Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My only comfort is that its not

> enough support to actually win in the US.



Just hope there isn't a significant attack on U.S. soil (I mean something on Paris scale) as that could sway people towards him if they're suitably scared.

I saw the years of the links I put up and so what? Stuff just gets pushed out of sight- doesn't mean it's gone away. The fact that it was there in the first place is very disturbing.

I don't think anyone can be accused of xenophobia - phobia is a very strong word, the type of rhetoric used by the left to gag the masses, like the word 'racist', designed to make people who are suspicious, or careful, think there is something wrong with them...well I for one am extremely suspicious of an 'organisation', 'cult' or whatever , that has set up what is effectively a parallel society and made it abundantly clear that they think the way of life of the 'infidel' is inferior (and has been unashamedly courted by politicians of almost all persuasions).

Even some members the Muslim Council of GB, when asked for its opinion of the Charlie Hebdo murders, said they deplored the murders, but added the proviso that Charlie Hebdo shouldn't take the piss out of the prophet, or words to that effect.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Okay, because you think the police don't care

> about crime in poor areas (again, your assumption)

> from there you extrapolate that the areas have

> become so radicalized that the police won't go

> there?

>

> Is that the argument? Where in London are these

> terrorist radicalized areas that are no go areas

> for the police?

>


I do remember this video doing the rounds (immigration officers

in Rye Lane) provoking the notion Rye Lane is no go for some reason

(look at the comments).




The Rye Lane I know is nothing like that of course - If I dropped

a cigarette there I'd be pulled :).

uncleglen Wrote:

----------------------------------------------------


> Even some members the Muslim Council of GB, when

> asked for its opinion of the Charlie Hebdo

> murders, said they deplored the murders, but added

> the proviso that Charlie Hebdo shouldn't take the

> piss out of the prophet, or words to that effect.



I haven't read all this thread, I'm just idly browsing before bed. so I'm sorry to jump in.


I obviously don't condone the Charlie Hebdo murders, but in my opinion the cartoonists were poking a bear with a stick.


The nature of how Muslims/Mohammed were portrayed in the cartoons was compared by many to the portrayal of Jews in cartoons in Germany before and during the war.


If that comment isn't relevant then please ignore, I don't want to send the thread off course.

Charlie Hebdo has poked fun at Judaism and Christianity as well- the Pope has particularly been hard hit and France is a catholic country -in fact ever since I can remember there have been jokes poking fun at religion...primarily because it is a load of twaddle designed to control people and deserves to be ridiculed at every opportunity...

I'm not surprised that a quarter of Brits (in fact I'm surprised it isn't more people)agree with Trump's views on this. And exactly who compared the cartoons to Jews in cartoons before the war?...the caricatures of everyone are well known- everyone is lampooned and it is funny...comparing Islam to the Spanish Inquisition would not be far from the truth.

I don't think there is anything wrong with Muslim leaders condemning the violence of the Charlie Hebdo murders while saying that the cartoons were offensive.


You can think something is wrong (and people often do) without condoning violence. In fact, unless I missed something, I don't think they were suggesting that it should be illegal to make fun of the profit, but just that they think its wrong and offensive. People say they are offended by things other people do all the time so I'm not really sure what your point on that is.

I don't think they find cartoons only 'offensive'.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/016-insulters-islam.htm

And in Poland you can be jailed under article 196 of their Penal Code for public calumny of religious objects.

Humanity will never move on and get out of the mire of state sanctioned persecution of atheism at this rate

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think they find cartoons only 'offensive'.

>

> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/016-insult

> ers-islam.htm

> And in Poland you can be jailed under article 196

> of their Penal Code for public calumny of

> religious objects.

> Humanity will never move on and get out of the

> mire of state sanctioned persecution of atheism at

> this rate


Try the Bible for size. This is what it says about women:


http://www.nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/darkbible7.htm

Has anyone else seen this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c2DgwPG7mAA


I can't begin to unpack it. The layers of self-reference and narcissism are obviously plastered on extremely thickly. But I can't see what Trump thinks would be funny about it.


Just, can't, compute.

And what makes you think that must Muslims in Britain do? That wasn't the position taken by those you were accusing of defending the Charlie H murders.



uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes but most right minded people today in the UK

> do not live by that shyte or legislate to enforce

> it

When talking about the very specific issue of beating children, or indeed FGM, yes you can expect people to behave in a way that the law in the country they live in would expect.



That's pretty different from expecting people to just leave their culture behind and fit in with "our" ways.



As well I am sure you realise.



Unless you're a complete idiot.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> or indeed FGM, yes you can

> expect people to behave in a way that the law in

> the country they live in would expect


Where are the convictions?

>

>

> That's pretty different from expecting people to

> just leave their culture behind and fit in with

> "our" ways.

>

Er, its related to Sharia law discussion above, and denial these things take place.


Unless youre a complete idiot.

Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > or indeed FGM, yes you can

> > expect people to behave in a way that the law

> in

> > the country they live in would expect

>

> Where are the convictions?

> >

> >

> > That's pretty different from expecting people

> to

> > just leave their culture behind and fit in with

> > "our" ways.

> >

> Er, its related to Sharia law discussion above,

> and denial these things take place.

>

> Unless youre a complete idiot.


Which you clearly are.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Grok Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > or indeed FGM, yes you can

> > > expect people to behave in a way that the law

> > in

> > > the country they live in would expect

> >

> > Where are the convictions?

> > >

> > >

> > > That's pretty different from expecting people

> > to

> > > just leave their culture behind and fit in

> with

> > > "our" ways.

> > >

> > Er, its related to Sharia law discussion above,

> > and denial these things take place.

> >

> > Unless youre a complete idiot.

>

> Which you clearly are. *hic*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...