Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 3rd time now somebody has nipped up onto the pavement rally style towards me and 2 small children to get past school traffic at the top of FHR. This is just before the corner junction honor oak park road. Its scary. very instant, drivers make a quick impatient decision and try to do it quick. They know its insane before they do it. Im talking a foot away from my girls. You get to see the passengers face mainly as that side of the car is on you fast. They looked shocked too. Todays idiot had a kid in the back.

Its always chaos up there. The people that park all over the pavement and dble yellow lines up there outside the catholic school just jam it all up. Every known and again you see a few wardens up there. Quite a few mini cabs park there too. Mum stays in back, cabdriver walks child into school. hardcore eh?

So the corner Im tallking about is very jammed as a result of this. Fairlawn school has its own traffic so its a clash up there. Exactly where its becoming lethal.

So, Im getting Rambo'd up about this.

A metal barrier fence (like on the other side) might be an idea. Or a copper up there standing around.

Or me in a suit of flashing lights and a baseball bat looking mean.


Irony here, is theres a small cctv enforcement van just a few yards up with its camera facing the other way. Policing the bus stop and the "do not park here" bit. behind the guys back its going nuts. I mentioned it to the guy. Sadly, a dumbass robot. A droid. Hes only supposed to be watching the bits you can be fine'd on.


When i first realised that road is actually one of the worst roads you could have schools on, the headmaster told me, its true that only when a bad accident happens will anyone take notice.


From what ive seen it wont be an accident. Itll be a murder frankly.

@woodie Cllr Graham has raised speeding and traffic problems in this area with the council a couple of times in recent months but I'll pass this specific case on to both him and Renata (Peckham Rye Labour candidate) as they are both involved with the Community Council Transport sub-committee). The committee met on Weds I think so there might be an update.


@ianr Canonbie, Netherby and Honor Oak Road are all Lewisham but Southwark wraps all the way round to Honor Oak Station but the only properties on the Southwark side of Honor Oak Park are the Oakhill Court flats round the corner behind the school (after the 'Welcome to Lewisham' sign...)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...