Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We were told get our little one shown by a pediatrician after all since she is a bit slow in her motor skills.She is 13 months and cant still push her self up and the HV are concerned that her little toes are slightly turned out.So I got a referral letter from the GP and the appointment I was given is for the 12th of March?


Since I heard this toe thing from the HV I ve being feeling S**t , depressed to be honest and I do not know how to wait till the 29 the of march since that is the appointment I was given after all since we are going to Aussi for a holiday on the 13 Feb bla bla.


Does anyone know how to a get an appointment quicker ? sorry may be there is no way ,I have not bing thinking straight for the past few days.


Help please


Sam X

Sam, I know it's hard, but try not to worry too much, especially if it's a HV that's shown concern.


I can't offer any assistance with speeding up the appointment, but can relate - my son couldn't even move until he was 14 months, at which point he started shuffling round on his bottom. He didn't start pulling himself to standing until he was 19 months, at finally walked at 21 months. He rolled once when he was 7 months old, but then didn't do it again until he was 18 months! Thankfully we had a family history of late walking, so I knew not to stress about it too much, but everyone around me drove me mad telling me I should get him seen by someone.


His feet and ankles were very weak so we did get a referral to Kings (with a long wait, like you), but they took one look at him and said not to worry, things would improve once he walked.


He's now nearly 3 and you wouldn't know he was so far behind his peers as he keeps up no problem and is a typical little boy. His ankles are still a bit wonky, but improving every day without intervention.


On the plus side, while all his friends were concentrating on walking, he was focussing on talking, and was a long way ahead of his peers in terms of speech and language.


Try to relax, the appointment will come round before you know it (and chances are by then there will be nothing to worry about).


P x

I'd second Pickle's post in that please try not to worry too much about it (easier said than done I know). My oldest daughter was referred to a specialist physiotherapist when she was about 14 months as she could barely do ANYTHING - she couldn't even get up to sitting from lying down. I had to go and see this physio every couple of weeks to 'monitor her progress' for a couple of months. I was relatively laid back about it as I knew my brother and I were slow physical developers as babies, but my husband worried himself sick, googling every ghastly developmental illness and convincing himself our daughter would never walk.


Needless to say, fast forward a few months and we were discharged as my daughter was up and walking fine, and now she's a perfectly 'normal' healthy little girl. So please do try not to think the worst - health visitors have to cover their own backsides by mentioning anything they think is even vaguely not 'normal' but they are NOT physios/paediatricians and generally you are a better judge of your child than they are. Go private for peace of mind if you can afford it but either way PLEASE don't assume it will be bad news - health visitors have all sorts of boxes to tick and I've met many mums who have been sent down worrying medical paths because of HVs which turned out to be nothing.

Redjam, my son couldn't get from lying down to sitting up either - he first did it when he was 19 months (we still had his cot at the "newborn" highest level as there was no chance of him escaping)!! Benefit of hindsight makes me realise just how easy I had it (having just heard my super-mobile daughter shouting "look at meeeeeee" I went to investigate and found her standing on the kitchen table, aaaaaaargh).


I agree that HV's have boxes to tick, and will be super cautious about anything they don't deem to be the norm. Hence I stopped going to see them ;-)

Ha, yes we never bothered lowering the cot for our first daughter too - and had a similar rude awakening when our second, much more active child came along! And don't get me started on HVs - I also ended up having loads of (in retrospect, unnecessary) trips to hospital for my second child as she wasn't gaining weight well as a baby. Obviously I appreciate HVs have a job to do, and I'm sure they serve their purpose for many, but in both of our cases we wasted a lot of time, energy and worry stressing about issues that turned out to be nothing, simply because our kids didn't quite fit the 'normal' curve. I think if I ever had another kid (god help me, no), I'd give HVs a miss altogether and save myself the stress...

I agree with all the comments about not worrying if possible - most people with kids have had some well meaning person who has scared the living daylights out of them by suggesting something is not right. If you have the paediatrician's name you could always try ringing his/her secretary and asking if there is any way it could be brought forward. No harm in asking. Otherwise if you really are worried a private opinion might help ( prob about ?150 ish for a consultation) but it could end up expensive if you need any tests.

Hope and expect that it will all be a storm in a teacup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's the "due to commercial reasons" line again that is vexing. Last year it seemed, although there was a similar level of objection, that the reasons were commercial - Gala didn't appear entirely prepared to run 3 more events, or more likely didn't have sufficient interest from other promoters / organisers who could 'sub-let' the site as with Brockwell Park (I believe?). This year they appeared more organised, had another year to plan & prepare, to the extent they actually had names for two of the three new events which indicated to me that they had third party promoters / organisers in place.  So yes, it does make you wonder whether the repeated level of objection, combined with the impending elections, led to the council 'advising' that maybe they shelve it again? I'm afraid I can't see the whole extension application just being a ruse to guarantee permission for the 'regular' event. Gala are a commercial venture with ambition - every festival's business plan is to expand, expand, expand, year on year on year. Gala won't give up until they have taken over the whole park for a Summer of Raves, and the mysterious owners are on their yachts counting their ££££
    • Thanks for that. Maybe forthcoming elections have stymied the 7 day request? If Labour get back in, do we think GALA will try with greater success in 2027?
    • Better late than never, same obscure reason as previously for not going ahead with the extended plan... "Due to commercial reasons, the event organisers have withdrawn their application to hold a 7- day event over two weekends. The application has been revised to request the use of Peckham Rye Park to hold a 4-day event over one bank holiday weekend with the following schedule: • Onsite: Monday 11 May 2026 • GALA: Friday 22 – Sunday 24 May • On the Rye Festival: BH Monday 25 May • Off-site Sunday 31 May 2026 This is the same event programme that was delivered in 2025."  GALA 2026 consultation findings report 1519.pdf
    • Do great pizzas there at community cafe.. lots going on — was free parking but plans  to like everywhere get folk to pay.  Nice area… only discovered it a few years ago..   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...