Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jamma Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I could be wrong but I understand this has been

> investigated by RSPCA and they believe foxes

> responsible for most 'attacks'. Would certainly

> explain the huge number of reported incidents. I

> understand some media outlets have had this

> pointed to them but can't resist 'Croydon Cat

> Killer' headlines.


It doesn't explain why foxes themselves have been mutilated & foxes from what I have read don't generally attack cats let alone chop up their bodies & leave them on your doorstep(so to speak)x

The RSPCA did initially believe the deaths could be attributed to foxes, but on the weight of incoming evidence they've had to reconsider.


A breakthrough has been made in the hunt for the Croydon cat killer after tests confirmed mutilated pets had died at the hands of humans, the RSPCA has claimed

http://m.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/14310413._Breakthrough__in_Croydon_cat_killer_hunt_as_RSPCA_says_forensic_tests_confirm_how_pets_were_slayed/


Wouldn't exactly call that a breakthrough, personally :-/ But it's definitely a person, not foxes. :(

ellyblue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



> There is a tabby cat missing where I live (SE15)

> which is close to Chadwick Road wonder if its the

> same one.

>

> my own cat is also missing has been for 3 weeks

> now. Also another cat which looks very similiar to

> mine has also gone missing around the same time

> :-(


Hope you find your cat :(

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A cat has been found mutilated in Forest Hill.

> P.O.U.Sthe wonderCat, is that close enough to get

> a mention on here?


I was just about to say the same thing myself, there is also a possibility of another one in Peckham, but it's not been confirmed yet.

As reported these incidents seem to be increasingly wide-spread, and yet some of the reported modus operandi of the perpetrator suggests some significant local knowledge (with animals being left close to or at the homes of their owners etc.) I wonder whether the same person can credibly be undertaking all the offences, or whether there are either people copying him/ her or whether other incidents are being 'added' to the total of the real and original offender. If there is more than one offender, then any alibi which excluded a possible offender from a particular offence might not then exclude them from all the offences. Mapping software which geo-links offences to look for an epicentre would again not be of so much use, if the 'wrong' offences are being bundled.

As an owner of 3 cats, I worry.

The point of this thread is not to scare people, but to raise awareness, a lot of people haven't heard about the regularity of these killings, people need to tell people in order to spread the word.

SNARL are monitoring and investigating a lot of reports on a daily basis, there is obviously a trait that is happening and or something specific with the finding of the bodies that they are not reporting for obvious reasons.


We need to work as a community to a make people aware and keep cats in at night (when most cats have gone missing) and we also need to raise awareness that we could help find this person by being vigilant and look at people acting suspiciously around animals.


This is a really serious issue and is being dealt with by SNARL, RSPCA and the police, I don't really want to say that this person/ group of people may get to the stage when animal killings are not enough.


Should you find an animal or animal parts please contact RSPCA as a matter of urgency, they will advise what to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...