Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I heard the female announcer say '63 to Forest Hill' only once so wasn't sure if I had heard correctly. Tried to see if the bus made the right turn into Wood Vale but am pretty sure it did it's usual U-turn back round to the stop by the cemetary.

I haven't taken my usual commute this week so cannot say whether it has been busier except for today when it went zooming pass The Gardens without stopping (and there was quite a crowd waiting too). This was around 8am.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8727-63-bus/#findComment-265929
Share on other sites

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I came back earlier in teh week and it

> announced"Forest Hill" as the destination, but it

> still terminates at Forest Hill Tavern on Forest

> Hill Road and then turns round as usual.


Yep, I can confirm this is the case now and it also still says Honor Oak on the front of the bus. I noticed other people who got off also checked the front of the bus as they walked by too.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8727-63-bus/#findComment-266442
Share on other sites

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I came back earlier in teh week and it

> announced"Forest Hill" as the destination, but it

> still terminates at Forest Hill Tavern on Forest

> Hill Road and then turns round as usual.


Yep, I can confirm this is the case now and it also still says Honor Oak on the front of the bus. I noticed other people who got off also checked the front of the bus as they walked by too.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8727-63-bus/#findComment-266642
Share on other sites

During the recent traffic works at that junction I spotted an emptied of it's passengers 63 do a 3 point turn just before the the traffic island opposite the cemetary entrance and rattle immediately back to Peckham. I was both impressed by the skillfully executed manoevre and the sheer audacity of it. I could almost feel the driver of the 63 drawing up behind do a double take.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8727-63-bus/#findComment-266455
Share on other sites

During the recent traffic works at that junction I spotted an emptied of it's passengers 63 do a 3 point turn just before the the traffic island opposite the cemetary entrance and rattle immediately back to Peckham. I was both impressed by the skillfully executed manoevre and the sheer audacity of it. I could almost feel the driver of the 63 drawing up behind do a double take.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8727-63-bus/#findComment-266655
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...