Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yellow lines = parking ticket

> Double yellow lines = parking ticket

> Red line = parking ticket

> Double red lines = parking ticket and

> indeterminate prison sentence

>

> See...not hard to work out is it ?


Jimmy Two Times - Perhaps you could pass your logical approach onto the traffic wardens.


Park your Southwark Council vehicle on a corner to give someone a ticket = face disciplinary action for making the roads more not less dangerous

Park your Southwark Council vehicle blocking a disabled ramp = face disciplinary action for making the roads more not less dangerous

Park your Southwark Council scooter in a loading bay = face disciplinary action for making a mockery of the point of the loading bay

Treat people like sh*t = lose the respect of everyone who you encounter every day.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parking wardens are usually foreign workers who

> only do this job because it's all they can get.

> Quite often they are very educated people, yet

> they have to put up with all sorts of terrible

> abuse. I rarely ever get parking tickets, and do

> you know why? Because I pay attention to parking

> regulations. It's not hard.

I totally agree with you, but as I am in My shop on Melbourne Grove, I do watch them sometimes, and they break all the traffic laws there are. They are often parked on the curb, which by the way is an immediate ?80 fine, they are forever stopping on the yellow lines,double parking and parking in dropped curbs, as well as taking up space in the free bays for a quick nap, which stops other people being able to park!

Surely they must practice what they preach.

I watched a programme about them a few weeks ago where they had hidden cameras on their hats. The abuse they received was an absolute disgrace. I could not be a traffic warden cos if anyone ever talked to me like that I'd deck them.
Someone earlier made the point that parking regulations in parts of London are very complicated, giving this example www.barnetresidentsassociation.org.uk. To be fair though, I know it's got a lot of numbers in it, but it's perfectly clear. It says you can park Mon to Sat between 9.30am and 4.30pm if you buy a ticket (max 1 hour). Parking is free through the night 6.30pm to 8.00am, and all day Sunday. Another slightly different rule applies to loading. And there's an arrow pointing you to the nearest ticket machine.
Southwark Council are making a lot of money from this outrageous scam. Originally these wardens were employed to HELP the community but are now just tax collectors. I don't condone any abuse but that is a separate issue to the cynical use of commercial wardens who's remit is to maximise the councils revenue by hindering it's citizens. It is really quite disgusting. Perhaps we should remind our selves that the council is there to serve US and not just "dip their beaks" where ever they see opportunity.

My two pennyworth of advice - make sure that your car is registered to your home address.

Easy to forget if you've moved.

If you fall foul of a traffic camera - enter congestion zone without realising ,cross that no entry sign at top of Rye Lane - you probably won't even realise that you've incurred a fine .

You won't get the reminders which will go to your old address and before you know it one of those automatic readers that logs your license plate will trigger a whole load of grief in outstanding fines,baliffs costs ,car removal.

There is no need to even enter into any form of dialogue with the parking wardens let alone abuse them. Simply appeal against every ticket that you get. A high percentage of these fines and tickets are overturned on appeal. Also if you appeal you don't have to pay until a decision has been made on the appeal.

Try not to lose the ticket. It's not a valid excuse if you find your fines doubled because you failed to pay or appeal.

JTT is right. Appeal every ticket - there are loads of loopholes too: yellow lines should be unbroken; double-yellows should be have a 't-bar' end; signs should be clear and posted a set distance apart and make sure the offence, date and all vehicle and location details are correct, to the letter.


BTW, if you get a ticket from a private car park, such as a supermarket or private land, ignore it - it's completely unenforceable.

"BTW, if you get a ticket from a private car park, such as a supermarket or private land, ignore it - it's completely unenforceable."


True. But do research so that you know how to write the correct wording. There are template letters to be found on various consumer websites.

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> moaning on about the amount you have to pay if you

> park illegally - ridiculous

> If you choose to park where you shouldn't it is

> your own fault.



Garnwba - I don't think anyone is moaning about the amount you have to pay if you park 'illegally'. You maybe need to read the thread properly. People are complaining about the broken process that says that if you forget to pay a ?60 parking fine, you get asked for ?680 by some thug in a bomber jacket, without even getting a reminder letter or a 'please pay now or we will pass this on to debt collectors' letters.


They are also moaning about parking wardens who park dangerously, contravening the parking regulations they are meant to be policing, and who do not realise that sometimes their behaviour is less than anyone would expect from a council employee.

Steady Eddy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After reading this I am so glad I don't have a car

> ::o



You don't need to be a motorist to be affected by this increasing misuse of council powers:


http://www.expressandstar.com/2009/11/12/fined-75-for-feeding-ducks/


http://www.birminghammail.net/news/black-country/2008/04/16/charges-dropped-against-wolverhampton-woman-in-apple-core-litter-case-97319-20773235/

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "BTW, if you get a ticket from a private car park,

> such as a supermarket or private land, ignore it -

> it's completely unenforceable."

>

> True. But do research so that you know how to

> write the correct wording. There are template

> letters to be found on various consumer websites.



Best not to reply - they'll only put you on the 'live one' pile ;-)

A happy day when I got back to the motorcycle and found a parking ticket stuck to the windscreen in an ENVELOPE saying it was a warning only.

I had parked on a boxing day.

A bit like Sat 26th Dec, Westminster Libraries are treating it as a Bank Holiday but Westminster Parking B@stads are NOT.

I ignored the thing and they sent me a reminder. I sent a photo of the official Westminster Parking control envelope.

They said the case is dismissed.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A happy day when I got back to the motorcycle and

> found a parking ticket stuck to the windscreen in

> an ENVELOPE saying it was a warning only.

> I had parked on a boxing day.

> A bit like Sat 26th Dec, Westminster Libraries are

> treating it as a Bank Holiday but Westminster

> Parking B@stads are NOT.

> I ignored the thing and they sent me a reminder. I

> sent a photo of the official Westminster Parking

> control envelope.

> They said the case is dismissed.


You're lucky they didn't pursue the fine - they have a ?17m bad-Icelandic-investment-sized hole in their finances to fill, don't they?

  • 4 weeks later...

I remembered this thread and took this photo of an illegally parked parking enforcement officer on Thursday night.

He was parked on the pavement opposite EDT just off lordship lane


I know that they can park on yellow/red lines etc in the name of 'duty' but are they allowed to park ON the pavement?

Is that even safe???


Anyone any ideas and i'll follow it up if so

R and A I toook a photo recently of these disgraceful pests parked on a double yellow line with one wheel on the pavement. I shall shortly be passing this on to Southwark for their comment.


And Garnwba - as has been pointed out - no one seems to be questionin the amount being charged for "illegal" parking. The beef is about the wardens making nuisances of themselves yet parking willy nilly - and getting away with it. Try to keep up

yep I agree trafiic wardens are Bast***s

I received a PCN for 4 minutes whilst my plumbers van was parked in the loading bay opp Bells Plumbers just off Lordship Lane while I was loading a new hot water cylinder... even though the bay is for loading and you are entitled to 40mins.. explain that one to me someone..

johnh Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yep I agree trafiic wardens are Bast***s

> I received a PCN for 4 minutes whilst my plumbers

> van was parked in the loading bay opp Bells

> Plumbers just off Lordship Lane while I was

> loading a new hot water cylinder... even though

> the bay is for loading and you are entitled to

> 40mins.. explain that one to me someone..


You can definitely appeal that one JohnH. All you need is the invoice or receipt to prove you were loading. Send that with your appeal letter and you should be fine. What is a loading bay for if not for loading..

The Civil Enforcement Officers are nasty pieces of work. I saw the guy who ticketed me for the same thing this afternoon. I thought about walking over and pushing his scooter over (but then the civilised voice in my head told me not to :-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...