Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello Admin,


There appears to be a problem with the Word Assn. thread (Lounge)...when I add a word, either it doesn't show up at all or, if it shows up on the thread...my post does not show up as "last post" on the list of threads. Or worse, it shows up later (and therefore out of order). Weird! It's been a problem since about Saturday...could it be it is because the thread is so vast?

I'm having a similar prob with other posts where it loads to a blank screen so I refresh for it to say it's already been added but the thread doesn't move up the list or read as a new reply. When you click on the thread itself then you can see there's new responses...

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm having a similar prob with other posts where

> it loads to a blank screen so I refresh for it to

> say it's already been added but the thread doesn't

> move up the list or read as a new reply. When you

> click on the thread itself then you can see

> there's new responses...



yes...that's exactly the problem...only you've explained it far better than I did KK and with less words too!

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I can see that

> people are still posting on it so it seems to be

> ok for now



Sorry Admin. but the point is that it's not OK at the moment...as KK very succinctly puts it...


it loads to a blank screen so I refresh for it to

> say it's already been added but the thread doesn't

> move up the list or read as a new reply.



E.g. at present the list shows:



Word Association Goto Page: 1 ... 182, 183, 184 17126 5497 KalamityKel Today, 06:44PM

Last Post by red devil



but...again, to quote the much more succinct KK...



When you

> click on the thread itself then you can see

> there's new responses...




E.g. at present the genuine last post is shown thus:


Re: Word Association

Posted by: Ladymuck Today, 07:07PM


mighty




So, the true position of last post at 7:08pm by Ladymuck contrasts with what is noted as last post on the thread list (6:44pm by red devil).



Hope this helps. Sorry to be so long-winded by the way. And thank you in advance for your assistance.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM my dear...have patience



ha ha...yes...I don't have a lot of that, I must say...oh well...



Oh, and while I'm here (sorry Admin.)...but...(*laughs*)...please could you tell me why three of my threads were recently removed from the wanted section? I am not too bothered as they were removed after lots of lovely forumites had come to the rescue with their suggestions etc. However, it would have been nice if the threads had remained merely because they contained final messages of thanks to all the forumites who had taken time to respond. Now I don't know whether they caught them in time, but if they didn't, they must think me an ungrateful old cow!

  • Administrator
If titles in that section say things like "now sold" or "no longer required" or similar then they are removed, it just clears the space to be used by live and valid wanted items rather than expired ones. I believe yours said "NOW SORTED" so it was taken off, sorry if it caused an issue.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If titles in that section say things like "now

> sold" or "no longer required" or similar then they

> are removed, it just clears the space to be used

> by live and valid wanted items rather than expired

> ones. I believe yours said "NOW SORTED" so it was

> taken off, sorry if it caused an issue.



no...not an issue at all...I didn't know "the process"...just wondered...thanks for getting back. Merry Christmas xx


PS: who are you? *grins*

  • Administrator
Keef speaks the truth, it is probably a case of starting a new one if it is not working properly as there is nothing we can do behind the scenes. If you do start a new one then the old one will be locked down because the annoyance of having more than one word association thread would be too much to bear.

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef speaks the truth, it is probably a case of

> starting a new one if it is not working properly

> as there is nothing we can do behind the scenes.

> If you do start a new one then the old one will be

> locked down because the annoyance of having more

> than one word association thread would be too much

> to bear.


Go on KK...start a new one...it's your creation so it should be you who starts the new one...I'm addicted, by the way!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM my dearest you do realise that I'm much

> disliked for starting such a thread :-



You are "much disliked for starting such a thread"? Well I find that hard to believe - not by Admin, surely? Furthermore, Admin's post 3 posts previous to this one suggests a new thread might be permitted.


Your thread helps keep the likes of me quiet, assists against the onset of senile dementia, does not lead to pages of whinging, argument or bitching, is inoffensive, and will rarely (if ever) require Admin to intervene (so less work for Admin) etc. etc. But above all...it's fun and completely inclusive. Moreover, it is a huge success. "Much disliked"? Ummm, I don't know about that!


Dear Mark (of admin): please could you reassure our dear KalamityKel that you've no objection to her starting a WA thread Part 2. A Part 2 would, in all probability, resolve the current "loading/updating/display" problems the current thread is experiencing (ironically, as a direct result of its very success). Besides, the more the time I am able to spend posting on that thread...means less time spent creating my own brand of mischief elsewhere...reason enough I would have thought! (*winks cheekily at Mark of Admin*).

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM my dearest you do realise that I'm much

> disliked for starting such a thread :-



You are "much disliked for starting such a thread"? Well I find that hard to believe - not by Admin, surely? Furthermore, Admin's post 3 posts previous to this one suggests a new thread might be permitted.


Your thread helps keep the likes of me quiet, assists against the onset of senile dementia, does not lead to pages of whinging, argument or bitching, is inoffensive, and will rarely (if ever) require Admin to intervene (so less work for Admin) etc. etc. But above all...it's fun and completely inclusive. Moreover, it is a huge success. "Much disliked"? Ummm, I don't know about that!


Dear Mark (of admin): please could you reassure our dear KalamityKel that you've no objection to her starting a WA thread Part 2. A Part 2 would, in all probability, resolve the current "loading/updating/display" problems the current thread is experiencing (ironically, as a direct result of its very success). Besides, the more the time I am able to spend posting on that thread...means less time spent creating my own brand of mischief elsewhere...reason enough I would have thought! (*winks cheekily at Mark of Admin*).

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LM my dearest you do realise that I'm much

> disliked for starting such a thread :-$


No, KK I don't realise that at all. You know, (ahem...and I speak with experience here) you are never going to be able to please all of the people all of the time. Your WA thread pleases most of the people most of the time...and I think you are just going to have to accept that. Personally, I think your thread is a huge success...hence the loading/display problems which, ironically, are symptoms of that success. Admin have indicated that you may start a new thread:


"...it is probably a case of starting a new one if it is not working properly as there is nothing we can do behind the scenes..."


so go for it..."Word Association Thread Part 2". As I said before, it's your fabulous creation...no one else should do it.



*places tongue firmly in cheek*

Mick Mac: I cannot possibly imagine you getting "told off"! Never! *big grin*

I can't see any that have been 'deleted' by admin on that thread.


Three possibilities spring to mind, one of the admins accidentally hit the 'delete' button (we don't ever do that as a rule we just make them invisible to mortals for moments like this), it didn't post because there was a blocked word (we used to have this problem with specialist because it contained the word cial!s), or there was one of them there t'interweb hiccups that just happens every now and then.


Go ahead and give it another go and sorry for any inconvenience.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...