Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Quite clearly therefore you agree that the area desperately needs this service"


That's just rubbish R&A, and poor technique. It seems a bit like sounding clever is more important than honesty.


If you go back over this and threads passim, my main complaint is that we actually don't know whether the area needs this service more than than any other area needs their service.


There are fixed budgets here, and the rail authorities need to provide a reasonable service to all.


Instead of facts and clear explanation we've had highly polarised arguments based on self-indulgence. This change in scheduling has been represented as service cutting by faceless administrators with a grudge against Southwark residents. I've questioned the motivation behind such an unreasonable approach.


I propose that if we're a little more grown-up about it, we'll find that everyone is working hard to find the best-fit solution that takes into account everyone's needs.


That means less agitation, and more open-minded investigation. That may not suit the needs of local politicians as election day approaches, but it is more likely to create better solutions.

I was trying to address your point regarding house prices and i'm sorry if i don't have good technique. I'm not a lawyer or a trained debater, i'm a member of the public trying to stick up for a local campaign.


As Boris heads up transport surely it's his job (alongside the transport minister etc) to weigh up the pros and cons for various different areas of greater london. All we can do is put our area's case forward. There's nothing stopping other areas doing the same thing.


I think your point is valid IF we were discussing new services for the area. The facts are the SLL is an established service that is being removed. It's like being forced to reapply for your current job.


I suggested we take this discussion off this thread as we're going round in circles and i feel it's getting personal. Happy for you to PM me or you could start a thread in the lounge...


No wonder Eileen starts a new thread each time .....

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I propose that if we're a little more grown-up

> about it, we'll find that everyone is working hard

> to find the best-fit solution that takes into

> account everyone's needs.


I applaud your trusting attitude Huge not. Daddy knows best.

I am not sure that your attitude is completely grown up either.

;-)


I won't take it offline either - that's just a way to stifle dissent.


I'm clearly not entirely growed-up. This one just rankles.


It's entirely possible that the rail authorities don't have a case. It's also possible that they do have a case, and don't have a s*it hot PR machine. TJMP and Eileen do have a s*it hot PR machine, and it panders to the lowest possible taste.


That makes bad solutions.


Because locals are conflicted on this one, I'm carrying the candle.


I don't like Eileen creating a new thread on this one every time because it's hiding intelligence and debate, it deletes the moderate views. Do you know what, she'll probably create a new thread next time she has some news?


Tessa's on the right political horse in that sense. But respect zero.


Is it worth being in charge if you don't make good decisions?

Well, I'll light a candle for those who do quite like getting different threads when there's news on what's happening.


Otherwise, you end up with an old thread constantly reappearing on the front page. While some people would read all the way through before hitting reply, there are quite a few who don't. They read the first posts and then start replying with questions/answers to things that have long since gone by the wayside. As the thread grows - as it would with an issue that's been running and will run for some time - it gets more and more unlikely that people will go back and reread the full thread. The new news gets buried at the bottom and harder to find and comment on.


I suspect that there's a difference in what Eileen intends her threads to do and what you expect them to do. Does she see them as more of an information posting rather than something to invite and encourage discussion? Perhaps we need a 'community notices' section that 'information only' posts could get slotted into?


I do see your point Huguenot about it being possible that there is more than one community that needs a train service and that someone needs to make the overall decision. But I don't think it's unreasonable that a community shouts about its need - the squeaky wheel gets the oil after all. And there's nothing to stop any other community (or its elected representatives) doing the same. Perhaps we need greater transparency from those making the decision on why they've chosen it (i.e. explaining that greater need and why it outweighs the local one).


I am slightly biased in that I do catch a train to/from Victoria most weekdays and evenings so I'm very grateful to Eileen and co for campaigning and keeping us up to date. And no, it's not about house prices for me - it's about the increased time and hassle of interchanging at Clapham Junction (the UK's 2nd worst station) for commuters at peak (from Wandsworth Road/Clapham High St who don't have the option of the fast trains) and for patients at Kings trying to negotiate the stairs between platforms there.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Huguenot,

Earlier post you suggested rail budgets are fixed.

The subsidy may be but the revenue is not.

At many points on the South London Line the ticket offices are rarely open, no barriers and very rare enforcement - Denmark Hill, South Bermondsey immediately come to mind.

Oyster Pay As You Go starting in early January should help. I suspect the SLL has many more passengers than recorded. Network Rail states underused service yet quite often when I've travelled on it, it feels crowded.

Similar problem to the bendy or 'free' buses.


I'm hopeful that the Oyster PAYG might throw up some surprising passenger usage figures that ensure SLL isn't wrongly dumped.

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you go for the Victoria to Dartford option, any

> chance of asking for it to start running a bit

> earlier?

> It is one of the best ways to get to Canary Wharf

> / Docklands (changing at Lewisham) but the first

> train is 8.31 from Denmark Hill which makes

> getting in early difficult.


Eileen, you are amazing!!! There is now a Dartford train at 7.52am and 8.19am from Denmark Hill. How did you do it?

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gimme Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If you go for the Victoria to Dartford option,

> any

> > chance of asking for it to start running a bit

> > earlier?

> > It is one of the best ways to get to Canary

> Wharf

> > / Docklands (changing at Lewisham) but the

> first

> > train is 8.31 from Denmark Hill which makes

> > getting in early difficult.

>

> Eileen, you are amazing!!! There is now a Dartford

> train at 7.52am and 8.19am from Denmark Hill. How

> did you do it?



God knows...

  • 2 months later...

Boris Johnson is deciding this month whether to axe the South London Line. The link below lets you send him a letter to ask him to reconsider and only takes about 1 minute to do. If it is something you care about I think it would be 1 minute well spent.


http://www.facebook.com/l/f1266;www.southlondonpress.co.uk/tn/mayorletter.cfm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...