Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This throws up some interesting numbers.


https://tfl.gov.uk/fares-and-payments/fares/single-fare-finder


For example, a peak fare from East Dulwich to Kings Cross comes in at ?4.30. However, if one travels from Peckham Rye and avoids London Bridge via some convoluted route, it is possible to travel for ?2.90. So, not only are we provided with a shabby service into London Bridge, but we have to pay a substantial premium on many journeys for the privilege.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/89451-oyster-fares-unfair/
Share on other sites

Absolutely and things can change with enough will. It had been highlighted previously that because of the labyrinthine fare structure in London, kids in North London got free travel ands kids in large parts of South London did not; this was remedied it just needed an agreement between TFL and the rail operators.


I'd like to see something done about adult fares now. I guess that you're a cycle commuter cyclemonkey, and we in particular, the occasional rail traveller, are hit by this.


To provide another example of this nonsense, it's actually a pound cheaper to travel from Forest Hill to Kings Cross than East Dulwich to Kings Cross.


To me that makes a case for all suburban rail within London coming under the management of TfL.



I suspect the next Mayoral contest is going to throw up some interesting stall-setting-out on that front. Labour have all-but-declared in favour already. Some interesting rumblings on the latest Bakerloo report on the ever-well-informed London Reconnections blog:


http://www.londonreconnections.com/2016/extending-bakerloo-not-transport/


From the article:


"This seems to be awfully like a TfL proposal to improve south London lines to provide a more frequent all day service. Generally known as TSLO (pronounced tis-low) it stands for Turn South London Orange. The diagram appears to be part of this long awaited proposal, the details of which have until now, for the most part, been kept strictly under wraps. When it surfaces, we will cover it in detail here."


My guess is, they need to let Thameslink bed in until 2018-9, but once it does, virtually all the longer-distance trains (which TfL aren't permitted to take over) will be "through" at London Bridge. At that point, there's surely a case for TfL to and grab the remaining Southern Metro services which start and end at LB.


If that happens, they can fix the ticketing situation pretty quickly. Actually making the trains more frequent and reliable will take longer, the lead time on new trains is measured in years, but if the Overground operators can get exclusive use of the South Bermondsey & the New Cross slow tracks, that's surely a step in the right direction.

It's a mess. My office is in the City, and I walk down to North Dulwich station to get a train to London Bridge and walk across.


I pay ?712 for a yearly season ticket from North Dulwich to London Bridge. Because it's rail only, I can use it to Blackfriars, London Bridge, Cannon Street, Charing Cross, Vauxhall, City Thameslink and Waterloo East.


That also gives me a 1/3 off off-peak tube fares and rail fares across the SE. And any railcard for ?10 rather than ?30.


If I wanted to use the bus and tube, then I would need a zone 1-2 card for ?1296


Still with me?


So I save around ?800 a year, althogh ?584 at a minimum.

I see that the Greens have highlighted this issue amongst others:

http://www.sianberry.london/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/FaresBriefingJan2016LondonGreenParty_FINAL.pdf


East Dulwich even gets a mention! Hopefully, as Wulfhound suggested, the next mayoral election will lead to improvements.

Wonder if it would be somehow possible if the Overground could be extended from Peckham to Crystal Palace via ED and Tulse Hill?


As it stands now Crystal Palace is a branch of the West Croydon service, so could it go via the above route instead of sectioning off after Sydenham? Brockley/Honor Oak Park would still get the West Croydon service.


The map here will make more sense: https://tfl.gov.uk/cdn/static/cms/images/london-overground-network-map.gif


As I am bored on a Sunday evening a mock up is here: http://s14.postimg.org/58j0sxcz5/Screen_Hunter_30_Jan_10_21_08.jpg I hope it explains the Crystal Palace link in more depth.

Danielson00. That mocked up map is interesting. It seems that the volume of trains through East Dulwich is low and it could take a few extra trains from the Overland.


It shows how a small change can yield interesting results. I've always felt that something like that coupled with East Dulwich -> London Bridge trains running through to Charing Cross would be a game changer.

OK, well Kings's Cross was a somewhat arbitrary underground station, although your suggestion is close to useless at weekends when I do travel there. Try putting in Westminster, Liverpool Street, Angel and many more as alternative stations to demonstrate the original contention.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...