Jump to content

Rugby matters

Narnia

By Narnia
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

Most annoyingly I thought Davies had lost it for Wales and was hoping he would be feeling thoroughly ashamed at himself.

Despite the subsequent citing this kind of lets him off and gives him the excuse to say 'they're just as bad, harumph'.


I tenhd to agree that erring on the side of caution is probably for the best, especially if there is a 0 tolerance approach to stamp this sort of thing out.

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

x post.


A minefiled it may be, but I guess a natural consequence of the changing shape of the game over the last 15 years.

The beigger they are the harder they do fall and serious injuries have been rising as a consequence meaning you have to regulate to try and protect the players, though I get what you're saying about it being hard to judge for a player in the middle of a blood and guts encounter.

david_carnell

david_carnell

Posted
Posted

Well quite. A big hit is something the crowd love to see and gets your team mates fired up. A back row forward hits a small(ish) back at full tilt and 9 times out of 10 the smaller fella is going to be lifted off the ground. Now you just can't govern for that in a full contact sport played by near 20 stone pro athletes. We all know that spearing is dangerous and that a tip tackle isn't great but a red card for both seems unequal.


When you think a few years back that Umanga got away with a tour ending spear on O'Driscoll during a NZ v Lions game and now we have players being cited for what Ferris did we've gone from one extreme to another.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No undersoil heating in Paris. Bet this game gets

> postponed. -7 predicted, possibly -10 when game

> starts at 9pm local time. According to Clerc the

> touchlines were frozen when they played Italy.Not

> good.



You win your bet!

taper

taper

Posted
Posted
England look as poor as I've seen them since the late eighties. That said, I reckon the positives are there. The two props have been outstanding. Robshaw is worthy of his berth. And Morgan looks good. I think if Lancaster has the balls to drop Youngs, Dowson and sort out the midfield they might compete with Wales and Ireland.
david_carnell

david_carnell

Posted
Posted

I've got to agree with Alan. England have played the (seemingly) two worst teams in the tournament so far and scraped wins over both whilst not looking fluid or consistent.


Three losses in the next three would not be a surprise.


But I think that's ok. If we learn from each and progress then the future could be bright with lots of new, promising players being blooded and gaining experience ready for the Autumn internationals against the Southern Hemisphere teams. And we need to make progress fast otherwise those will be truly frightening.


Front row looks good although Hartley is not the most consistent thrower from the line out. Useful in the loose though and has calmed his temper.


Botha seems to have a good work rate and should play well alongside Lawes when he returns from injury. Palmer needs to improve to keep a place.


The back row is competitive. Haskell, Croft, Robshaw, Woods, Morgan and Dowson are all decent but we lack a true out and out 7.


Dickson improved things massively with quick ball when he came on at scrum half against Italy. He should start with Youngs dropped.


Hodgson has played well enough to keep Flood out of the team when the latter returns from injury. He also has the experience needed for a young back line.


Midfield is tricky. Barrit has played well but Farrel's kicking is superb and we need that. When Tuilagi returns it will probably be at Barrit's expense. I'd like to see more of Turner-Hall too.


Ashton and Strettle need to see more of the ball but appear to be first choices on the wings. Sharples should be pushing for a place.


Foden had a dreadful game and it might be worth giving Brown a full 80mins to show his worth.


How did the Saxons do btw?

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

Highly entertaining game for the neutral yesterday.


The Scotch people certainly have reasons to be optimistic after far too many years in the doldrums. Weird they reserved their best spell of play when they were ma/en down.


Wales a little inconsistent and a little lucky, but great to watch and am inclined to agree that Wales France will decide it this year.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted
With the Ireland France game probably being played between rounds 3 and 4 it will mean both countries will have test matches for 4 weeks in a row. That's a big ask for Ireland in particular. By the time they get to Twickenham they will either be exhausted or rotating players. Mind you if the French clubs have their way it will be played in June!
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...