Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tracymcdavis Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> But not yet clear if all

> > killings around the UK are same person of course

> -

> > heaven forbid there is more than one of these

> > monsters out there.

>

>

> Unfortunately all the publicity is likely to have

> resulted in copy-cat (sorry can't think of a more

> appropriate word) killings by people who were that

> way inclined in the first place :(

>

> I can't believe just one person would travel

> around the country killing cats. Unless they were

> already travelling, for example for work purposes.



SNARL have stated that it is likely the cat killer travels for work. They have also indicated that certain forensic details are intentionally being withheld, so that copycats can be excluded.


The recent arrest unfortunately does not seem to be the serial killer, just a random sicko. :(

natty01295 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sky News;

>

> Police arrest man after five cats killed in

> Northampton

>

> https://news.sky.com/story/police-arrest-man-after

> -five-cats-killed-in-northampton-11197847


This is basically the same info as the BBC article above, and unfortunately this does not currently appear to be directly linked to the serial cat killer. :(


Obviously it's good if an abuser has been caught, but as a killer is still purportedly at large, please stay vigilant. xx

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...
I hope it doesn't mean he's in the area - keep a look out everyone. The description was "he is said to be a white man in his 40s with short brown hair, dressed in dark clothing, possibly with acne scarring to his face. It also says he may be wearing a headlamp or carrying a torch."

I walk my dog in the evening when it is dark. My dog seems to notice all cats/foxes on our walk. I am amazed at how many people leave their cats out at night. Not a cat owner myself but have been aware of these hideous attacks for a long time now.


For goodness sake please bring in your cats, guinea pigs and rabbits. Don't put them in danger, they are precious and rely on their owners to protect them.

Purple Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I walk my dog in the evening when it is dark. My

> dog seems to notice all cats/foxes on our walk. I

> am amazed at how many people leave their cats out

> at night. Not a cat owner myself but have been

> aware of these hideous attacks for a long time

> now.

>

> For goodness sake please bring in your cats,

> guinea pigs and rabbits. Don't put them in

> danger, they are precious and rely on their owners

> to protect them.


Couldn't agree more Purple, all my cats rabbits birds in, I can't understand how the owners sleep at night, guess because it's not escalated to people being mulilated yet. I Like you Purple, a good sensible person.

  • 1 month later...
James, I have sent you SNARL?s response to the article via FB. Unless cars and foxes have learnt to undo bolted cages, kill their inhabitants and then bolt them shut, you will see that there is a sick person out there doing unmentionable things to people?s pets.
James Barber please follow the SNARL website. I?m at a loss to understand why you would actually have faith in this New Scientist tosh. Since when have foxes become so intelligent they carry knives with them, have the ability to use those knives and dismember other creatures. Also why the hell would a superhuman fox have the ability to place a dismembered cat/rabbit/guinea pig etc.in a specific arrangement so as to cause distress to its owners. I really hope that I have read your wording wrong. If so, I apologise. If not, I will not be allowed to post my response.
Has anyone actually read the New Scientist article (apart from James) - seeing as it requires a subscription (which I don't have)? Have you got a subscription to New Scientist Toffee, and have you read the article? If not why are you shrieking heretic at him and calling the article "tosh" without even knowing what it says?
I haven?t read the whole article but if you would care to get off your high horse for once and listen to others opinions, you may see that I have referred to SNARL. No I don?t have a subscription to the New Scientist. do you follow the SNARL website? Have you ever heard of how many family pets have been mutilated. By the way, I assume you have read the article in the new scientist word for word otherwise you wouldn?t be posting your usual pompous opinion. Hold on a minute...you say you don?t have a subscription to it, so how the hell do you know it?s content. You just can?t help yourself from putting me down can you?

Toffee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven?t read the whole article but if you would

> care to get off your high horse for once and

> listen to others opinions, you may see that I have

> referred to SNARL. No I don?t have a subscription

> to the New Scientist. do you follow the SNARL

> website? Have you ever heard of how many family

> pets have been mutilated. By the way, I assume you

> have read the article in the new scientist word

> for word otherwise you wouldn?t be posting your

> usual pompous opinion. Hold on a minute...you say

> you don?t have a subscription to it, so how the

> hell do you know it?s content. You just can?t help

> yourself from putting me down can you?


Yes, I actually said I hadn't read the article, and clearly neither have you. Unlike you, I'm not making assumptions about something I haven't read. I've read SNARL's response but it really isn't a detailed rebuttal at all, it seems to represent the same hysteria that you do that any suggestion there may be an alternative explanation for any of these cases is utter heresy, even though respected organizations such as the RSPCA have suggested the same.


As for not being able to help putting you down, no I really can't help it as it's impossible to respond to any of your comments without putting you down as they're mostly ludicrous. I look forward to you calling me out for a fight again like before.

Just to clarify in general. This is by no means a pop at Rendell Harris. My at is 3 years old. I love him dearly. When I first heard that cats and other animals were being mutilatedin this barbaric why I was mortified. I cannot understand why a human being or beings could bring themselves to do such a thing. There have been many theories over this. But one thingI do know is that the police are very heavily involved in this under the name of operation Takahe. The RSPCA are involved and they too are taking this very seriously. When articles are posted in whatever form. Yes it?s good toreadthem. But I?m sorry,a fox with a knife who has the intelligence to cut another animal precisely, and even remove its inward sand place those inwards on its owners doorstep. Tokilla cat, remove its head. Tail and legs and then place the cats collar on its owners Doorstep. Sorry it?s bad reading.Foxes donotdo this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...