Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Also there are only two ways that private land owners can enforce no parking, and that is by fines and PCNs (clamping is no longer legal) or by physically restricting access by gate/ lock/ barrier. So if the landowner wants to enforce unauthroised parking/use, the only option they have is to hire a parking enforcement company/gate keeper. This is how commercial premises control parking on their land.
I am in complete agreement with you Richard, the behaviour of that woman is wholly unreasonable and needs to stop. We have has similar encounters on the rare occasion we pick up loved ones and its is very anti-social indeed, nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples cars with no authorisation. I feel there are other personal issues afoot which should not be taken out on the innocent public trying to go about their daily lives.
nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples cars with no authorisation. - Why do you need permission to take a picture, on a private road or not? It makes even less sense if that private road belongs to the person who is taking the photos. Other aspects of her behaviour may well be unreasonable but I cannot see that one falling into that category. If private road rules extend to photography, I'd be happy to be corrected.

So, if I understand it correctly, the lane area is part of the site. But there must be access allowed to the builder's centre. Is it a right of way? Or a flying access only? If it only allows access then we can't park or wait

I agree that it seems normal enough to use it as a pick up point as spider69 says but unfortunately normal and legal aren't necessarily the same.

Talking of access, when can we turn into the side road by Denmark Hill Station. That piece of wood and fence seem to have no real purpose apart from causing trouble on the main road as cars do illegal turns there when dropping off train passengers.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nevermind her taking pictures of other peoples

> cars with no authorisation. - Why do you need

> permission to take a picture, on a private road or

> not? It makes even less sense if that private road

> belongs to the person who is taking the photos.

> Other aspects of her behaviour may well be

> unreasonable but I cannot see that one falling

> into that category. If private road rules extend

> to photography, I'd be happy to be corrected.


edhistory Wrote:


If you had looked at the plans you would have seen that the land in question is part of the old garden centre freehold and runs to the railway cottages boundary.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Anyone doing a renovation soon and want to get rid of an existing kitchen? I'd love to take a couple of units off your hands! 
    • Honestly, sounds like the best thing to do
    • Thanks - going to drop the whole thing now…& put it down  to a bad experience.
    • No, you won’t get your rent back for not having an EPC. I presume you’re thinking of  rent repayment order… you’d have to have evidence of an offence such as illegal eviction, harassment, threat, unlicensed property. None of which you’ve indicated.  I don’t see what the problem is with your situation, certainly nothing substantial. If you have evidence of disrepair (including professional report) and you have to have evidence of informing the landlord as well; you’ve mentioned damp but said it’s not there any more? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...