Jump to content

Consultation on Bellenden Road - Holly Grove - Lyndhurst Way Cycling and Walking Improvements


Recommended Posts

Why when they redesigned this junction not so long ago this was not thought of.


I don't think Southwark has a clue. Univ grads with no local experience only paper theory. Would not be surprised to learn they are employed on how cheap they are or have managed to answer the pc employment questions correctly.

I've seen a lot of near accidents and near misses on the one way system at the bottom of Warwick Gardens, particularly at the junction between Lyndhurst Way and Holly Grove. People don't seem to understand the right of way system there and a lot of drivers really hammer it heading onto Bellenden Road. I don't think it's particularly bad for cyclists because of the one way. More of an issue for pedestrians and the general amenity of the area; which is essentially residential, but is blighted by the one way system.


Biggest issue for cyclists round there is the quality of road service on Lyndhurst Way, which is dreadful.


And the really big issue is that the whole of the Bellenden area is used as a rat run and cut-through. anything to address that would really make a big difference

You do occasionally get drivers coming out of Chadwick Road, cutting across cyclist travelling down Bellenden (usually idiots doing it quite intentionally). Agree that the surface on Lyndhurst is terrible and as said it's difficult to cross from and to Kelly Ave. to join the quietway. Otherwise, it seems OK cycling around Bellenden.

www.crashmaps.co.uk shows a number of reported crashes around the area of proposed changes.


I'm a pretty confident cyclist and don't personally have trouble cycling this route - except the occasional driver not giving me sufficient space to be safe. But it's actually about encouraging non cyclists to cycle as well as making the area easier to walk and residents having a more pleasant area. And the changes shouldn't make through journeys a bit quick not being diverted around a one-way system. This assumes they're not already speeding.

How will it make the area easier to walk? will people not use pavements any more and how will removing a small one way system and replacing it with two way traffic make it a more pleasant area?


How will it encourage non cyclists to cycle they still have to ride on busy inner london roads.


You state that there has been number of reported crashes around the area of proposed changes.


Would you please list them and what types of accidents they are if its not too much trouble

@rahrahrah the Peckham Road crossing is on traffic lights at least. Seems reasonably safe for cyclists, northbound you need to position yourself in front of traffic in the Lyndhurst Way queue (to avoid possible left/right hooks), southbound you have to keep an eye out for right turning traffic out of Lyndhurst, but overall it's not too bad.


  Quote

I dare anyone car or cyclist to try and speed on Lyndhurst Way with all the speed bumps and parked traffic as to blockages on Bellenden Road outside the shops this is more to do with selfishness than anything.



By speed do you mean exceed the posted 20mph limit, or the 30 one that some on this forum wish was still in force? Piece of cake getting to 25 along there, car or bike. 35? Maybe not.


@ed_pete The problem with cycle training / ride leading / confidence building *on its own* (don't get me wrong.. think it's a great idea & all cyclists or would-be-cyclists should do it) is that it excludes the young from actually getting from A to B by bike. You can't train an 8-year-old to cycle independently in busy traffic conditions any more than you can train a pig to sing opera. They lack the basic physical and mental attributes required - most importantly, predictable behaviour themselves, good judgement in the face of the unexpected, and the ability to intuitively see things from other road users' point of view. Even older kids & young adults display some pretty questionable judgement on the roads all too often, as anyone who's ever tried to get under-21's car insurance knows all too well.


So while I don't believe in cycle paths everywhere - and I haven't seen anyone credible suggesting that - the kind of traffic volume reduction on minor streets which this scheme proposes does create conditions more suitable for some younger riders. I'm very much in favour of cyclists sharing the road with other traffic, but only in situations where the other traffic has been reduced/calmed to a point where few are excluded from cycling if they want to. The existing layout is fine if you keep your wits about you, but it does have a certain element of "surprise" (for pedestrians, cyclists & drivers alike) and the inexperienced aren't likely to cope well with that.


If you think cycling in London should be limited to the kind of people who are fit to hold a driving license, sure, leave it as is, it hasn't killed anyone AFAIK, but I personally think we should aspire to something a bit better than that.

Looking at the crash map it seems that two areas of concern are Chadwick Road (where it crosses Bellenden) and peckham road at the crossing from Lyndhurst Road to and from Kelly avenue. I'm not shocked.

The former, I can't see anyone being able to do much about. In my experience a lot of vehicles will see bikes and dash out in front of them regardless, because they don't want to be held up, or simply for sport. This is about education more than road layout in my opinion. There are a number of drivers who will go out of their way to cut up cyclists and this is a classic spot for the belligerent Top Gear watching van driver.

The second 'hotspot' could do with some attention - the crossing between Lyndhurst and Kelly Avenue. I believe it's outside the scope of this consultation though.

So I looked on crashmap.co.uk and found that from 2011 it indicates 1 serious incident (Lyndhurst grovej/w lyndhurst way and 6 minor incidents in the broad area covered by the consultation. Whilst any incident is unwelcome (and without creating a crashmap login which I can't be bothered with right now I can't see the reports)these could just be car to car and have nothing to do with pedestrians and cyclists.

Having lived in the area for a long while now and as a pedestrian and driver (I don't cycle, I feel that what is really needed is some more pedestrian crossings to cross Chadwick maybe further up towards the j/w Lyndhurst Way and a way to better manage the roadcrossing from Chadwick rd east over Bellenden rd to chadwick Rd west. I have witnessed a bad accident here, but it was caused by both drivers not following the highway code - ie pulling out without due attention and driving too fast so unable to stop in time. Changing the road system won't change bad road use or pedestrian behaviours! The rest of the system works fine.

Unfortunately we local residents will not have a say in this as local knowledge will be brushed aside in favour of new residents fear of moving traffic.


All that is needed is for the junctions to be looked at particularly the Bellenden cross over with both Chadwick Roads as three roads converge.


If you are stuck in lower Chadwick Road you will put your foot down to get across. As mentioned earlier patience and common sense seems to be lacking in this new generation. Never had these problems before.

Charles Notice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unfortunately we local residents will not have a

> say in this as local knowledge will be brushed

> aside in favour of new residents fear of moving

> traffic.

>

Why do people make statements like this ? What evidence do you have ? There is an open consultation - anyone can reply.

Why? I only found out about this consultation by chance. I am not enrolled with Peckham vision etc. I did ask Southwark to keep me informed but they never did about future consultations after the last fiasco.


Experience has shown that if you are not in the loop you have no chance of commenting. Local and I want change mob will always push their own views and if it meets Southwarks requirements they will use that push it through.


Having been involved with Authorities I know the most vocal and pushy minority will always push it through if it meets the ruling parties requirements.


I suspect the vast majority of local residents know zip about this consultation.


Even though this effects the local area no local Cllrs has put their head above the parapet to comment Nothing strange in that they are Labour.


It will be interesting to see the figures relating to people voted.


Was you contacted about this?

"Re: Closure of Melbourne Grove to through traffic - new petitionjectio

Posted by ed_pete 23 December, 2015 20:51"


Usual rhetoric without evidence. However I am glad that Charles has highlighted the consultation on the changes to Bellenden Road / Holly Grove etc for which I will start a separate thread.



And if ed_pete had not kindly put up this thread who would have known about the consultation?

Hi CN,

The one-way system when I've walked through the area appeared to me to encourage speeding making it harder to cross the road especially with children. Sorry I assumed this was obvious to anyone walking in the area.


I used to live on a one-way gyratory road. We also had it ended and made a huge improvement to the area while reducing the number of vehicles sent on a detour through the one-way system. After talking to a Labour councillor about it he told me the only person who was going to fix the problem was me - cack handed inspired me to get involved in local politics. Seems pretty obvious win win to me for all residents and people travelling through the area.

"The one-way system when I've walked through the area appeared to me to encourage speeding making it harder to cross the road especially with children. Sorry I assumed this was obvious to anyone walking in the area."


As I live in the area of the one way system I would have thought as a resident I would have a better idea of the system than you who only walks through the area and who has well known fixed views on certain subjects.


What appears to you to be correct is not always the case. Melbourne Grove springs to mind and your view.


Please when commenting please do not do so under Liberal Democrat Councillor for East Dulwich Ward.


You do not represent Lane Ward so please if you wish to comment do so as an ordinary person. So please drop the above

As someone living in the middle of the gyratory, I see a lot of drivers treat the Lyndhurst/Holly Grove/Bellenden turns as a chicane and taking the blind corners too fast to stop safely. I also see boy racers dangerously overtaking on the wide part of the one-way road between the Holly Grove/Bellenden corner and the Bellenden/Chadwick Rd junction. Accidents - maybe not. A lot of near misses - yes.

Hi CN,

If I were to comment without making it clear I'm a councillor some would accuse me of being less transparent.


You can register on the Southwark Council website to be email when any documents with the key words your log are posted on the council website. If you were to use this service you shouldn't need to randomly check notice boards any more or read the small ads section of local newspapers for public notices. Hope this helps. If you get stuck working out how to do this I'll did out a link for you.

Thank you for your reply however could you respond to the message below which you seem to have missed.



How will it make the area easier to walk? will people not use pavements any more and how will removing a small one way system and replacing it with two way traffic make it a more pleasant area?


How will it encourage non cyclists to cycle they still have to ride on busy inner london roads.


You state that there has been number of reported crashes around the area of proposed changes.


Would you please list them and what types of accidents they are if its not too much trouble


Regards

Cycle through here most days, can't see any real benefit here at all.


When will the council stop messing around with these sort of cosmetic exercises at a time when money is tight?


At least spend the money we do have on something meaningful!

More covered, secure bike parking near people's homes and at public transport destination would get. Lot more pool cycling than tinkering with road layouts. Why can't you park a bike safely at Brixton, our nearest tube for example?

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi CN,

> The one-way system when I've walked through the

> area appeared to me to encourage speeding making

> it harder to cross the road especially with

> children. Sorry I assumed this was obvious to

> anyone walking in the area.

>

> I used to live on a one-way gyratory road. We also

> had it ended and made a huge improvement to the

> area while reducing the number of vehicles sent on

> a detour through the one-way system. After talking

> to a Labour councillor about it he told me the

> only person who was going to fix the problem was

> me - cack handed inspired me to get involved in

> local politics. Seems pretty obvious win win to me

> for all residents and people travelling through

> the area.



Just got it. The Caine Munity. Humphry Bogart.

Strongly support these improvements, to an area which is finally starting to fulfill its potential. There will always be people against any change, and it's impossible to please everyone or come up with the perfect solution for everything.
For those claiming to live in the area affected but not to have known about the consultation: there's a large banner on the railings of Warwick Gardens opposite Holly Grove, which has been there since before Christmas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...