintenance/: ... "Your weekly tasks should include: ...  Checking the pH levels and adjusting the water balance ... The ideal pH rating of swimming pool water is between 7.0 and 7.6. Anything lower than 7.0 and metals and pool finishes can start to corrode, while anything above 7.8 and there can be issues with scaling due to calcium salts in the water and chlorine becoming ineffective." And for comparison of different pH values, see for example the examples chart at https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/z38bbqt#zb2kkty There are several other sites that can easily be found that say something about variation and correction of pool pH levels.  
    • Perhaps we should all ask Lord Ali to help out as he does seem to help out those that make these charges?
    • I find it worrying that the pH problem was considered  bad enough for the pool to be closed. Something must either have been wrong with the water going into the pool in the first place, or something was added afterwards which shouldn't have been, or in the wrong quantity? Whatever, surely there should be checks every time a change of any kind  is made to the water, and appropriate action taken? Or was this closure a result of such a check? In which case, I wonder what went wrong?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...