Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For your homework RH would you find out if it's

> possible for all 6 teams to end up with the same

> number of points?


If you think I've got nothing better to do...you'd probably be right. Not sure if it can be done with "regular" results, but chuck in a couple of draws and with these results every team would end on fourteen points:


WEEK ONE

Scotland 2 v Ireland 4

England 4 v France 1

Italy 2 v Wales 4


WEEK TWO

Italy 2 v Ireland 4

Wales 0 v England 4

France 4 v Scotland 2


WEEK THREE

Scotland 2 v Wales 4

Ireland 4 v France 2

England 4 v Italy 2


WEEK FOUR

Wales 4 v Ireland 0

Italy 5 v France 2

England 0 v Scotland 5


WEEK FIVE

Scotland 3 v Italy 3

France 5 v Wales 2

Ireland 2 v England 2

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rh: Ireland losing to Wales, and also to England

> away.

>

> That will be interesting.


Well, now they draw to England! All theoretical - I don't really believe there will be two draws on the final day. I have a feeling, if the teams remain roughly as they were for the autumn internationals, that England Ireland will depend on the weather as much as anything, a mucky rainy day in Dublin and England will keep it tight and edge it, a nice mild spring day and Ireland will throw it around a bit and should exploit the fact that (I think) England still haven't got the middle of the back line sorted.

You did see my post Rendel didn't you?



rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rh: Ireland losing to Wales, and also to

> England

> > away.

> >

> > That will be interesting.

>

> Well, now they draw to England! All theoretical -

> I don't really believe there will be two draws on

> the final day. I have a feeling, if the teams

> remain roughly as they were for the autumn

> internationals, that England Ireland will depend

> on the weather as much as anything, a mucky rainy

> day in Dublin and England will keep it tight and

> edge it, a nice mild spring day and Ireland will

> throw it around a bit and should exploit the fact

> that (I think) England still haven't got the

> middle of the back line sorted.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Six nations coming up. I'm looking forward to a good game between Scotland and Ireland though Sexton has been ruled out. Glasgow play an exciting brand of rugby and Ireland have changed their style too. The 4 writers in The Times on Sunday predicted no one to win the Grand Slam and 3-1 England/Ireland to win overall.


I read another article by one of them who doesn't think the new (to the 6N's) points bonus points system will make any difference in terms of tries scored. We'll see. I prefer it to simple points difference deciding the overall winner as happened a couple of seasons ago. If there's one weak team and there usually is, by the time the last game comes around they are usually weaker still and prone to conceding a lot of points.

Agree - the last day games were great and amazingly some very close points difference finishes - but I think the bonus points system will be fairer.

Someone often hammered Italy on the last day, like Wales did last year (and Ireland did in previous years), which under the old system gives too much of an advantage.

Will be interesting to see how it pans out.


In trying to compare to previous tournaments, they could be comparing the table after 4 games (rather than just the finished table), to see if going into the last set of fixtures brings the same level of anticipation/excitement. I don't know if that's been done.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree - the last day games were great and

> amazingly some very close points difference

> finishes - but I think the bonus points system

> will be fairer.

> Someone often hammered Italy on the last day, like

> Wales did last year (and Ireland did in previous

> years), which under the old system gives too much

> of an advantage.

> Will be interesting to see how it pans out.

>

> In trying to compare to previous tournaments, they

> could be comparing the table after 4 games (rather

> than just the finished table), to see if going

> into the last set of fixtures brings the same

> level of anticipation/excitement. I don't know if

> that's been done.


Wales gained nothing from that as the match was played first.


If matched were all played simultaneously it could have seen Wales gaining.

Sorry - it was two years ago - my mistake.



Wales certainly didn't deserve to win that year's 6 nations (imo) on any reasonable basis and a try fest against Italy is possibly the reason for the rules changing.


In fact it was a "dull" defensive performance by Wales against Ireland that year, that prevented Ireland winning the GS.

But i'm not bitter.


Now we have Andy Farrell, we can do dull and defensive too.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry - it was two years ago - my mistake.

>

>

> Wales certainly didn't deserve to win that year's

> 6 nations (imo) on any reasonable basis and a try

> fest against Italy is possibly the reason for the

> rules changing.

>

> In fact it was a "dull" defensive performance by

> Wales against Ireland that year, that prevented

> Ireland winning the GS.

> But i'm not bitter.

>

> Now we have Andy Farrell, we can do dull and

> defensive too.



Wales claim to have abandoned Warrenball now but ...

We'll see.


Howley can be very conservative and isn't that popular.

Lets see how Wales look first. England go there next. The England set up's mantra of 'we want to be the no.1 team in the world' sounds like it's a form of brainwashing I've heard/read it so much. It doesn't mean they will be.


Anyway, who hit Eddie or did he really fall in the shower?

  • 3 weeks later...
I don't think I have ever been as amused by the 1st half of a game of rugby as I was on Sunday. And Eddie's muttering would put any decent whinging pom to shame. I always told my ex forward playing brother that forwards are thick. If he ever disputes it again I'll send him the tape :)

I think Eddie Jones has lost a lot of respect over his response to this.


To say: "Those are the rules and we adapted much better in the second half" would have been a better response.


I honestly thought rugby, unlike football, was above all this whinging.


If you want to push for a rule change, do it quietly through the correct channels, not through the media.


I also think England could have done without this. It's going to provide future opposition with a lot of powder.

I played at a reasonable level until I was 34 and I must admit I had no idea that if it was only the tackled player on the ground there was no offside! But then international players really should be more aware of the rules, especially as it seems Italy are not the first high level team to come up with the idea. If England had been on the ball they should have just started sending Care sniping up the middle with Itoje and Brown on his shoulders, Italy would have had to change their tactics or ship 50+ points, I reckon.


It was pretty funny, though a bit unedifying as a spectacle - not a game I'd show to someone in my quest to prove it's the best team game ever!

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I played at a reasonable level until I was 34 and

> I must admit I had no idea that if it was only the

> tackled player on the ground there was no offside!

> But then international players really should be

> more aware of the rules, especially as it seems

> Italy are not the first high level team to come up

> with the idea. If England had been on the ball

> they should have just started sending Care sniping

> up the middle with Itoje and Brown on his

> shoulders, Italy would have had to change their

> tactics or ship 50+ points, I reckon.

>

> It was pretty funny, though a bit unedifying as a

> spectacle - not a game I'd show to someone in my

> quest to prove it's the best team game ever!


Apparently there is a local offside (a few feet around the tackle)


But not for the backs loitering


I''d just have gone straight to pick and drive until the Italians put

players in - it's not just Wales who can't think outside the plan then :)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Apparently there is a local offside (a few feet

> around the tackle)

>

> But not for the backs loitering

>

> I''d just have gone straight to pick and drive

> until the Italians put

> players in - it's not just Wales who can't think

> outside the plan then :)


Ah, that's what Poite meant when he said "One metre around the tackle."


Yes it was hilariously obvious what they should do, I've just been watching some clips - in possession, six men together, only two Italians in front, turning round to pass back and complaining there are Italians in the way!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So does anybody know why all these police were there, apart from doing their shopping at Tesco  and keeping warm with their car engines running (to be fair, you can hardly blame them for that, this weather)? Are they still there? How many of them are/were there? Has nobody asked them what they are doing there, rather than asking on here?!
    • It's called a steak out, now. Get with it   x
    • From your last post @malumbu it's obvious that the police on crystal palace road are on a stakeout looking for you ..... 
    • William, a farmer, farming with both his parents who are in their 80s, summed up the nonsensical approach the government is taking on farmers on Question Time tonight when he said: "At the point at which inheritance tax becomes due you aren't in a position to pay it without selling an income bearing asset which then destabilises the very entity you have built up to create a profit from". He summed it up beautifully when he closed: "If this policy were to persist it will materially and existentially destabilise our [the county's] farming business " The biggest clap of the programme came from the ex-NFU president who accused the government panelist: "Why aren't you going after the wealthy investors, the private equity businesses that are buying up land, planting trees, offsetting their green conscience. You've done nothing to them. They're the ones driving up land prices. These farmers do not want to sell their asset....they want to invest in it and this is going to stifle investment. Who is going to want to invest in new buildings as that is going to drive up the value of the estate." "You're going after the wrong people". It's amazing that the government have been daft enough to pick a fight with farmers - Alastair Campbell commented that he did react with shock when it was announced in the budget as, he said, you don't start a fight with farmers.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...