Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank you James for reporting that the inquest has finally taken place. How that poor family, driver and witnesses have coped with the awfulness of the situation I really can't imagine. James I wonder if you can explain why it has taken 2.5 years to get to the conclusion of the inquest. I know many people at the time felt very strongly about the role the protracted roadworks played in the accident and although its no comfort for the family I hope lessons can be learnt from the way the roadworks and pedestrian safety were managed. Given this I don't understand why this has taken such a long time and feel the messages about missed opportunities should have been relayed sooner.


Do you get a sense that Southwark will use the verdict to look at how they respond to roadworks at such major junctions? Particularly in regards monitoring progress of work and ensuring adequate safety mechanisms are in place?


I do know you care deeply about this matter and remember at the time a conversation we had about the incident and I am pleased you have continued to take an interest in this matter. I will of course look at the link you have provided but hope you as a local councillor will also continue to get Our own local authority to look closely at how they can provide additional safeguards when lights are out of action!

Hi malleymoo,

I remember at the time how awful I felt about it. Someone who helped at the scene called me up and the description was harrowing second hand.


I'm at a loss for why it has taken so very long. I don't understand. I'll try and find out.


Afterwards I asked and pushed Southwark officials for pedestrian phasing on such temporary traffic lights and have since seen them a number of times implimented. When I havent seen them once or twice I've chased up for them.

The coroner wants DoT to ensure nationally this happens. Assuming they used rule 43 then the DoT has 55 days to respond.


Hence the improtance of asking MP's about it so they can add a little pressure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...