Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

You can change your password by clicking the link that says "Change Password" on the left.

The change username option is only available irregularly for a brief period when someone has to change their name for security reasons. It is difficult to administer so we do not do it very often.

Well I've been accused of writing a paranoid posting by someone whose name does not contain any letters but only symbols. Perhaps it's he who used to be known as Prince. I felt like a name change to reflect the fantasy land I exist in whilst communicating on a forum where for all I know every other character could be computer generated. I'm like this everyday!
  • Administrator

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair enough but I changed mine without requesting it. Was my security at risk?


Did you have to change your name for security reasons?

If yes, then yes.

If no, then no.

hibbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'bout now Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > .

>

> Stop



ha ha ha - love it hibbs


Sean, come on...if you can't beatem...:))


Edited to say: In fact Sean, all you have to do is to substitute the word "periods" with "points"...hee hee

  • Administrator

Hi KalamityKel


A message has been put up in the ED issues/gossip section to remind people to behave


and hi Zaardvark


There was drop off in users returning but they seemed to return in the new year, see here


http://eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/images/edfstats12126.jpg


Here's some other stats for you:


We now have 13,494 registered users of which 10,192 have posted.

In the last month there have been1,827,278 page views

9:35 minutes is the average time on the Site

Last Monday there were 2,989 unique user on the site (it is about 2,800 a weekday average, 2,300 at the weekend)


I hope that answers your question

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...