Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi we got a PCN from TFL as our car slipped into the box junction, pictures show us going in and waiting with tail half in the box. We challenged this as there are two box junctions positioned close together between sets of traffic lights outside the Peckham bus garage, but moreover the fact that they are there not to help filter traffic but actually causes problems and for accummulating revenue for the TFL, e.g there is no real right hand turn, the traffic lights are between each box change so increases chance of being caught in them, therefore they are not appropriately placed. We have a hearing tomorrow but wondering if anyone else has had experience of successfully appealing or being fined for going into the boxes. There seems to be ample room for the buses to enter the garage and I do not know why they don't just have a keep clear sign in place or just wait a few minutes like other vehicles, why do buses have special priority? Failing that I was going to challenge them on the amount ?130 which is disproportionate to the offence?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/89142-box-junction-appealschallenges/
Share on other sites

You won't win by saying it's unfair and money making or the fine is too big. You might win if you appeal based on law.


Box junction law is complex. There are a couple of websites out there that cover most of the bases -


http://www.appealnow.com/parking-tickets/yellow-box-junctions/

http://yellowboxjunction.co.uk

https://moneyboxjunction.wordpress.com/


They will give you a good idea on how you might appeal. It's mostly around the fact that the offence occurs when you enter the box, so at that point do you have any clear exit to the box.


A user here called fredricketts I think successfully appealed on a yellow box ticket here. He's not been active here for a couple of years, but sending him an email might work. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,135592,708635#msg-708635


In the case of the bus station yellow box, I suspect (but I don't think this has ever been proven) that it is an illegal box junction. A box junction has the be at the junction of two roads - this is at the junction of a road and a bus garage. It would all depend on whether that entrance to the bus station is legally a road.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The way I understand box junctions, if you enter

> it with the expectation that the traffic ahead of

> you will move and thus make space for you, you can

> appeal it. As Loz says above, the offence occurs

> when you enter the marked area, not once you are

> in it.


That's wrong. You're not allowed to stop in a yellow box (unless turning right). The only way to do that is if you can see enough space on the other side.


The whole point of a yellow box is to keep a clear area, which is also why you find them outside fire station and ambulance depots.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bus station, not a garage; so it is a road

> (restricted to buses, so don't go driving there

> either or they'll fine you!)


The Road Traffic Act 1988 defines a ?road? as "in relation to England and Wales, means any highway and any other road to which the public has access, and includes bridges over which a road passes".


I reckon it worth a try as a part of an argument.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The way I understand box junctions, if you enter it with the expectation that the traffic ahead of

> you will move and thus make space for you, you can appeal it. As Loz says above, the offence occurs

> when you enter the marked area, not once you are in it.


Not quite. If there is a space to exit when you enter, you have a good chance of appeal. So, if someone cuts you up, then you have a good excuse. But if you enter hoping the exit will clear, you won't have much success in appealing.


Bizarrely, on two lane roads, if the other lane is clear and you stop, people have successfully appealed as they were considered to have chosen to stop, rather than were forced to stop (as per the letter of the law)!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a bus station, not a garage; so it is a

> road

> > (restricted to buses, so don't go driving there

> > either or they'll fine you!)

>

> The Road Traffic Act 1988 defines a ?road? as "in

> relation to England and Wales, means any highway

> and any other road to which the public has access,

> and includes bridges over which a road passes".

>

> I reckon it worth a try as a part of an argument.



I see your point. But would you employ the same argument if it were a fire station / ambulance station?

I dont think we can rely on arguing against the fact we did enter and stop in the box although momentarily and partially. Hoping more to argue on the position, purpose therefore validity or legality of the box junctions. Tfl argue that they sought consultation through proper channels. Meaningless to me as its proof of functionality thats important, confusion to public, inadequate traffic management and only serving purpose of lining their purses increaing their revenue is worth challenging. Have checked some of the sites suggested by Loz and tips like what constitutes a road is useful to know. Thanks. The point of whether it would be same argument for an ambulance or firestation is irrelevant as its not, its outside a bus station/garage operated by TFL.
12.9 Yellow box markings may be used outsidepolice, fire, ambulance stations or hospitals only where there is an access road forming a junction with the main road. Where vehicles exit directly onto the carriageway, a KEEP CLEAR marking to diagram1026 or a KEEP CLEAR marking to diagram1027.1 (varied to omit the word ?SCHOOL?) shouldbe usedd.
Good point nashoi and worth noting.TFL objected to our challenge sending a CD of recording our vehicle along with a catalogue of papers defending their position aggressively advising us to pay the now increased charge of ?130. We have tribunal hearing tomorrow for our case to be heard. Therefore useful to arm ourselves with information for our defence.
Attended hearing today and lost. Made our representation with info gathered. His response was basically a contravention has occurred heres the fine to pay. Regarding the box junction rules he said verbatim the authorities can do what they like and put box junction where they like, that cant be used as a defence. I suggest that the location of them results in problems fines profitting TFL which therefore should be removed maybe local MP would like to take up the cause. Disappointed to say the least lost faith in system completely bolstering fat cats.

I kinda have some sympathy as I've been caught out in the same place. It doesn't help that the flow of traffic through there is so volatile, and people seem to drive quite aggressively.


Nevertheless, sounds like you were at fault and to be honest I'm not surprised your appeal was rejected. "Bolstering fat cats?" Who are the fat cats? ?130 might sound like a lot, but doesn't go very far when you think about the whole process of enforcement, issuing fines, appeal, hearing, etc.

The hearing was at London Tribunals. Fat cats i refer to TFL. If they didnt have box junctions in such places to catch people there would be less PCNs and subsequent hearings. Accepted we were caught in the box no doubt about that but the man (judge?)supporting authorities stating they can do what they like and put box junction where they like i didnt accept and i queried thd legality of this. He declined to comment on this.

Here's a freedom of Information request made by a person remarked on above back in 2010


https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/yellow_box_junction_size


I noted


"A total of 3,048 PCNs were issued in the Peckham/High St/Peckham Bus

station for contraventions between 5 January 2010 until 21 August 2010."

You can still appeal the adjudicators decision if, as it seems in this case according to what you say, "the interests of justice require a review" as he/she has ignored the requirements under the Road Traffic Act.


http://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/ruc/your-hearing/making-application-review-adjudicators-decision

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The top front tooth has popped out.  Attempted to fix myself with repair kit bought from Boots, unfortunately it didn’t last long.  Tooth has popped out again.  Unable to get to dentist as housebound but family member can drop off.  I tried dental practice I found online, which is near Goose Green, but the number is disconnected.   The new dental practice in FH (where Barclays used to be) said it’s not something they do.  Seen a mobile dental practice where a technician comes to your home and does the repair but I’m worried about the cost. Any suggestions please? Thank you 
    • So its OK for Starmer to earn £74K/annum by renting out a property, cat calling the kettle black....... Their gravy train trundles on. When the Southport story that involves Starmer finally comes out, he's going to be gone, plus that and the local elections in May 2025 when Liebour will get a drumming. Even his own MP's have had enough of the mess they've made of things in the first three months of being in power. They had fourteen years to plan for this, what a mess they've created so quickly, couldn't plan there way out of a paper bag.   Suggest you do the sums, the minimum wage won't  be so minimum when it is introduced, that and the increase in employers national insurance contributions is why so many employers are talking about reducing their cohort of employees and closing shops and businesses.  Businesses don't run at a loss and when they do they close, its the only option for them, you can only absorb a loss for so long before brining the shutters down and closing the doors. Some people are so blinkered they think the sun shines out of the three stooges, you need to wake up soon. Because wait till there are food shortages, no bread or fresh vegetables, nor meat in the shops, bare shelves in the supermarkets because the farmers will make it happen, plus prices spiralling out of control as a result of a supply and demand market. Every ones going to get on the gravy train and put their prices up, It happened before during lockdown, nothing to stop it happening again. You don't shoot the hand that feeds you. Then you'll see people getting angry and an uprising start to happen.  Hungry people become angry people very quickly. 
    • Eh? Straight ahead of what?  If you turn left at Goose Green, as you also posted above, you end up at the library. Then the Grove. Then, unless you turn right at the South Circular, you end up at Forest Hill!
    • yes I’ve spotted this too — it’s near me and I’m very intrigued to see what it’ll be 👀👀👀👀      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...