Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For over a decade now men and women have been judged by the size of their mobile phone. In the early naughties everyone in classrooms and offices alike was terrified of being lumbered with a phone that would invoke that embarressing shrill: "Ha, ha. Look at the size of that brick. You could slip a disc humping that thing about!" Now it seems, with the introduction of the miraculous iphone that size is no longer an issue when purchasing a new phone.


But to get a fair picture of current trends, we have to look at each genders requirements in detail.


Men, as practical creatures, have traditionally favoured strong and sturdy equipment in order to 'get the job done'. So the length and girth of the early Nokia 2110 with it extendable ariel and no-fuss keypad certainly impressed the others with it's strong silent exterior that held a complex inside no one quite yet understood. It also gave off the impression you were amply provided for if you carried it in your trouser pocket.


Women, as decisive creatures, have always stood firm by the daintier of mobiles. This is dictated not by any means of practicality, but simply because they want more room in their handbags. Pretty obvious really.


However...


With the recent availability of the internet from service providers, a new trend is now emerging, a compromise, for the sake of argument. Although many still strive to find that phone the size of a fingernail, most are now settling for middle ground hovering around the 5 inch region for length by about 3 inches in width. A startling comparison to earlier generations who saw no shame in strutting about with a seven incher.


So today, although noted, size is debatable at best. So the old cliche still stands: Quality over quantity.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9285-does-size-really-matter/
Share on other sites

I was being facetious.

Sorry.

The opening statement "For over a decade now men and women have been judged by the size of their mobile phone" got me because you don't state your sources, and it seems like it's just your opinion.

Then you go and talk gender. And the stereotyping thing never works. Foe starters this woman doesn't have a handbag. Blackberries are bigger than most regular mobiles but I would say in my non scientific experience more women have them than men.

It's a bit "so what" as a discussion in my humble opinion.

"I was being facetious. Sorry."


Not at all Rose...not at all.


"The opening statement "For over a decade now men and women have been judged by the size of their mobile phone" got me because you don't state your sources, and it seems like it's just your opinion."


Nuts magazine and the British Medical Journal.


"Then you go and talk gender."


Have to have both sides Rose, can't let them accuse you of being bias now can you.


"And the stereotyping thing never works."


Have you ever read Nuts magazine?


"Foe starters this woman doesn't have a handbag."


Really? Why, what's wrong with you?


"Blackberries are bigger than most regular mobiles but I would say in my non scientific experience more women have them than men."


Woah there little lady. Have you ever encountered a Nokia 2110? They build houses with 'em these days.


"It's a bit "so what" as a discussion in my humble opinion."


Yeah, so sue me.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nope, my mobile goes in a pocket deep down in my

> waterproof trousers and I set it to vibrate.

> What with that and the nice little vibrate under

> the seat, who needs men or any of their appendages

> including their mobiles?



Oh my Lawd!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
    • Hello, I lost a babies blanket between Tessa Jowell and the Picture House on Lordship Lane 😞It is teal colour with the name Cillian embroidered on it.  If anyone sees/finds it please let me know.  Thank you! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...