Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Reusing graves is a new(ish) idea. Re-using Graves? A ceremony could be anything. It doesn't have to be a fixed concept of grave. The money could go to schools and clubs and benches and endless things and have the name of someone you want remembered.


Right now there is a phased roll out of Grave Destruction: Thousands of remains to be dug up at the Camberwell Cemeteries


www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/grave-cemeteries-destruction


The Camberwell Cemeteries are full. But instead of closing them with respect for the dead buried there, Southwark Council wants to excavate thousands of graves and fell over 10 acres of woodland to sell as new burial plots.


Do you have family buried in Camberwell Old Cemetery?

Is your family name on this list?


Allison Bryant White Bradshaw Macdonald Stone Butler Roe Bird Scott Greig Baker Haynes Snell Webb Perry Harris Taylor Poncett Hall Collins Hossack Minahan


These are the first graves to be excavated, to create an access road for JCBs and diggers to clear the first area of 2.5 acres of woodland at Camberwell Old Cemetery.


If your name is on this list and have family buried there, you have until 15th March 2016 to notify the Council and object.

Contact Cemeteries Manager Avril Kirby: [email protected]

Contact Diocese of Southwark Registrar Paul Morris: [email protected]

Contact Richard Hastings, Clerk to the Registry: [email protected]

Please also contact Save Southwark Woods to let us know if you have friends or relatives buried in the Camberwell Cemeteries: [email protected]


The Church of England can stop the desecration


The Diocese of Southwark has the power to reject Southwark Council?s plans as it is consecrated ground. To date, more than 700 individual objections have been received by the Diocese.


The Diocese of Southwark itself recently erected the Monument to the Unknown Southwark Parishioner, not at the Camberwell Cemeteries but at the new 40 acre Kemnal Park Cemetery under 5 miles away, where other Boroughs such as Tower Hamlets are investing in long-term burial land for all faiths.


Southwark Council?s burial plans not only destroy history and nature, but also exclude any burial provision for Orthodox Muslim residents ? around 44% of Southwark?s burial demand, who have to pay privately for burial outside the borough.


?Southwark Council?s plans would turn the Camberwell Cemeteries into NCP Car Parks of burial,? said Save Southwark Woods spokesperson Blanche Cameron, ?replacing wild woods and nature with sterile burial areas as seen at the Woodvale and Honor Oak Rec extensions.?


Save Southwark Woods is campaigning to preserve the graves, social history, nature and beauty of these inner city Cemeteries - and protect and rewild them as 100 acres of Nature Reserves like Nunhead Cemetery.


Please contact us if you are concerned about Southwark?s plans: [email protected]


Public notice in Southwark News

http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/public-notices/legal-camberwell-old-cemetery/


Image is graves at Camberwell New Cemetery



[email protected]

www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk

@southwarkwoods

Facebook Page Save Southwark Woods

Watch the aerial video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b76wj7BO8yI

Sign the petition to save Southwark Woods https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-southwark-woods

The full notice, to prevent any mis-representation


LEGAL ? CAMBERWELL OLD CEMETERY

NEWS DESK (07 October, 2015)

Notice of Extinguishing Exclusive Rights of Burial under the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1975 CAMBERWELL OLD CEMETERY

Under the GLC (General Powers) Act 1975 the London Borough of Southwark has been granted powers to extinguish the rights of burial in any grave which contains sufficient space for not less than one further interment, where such a right has not been exercised for 75 years from the date of the latest interment in the grave or, if there have been no interments from the date of the grant of the right of interment.

In order to comply with the Act the London Borough of Southwark hereby gives notice that it intends to extinguish the interment rights in respect of the following graves and to remove any tombstones which are present on those graves in accordance with s. 21 of the Act:

Square 89 Square 106

Grave No 11272 Family name ? Allison Grave No 28016 Family name ? Haynes

Grave No 13363 Family name ? Bryant Grave No 28055 Family name ? Snell

Grave No 14379 Family name ? White Grave No 28075 Family name ? Webb

Grave No 15772 Family name ? Bradshaw Square 107

Grave No 14934 Family name ? Macdonald Grave No 28274 Family name ? Perry

Grave No 10512 Family name ? Stone Grave No 28285 Family name ? Harris

Grave No 10524 Family name ? Butler Grave No 28290 Family name ? Taylor

Grave No 15786 Family name ? Roe Grave No 28804 Family name ? Poncett

Grave No 16828 Family name ? Bird Grave No 29408 Family name ? Hall

Grave No 16836 Family name ? Scott Grave No 29941 Family name ? Collins

Grave No 16807 Family name ? Greig Grave No 30326 Family name ? Hossack

Square 106 Square 108

Grave No 27893 Family name ? Baker Grave No 30293 Family name ? Minahan

The Council has also served notice upon registered owners of the rights of interment and on the registered owners of any tombstone affected at their registered addresses for these graves

The Council does not intend to extinguish the rights on these graves or remove the tombstones until 15 March 2016. After this date all existing rights will be deemed to be extinguished unless we have been notified of an objection to the extinguishment of the right or to the removal of the tombstone in writing by the registered owner of the grave or a next of kin with a legal claim to the exclusive right of burial in the grave.

Any tombstone(s) removed will remain the property of the owner and available for a further 3 months after 15 March 2016 Compensation is payable in accordance with subsection 21 (7) to any legitimate owner in respect of, and proportionate to the loss of rights of the plots affected provided that a claim is made within 6 months from 15 March 2016 If you are the current owner of one of the above graves or believe know the whereabouts of these families, please contact the Cemeteries and Crematorium Office, Brenchley Gardens, SE23 3RD.

Telephone No 020 7525 5600 Email [email protected]

"Reusing graves is a new(ish) idea."


Again, I'm finding these campaigners' idea of time bizarre. Trees that are 20 years old become "ancient woodland", a practice that was occurring in at least the 19th century in London is described as "new(ish)"

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Reusing graves is a new(ish) idea."

>

> Again, I'm finding these campaigners' idea of time

> bizarre. Trees that are 20 years old become

> "ancient woodland", a practice that was occurring

> in at least the 19th century in London is

> described as "new(ish)"



I'm guessing they keep starting new threads because they don't want people to see all the posts on the old threads which highlight their attempts to distort facts.


JohnL, that's an excellent idea.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nxjen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "Reusing graves is a new(ish) idea."

> >

> > Again, I'm finding these campaigners' idea of

> time

> > bizarre. Trees that are 20 years old become

> > "ancient woodland", a practice that was

> occurring

> > in at least the 19th century in London is

> > described as "new(ish)"

>

>

> I'm guessing they keep starting new threads

> because they don't want people to see all the

> posts on the old threads which highlight their

> attempts to distort facts.

>

> JohnL, that's an excellent idea.


Yeah, they're really just making it up as they go along

Why this is important:


People who have a family member buried in the Cemeteries may want to know that the council is going to be digging up their loved one's grave - a plot they bought for eternity.


If Vodafone sold you a plan with "unlimited internet forever" and much later told you they would be stopping that, you would scream bloody murder. That is what the Council is doing here with the graves of your loved ones.


And everyone who wants to get buried there may want to know that they won't be resting in peace forever. Their body will be dug up in 75 years and the plot sold off to someone else.


And everyone who thinks of a cemetery as having old, lovely headstones may be surprised to find that in a few years there won't be any old headstones left, just regimented rows of new graves. These new graves waiting to be dug up in 75 years.


Lewis Schaffer

Local Resident

tomskip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Honestly? If the grave houses the remains of

> someone who could not possibly be remembered by

> anyone now living (so, say, they died more than

> 100 years ago) then what is the harm?



No! According to edborders/Lewis Schaffer above, these are "your loved ones".


You love them even if you never knew them, I guess.


And "they" are not currently "resting in peace" in their graves, edborders. "They" are hopefully resting in peace in the hereafter, but presumably that is their souls or whatever you believe in, or don't.


I don't think a body rotting away in a grave can be considered "resting in peace", myself. There will probably not be much of it left to dig up, let alone for its restful peace to be disturbed.

The point is for you to think about it which is what the people who "click" on the post are doing.


If I were to put someone in a grave and have RIP chiseled on a stone I'd expect it meant RIP and In Perpetuity whether I was still around or not. What's the point otherwise.


And the reason I personally care is that Cemeteries are the last urban green spaces we will ever see or our children or grandchildren etc and they, for me, are the last chance to bring wild green to where we live.


And I care for a long list of reasons including climate change.


Imagine taking the ?9000 spent on a grave and giving it to something the person liked clubs and culture and hospitals or a bench or a tree with their name. The council is planning to cut youth services and loads of other things. Some of the young people in some of the graves are there because of "circumstance". So the council defends the right of people to go in and out of graves like a long stay parking lot but wants to cut money that addresses the reasons some young people end up in an early grave.


For me that's a problem. There's loads of in perpetuity graves 5 miles away and the cost would be negligible.

Reusing grave space is very old practice indeed. In fact, I think this is what I would rather Southwark Council did than digging up mature trees! I would be in favour of an ossuary - it seems bizarre to me that anyone would expect to be interred for perpetuity in an inner city area.

mynamehere Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the reason I personally care is that

> Cemeteries are the last urban green spaces we will

> ever see or our children or grandchildren etc and

> they, for me, are the last chance to bring wild

> green to where we live.


You should take a stroll around Green Dale, an oasis of wild greenery enjoyed by both people and wildlife ? and long may it stay that way:

http://www.friendsofgreendale.org.uk/

dbboy thank you for doing that post; that took a lot of time.

I think it has proven that the council can only do so much to find owners of various plots.

If you own a plot in a cemetery do you think to inform the relevant local authority when you move?

Are you sure anyone in your family would tell you before they die that they own a plot in a cemetery?


We have to take responsibility here.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy thank you for doing that post; that took a

> lot of time.



Great that he found it and posted it, but I imagine since it's the full text of a council notice that it was copied and pasted in one fell swoop aka a couple of clicks?

Yes, I did copy and paste, however I did this as I am sick to the back teeth of the threads these imbecile tree huggers create about an over grown piece of scrub land that is actually burial space that the Council want to now use and which I totally support them to in doing so.


Not only do they purport to be anti-burial but also believe that graves in rows are wrong. This is how cemetery's are now laid out so it is easier to maintain the grass, and if you look at the new graves that have headstones put in place they look quite tidy. Just visit and take a look at some of the older cemetery's like Hither Green where the grass at times around the older graves are so over grown it is a disgrace.


If the Council Notice is read in full you will see what the Council are proposing to do, further more I have no problem with graves being re-used. Perhaps if this practice was used in Nunhead cemetery none of the problems of limited grave space would exist in Southwark. These scrub land tree hugger's twist facts for there own benefit and use emotive language in doing so.


As I have said previously if the tree hugging scrub land lovers want to enjoy wooded areas than we are more than spoilt for choice, lets start AGAIN with Sydenham Hill Woods that you can see from the Underhill Road/Langton Rise junction, Coxes Walk, One Tree Hill, Horniman nature trail, Horniman Gardens and Park, Peckham Rye Common and Parks and least I forget Brenchley Gardens and just almost a stone throw away is Crystal Palace Park behind Crystal Palace Parade. If you want more have a read of the very recent thread on countryside walks in Kent around Shoreham, (I always thought Shoreham was in Sussex).


Maybe the tree hugging scrub land lovers want to be cremated, that's fine be me, but just remember how much energy cremation uses, it's not very green friendly to do so, but I don't have any problems with that either. So for the umpteenth time can I suggest this thread is duly buried.

edborders Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> People who have a family member buried in the

> Cemeteries may want to know that the council is

> going to be digging up their loved one's grave - a

> plot they bought for eternity.


The English graveyards I know sell limited period leases.


I own a 75 year lease on my parents' grave.


Do they sell "freehold plots" in hometown USA?


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...