Jump to content

Recommended Posts

WHY?


The NHS will be under severe financial pressure for the next 5 - 10 years and probably longer. If everyone campaigned for their local hospital and services to remain exactly where they are, frozen in time there can be no change. While the NHS will always be costly, sensible change will allow it to become more cost effective. With Kings, Guys and St Thomas' all within a 30 minute public transport journey I cannot see a great case for retaining some minor NHS services in a Victorian building that is not fit for purpose at the, metaphorical, "end of my street".


Sensible amalgamation of services in better premises - but within reasonable reach will benefit more people by allowing available funding to be spent more effectively on wider services.


PS: The NHS could also stop funding Homeopathy, Chiropractice, Osteopathy and similar services as well to spend the money on more effective, and evidence based, treatments.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > PS: The NHS could also stop funding Homeopathy,

> Chiropractice, Osteopathy and similar services as

> well to spend the money on more effective, and

> evidence based, treatments.


xxxxxxxx


?? I was very grateful to the osteopath who put me right when I put my back out, but would have been even more grateful if I hadn't had to pay for it - didn't even know it WAS available on the NHS!

Hi Marmora Man,

Kings College Hospital is fine for acute treatment. However, at times it runs out of beds and has had to run Kings College Hospital wards out of disused Lewisham Hospital closed wards. Hardly satisfactory or cost effective. Several East Dulwich residents have talked to me about needing intermediate care but could only receive this at Kings in acute wards. This must be a dreadfully expensive way to provide this intermediate care. Also, they suggested the staff just weren't set up to provide this and those residents were extremely dissatisfied with the service they received.


Dulwich Hospital has been providing intermediate care beds as well as other primary care type services for decades and users have been happy with it.


I don't see costs savings in closing it. I don't see happier tax payers and residents by closing it.


I bet no Kings College Hospital manager has ever shared with Dulwich Hospital staff the bed per night costs they should be aiming for and what they currently cost. If they haven't shared this information its becuase they're not looking for value for money but have prejudged the outcome they want.

For me the key issue is intermediate beds for people who no longer need to be occupying expensive acute beds but are not well enough to go home for whatever reason. Other relevant local PCT and some hospital services could be grouped along with such a facility. I went to the meeting advertised recently by the campaign group and discovered it isn?t about saving buildings per se but precisely about the need for intermediate beds plus other relevant and ancillary services across GP, PCT and hospital facilities. The discussion also included this community hospital being built on the part of the site that has already been demolished, so not just about recycling old buildings. It was still not easy to get the facts clear about the exact position on each part of the site, which authority owns what or even what their plans are or indeed that the campaign group has a sorted out position on those details.


So the bottom line for us locals seems for me - do we press for a facility for intermediate care beds plus whatever makes sensible ancillary provision? I doubt that we will have any chance of that at all without a local campaign for it. Having experienced major surgery in King?s myself in the last few years I am a strong supporter of the provision of intermediate beds as I could see around me and from my own position the need for such a facility. With the trend towards smaller and older households this is a trend that will increase not diminsh.

Smiler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What services are provided at the hospital at

> present?


I have asked for info on this but hasn't arrived. I understand that it is a mixed bad of overspill from elsewhere and offices, and maybe some services that remained from previous times. IE it seems to be currently used as a spare facility without it being a planned coherent mix. That is the impression I got at the meeting, but I haven't got the facts. But I gathered that services for the local community hospital with intermediate beds would be planned from scratch, particularly obvioulsy if it was new buidling on the now demolished half.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree with you Eileen, lets hope there is not a

> darker sub plot, where Southwark just wants to

> sell the land to build private housing on



Just to avoid misunderstanding, Southwark in this case probably means Southwark NHS and not Council. IT is likely that all the land belongs to some bit or other of the NHS. I say likely as I just don't know the facts, but I'd be suprised if this is Council property at all.

Smiler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What services are provided at the hospital at

> present?



They have an x-ray department there, a phlebotomy department to take blood samples, a physiotherapy department and a midwife service. I am sure there are more services available but I don't know which ones. There is also an out of hours GP service available.

In addition to the above there is the Betty Alexander Suite which provides Out patient appointments for older folk including a 'one stop shop'type service for investigations i.e. falls, OT, Physio, Dementia Clinis and general assessment.

Social Services Occupational Therapy service, Social Services Out of Hours Team, Care Home Support Team. SELDOC.It also had a satellite Renal Unit - not sure if that is still there.

Site is owned in most part by Southwark NHS -

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Not sure about changing hands but the Peckham Rye one is open and hasn’t had any random closures. Our child is very happy there but there was a resolved Ofsted complaint half way through last year.  Things don’t look good for the Devon nursery owned by the same company - looks like loads of issues with Ofsted which can be seen in its latest report. 
    • I was in Forest Hill Road today, just past the Rye, and noticed there is a dentist next to the Herne (pub) that has NHS signs outside. I've never had any problems getting NHS dental treatment in East Dulwich, and I get regular check ups. I've been to three  different dental practices here over the years, all with NHS treatment. I think the difficulties are in other parts of the country. Malumbu has a good explanation above. I didn't hear the Radio 4 programme, but I'm guessing that a  radio programme is not going to have time to say where you CAN easily get NHS treatment, and is bound to focus on the negatives and the horror stories, otherwise it would be very boring! ETA: Re children's teeth, I think the major issue is not lack of dentists, it is children being given sugary food, drinks and confectionery which rots their teeth. The education of parents needs to be about this, not just about tooth brushing. And in some cases the poor diet may also be due to lack of money for healthy food. Though of course the lack of dentists doesn't help, if  the tooth rotting can't be rectified by fillings or extraction.
    • Well, I hope you like what you see, the hot air, lack of answers and continual blaming things on the last Government and the made up blackhole, I find are nauseating. The man needs to see reality, because I'd guess that if we had a snap election tomorrow and based on the first six months of this parliament, Labour would get trounced. When the election does finally happen and if that isn't before the people rise up and throw this lot out, Labour will not be voted back in for a millennium.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...