Jump to content

.


macutd

Recommended Posts

FGS people, the OP clearly states it's a novelty item. Whilst I understand the sentiment behind your distaste some of your comments are harsh, verging on malign


e.g. "can't support child abusers" - who on earth is asking you to do any such thing? Why would you even suggest that the OP is asking that? Think of what that comment is implying about macutd - something very offensive indeed to someone who is simply offering for sale an old fashioned item that you find distasteful.


"we should be charging you to take this item" - What? Why? What ever does that even mean?


I get that some posters don't feel the OP should have put this up for sale, and of course agree that JS was an evil person, but don't make this into some kind of forum witch-hunt on the innocent OP. The worst you can accuse macutd of is bad judgement here - and I note he's removed the item, so is clearly responsive to public opinion. In this age of rapidly fluctuations in public opinion regarding what constitutes good/bad taste or black humour you can't blame someone for testing the water, and you certainly should be kinder/ more careful with your comments.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/88941--/#findComment-944845
Share on other sites

Hello to all reading this and particularly mactutd. I was surprised at the item on sale when I saw it!! Somebody feels there was a testing of the water!!! I doubt that was the case. Clearly I believe the item was put up in complete innocence, rather than a premeditated cause to upset others, just as I wasn't trying to witch hunt. Guilty party fortunately dead already and the main point he can't hurt anyone again.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/88941--/#findComment-945179
Share on other sites

I really think you guy are taking this out of contents/contexts... the above responses seems like a light hearten joke. For "Sillywomen" to type such a deep response so early in the morning, it seems like a close friend/family to mactutd (noted, Sillywomen mention "he" or didn't "SW" didn't have a goodnight sleep. In my days we were told that "sticks and stones will hurt my bones but words will never heart me" its a tough world out there, we can't be so sensitively. I have seen various cockey comments like this but sillywomen took it so personally in fact more then macutd, I thought this would end up in court...(Sillywomen is this a joke, before you hit the roof again). Macutd from my point of view it was aimed at the Jim and not you, and if you were my friend/family, I would have told you the same thing (dump sillywomen for me...lool). I totally agree with olivia "complete innocence" and not testing the waters. Let all have a drink and a group hug.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/88941--/#findComment-945188
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Tommy has been servicing our boiler for a number of years now and has also carried out repairs for us.  His service is brilliant; he’s reliable, really knowledgeable and a lovely guy.  Very highly recommended!
    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...