Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just as the title says really. I have heard bad things in the past about this potentially useful walking/cycling route up to King's from ED, but now the nights are drawing in, what do forum-ites who currently use it, think?

Was planning on cycling to Kings for a series of treatments early evening.

I'd say watch out after dark.


Just before Christmas last year I was on my way to pick up my son from nursery on Greendale and some idiot attempted to mug me with a lock knife. Cut a long story very short, I'm pretty well able to look after myself and it was a bad night's work for him.


If I had been a woman on my own I'd probably have been quite shaken up.

Both me and LadyMac are very much of the "carry yourself well and you'll be fine" persuasion. We have lived in London for many a year without a hiccup. She walks home on her own every night etc etc


But neither of us will use GreenDale or the alley connecting to Sainsbos at night

Yep. About 50 or so yards from the entrance to Mother Goose nursery, going down the hill, not quite as far as the small alley that leads through to the primary school and a little further still from the alley that connects to Sainsburys.


I think that the darkness is the issue here. If it was better lit then I think the opportunity for attack would be much more limited. Given that this is a common route used by parents coming and going to the nursery, maybe someone might know how we could raise this as a concern to a local council person.


I think it pays to have some smarts in places like this. I clocked this guy from quite a distance and knew almost instantly he was up to no good. When he passed by me on the path he was obviously weighing things up. As soon as I heard him stop behind me I knew things were only going to go one way. Because I was already expecting the worst I was counting his steps behind me to estimate how far away he was and how much time I had to prepare for him.


However, as I said, I'm quite comfortable (in relative terms) in these sort of situations. Many would not be. Especially not mums with kids. I also see a pensioner picking up her grandkids from the nursery. I would not like to think that she would fall victim to this sort of thing.


As you can see from the above detail, the guy was clearly an idiot. His attempt to mug me was right out of amateur hour, but he would be scary to many people nevertheless.

No, I used to post on various other places of that sort, but it gets like groundhog day on there.


I know a good many of the lads who are intelligent, erudite, respectful and generally good blokes and usually, like me, fathers. However, that is not to say that for every one like that there are not at least two other complete sociopaths.


I prefer more genteel company these days. Still friends with a lot of the boys though.

What thread is that?


Soulboys in aesthetic terms were the prototype that I would say first generation casuals followed/looked to. I was always a bit disappointed that I was too young, but made up for it by embracing two other youth cultures during the 80's/90's - hence the moniker.


Anyhooooooo!


Greendale. No good after dark. Take care...

Acid Casual Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd say watch out after dark.

>

> Just before Christmas last year I was on my way to

> pick up my son from nursery on Greendale and some

> idiot attempted to mug me with a lock knife. Cut a

> long story very short, I'm pretty well able to

> look after myself and it was a bad night's work

> for him.

>

> If I had been a woman on my own I'd probably have

> been quite shaken up.



Nice one mate. Im glad you were able to stand up to this thug and sort him out!!



I know Greendale well and my daughter went to Mother Goose. I have to say walking back in the dark with her..hasnt really bothered me..though this was around 6pm


I wouldnt walk down there after that time.

A lot of people also use the Greendale to get to and from Bessemer Grange School from the East Dulwich end.


I remember a few years ago a grandmother taking her grandchild to the school was attacked and mugged in daylight.


I've used it but the thing is once you start walking through there's literally nowhere to escape on either side if anybody did try anything.


Also, a lot of people let their dogs run free and seeing a big dog coming towards you can be scary (if you're not used to them).

Spot on.


Which is why I was forced to fight back. The grandmother you talk about must have been terrified. How's she meant to cope with an attack like that? Equally her grandkids must have been traumatised by it.


Given that there is a Nursery school on Greendale and therefore using an alternative route is impossible to a lot of people, would anyone know how to raise this as an issue to be addressed with better street lighting PCSOs or other? Before anyone starts, I know that PCSOs are not exactly Starsky and Hutch, but they are potential witnesses. Most muggers will not attack if they think they are in danger of being identified I wouldn't think.


When I eventually contacted the old bill they were actually quite good. They had said they had increased plainclothes patrols in the area, and were pretty decent about the situation with me.


I also got a follow up call from them between Christmas and New Year to see if I was alright(!?!?!??!) which led to quite a funny conversation about the circumstances, and the guy saying that by listening to the account of the officers involved and the recording of my 999 call, that "It might be the first time that we'd think about offering a mugger victim support instead of the victim themselves" which I found quite funny.

I have just descoverd this path during the summer and think it is brilliant, however I now do not cycle home using it after dark for a couple of reasons... well really only one and that is that it is too dark, it is really badly lit in the evenings and so it actually really tricky on a bike (there are lots of potholes & wet leaves / speed bumps(!))

Then there is also the safty issue and I really do think if it was better lit it would be loads safer, especially as it would encourage more people to use it... so what do we do to get it better lit??

I walk my dog down there a couple of times a day - yes, off the lead - and it is fairly well used. It's not often I walk down and there's no one else around either on foot or bike, so I don't feel too worried during the day. I wouldn't do it in the dark though.
I don't think it's safe in the day. A few months ago I was walking that way with my baby in the pram. I was up the very top (not sure if it's technically still Greendale once you're virtually at the top of the hill?) and some weirdo started following me. I broke into a run, and then a sprint and he ran after me. I was terrified. He was a big guy and weird looking but even if he'd been a weed I'd still have been very frightened in case something happened to my baby. The whole incident was like something out of a horror film. The front wheel of the pram hit a big pothole, buckled and came off. He was closing in on me when I saw a BT engineer. I shouted for help and he came over. The weird man turned and fled. I was very shaken up and now don't go that way at all.
How sad this all is. I grew up on the Bessemer estate and went to Bessemer Grange school in the fifties. My friends and I spent many a day and night playing on our bikes in Greendale without any incidents apart from grazed knees ! Before the pub was built there was an orchard where we climbed trees and played for hours only going home when our tea was ready.We didnt have mobile phones and our parents knew where we were and we we would know when it was time to go home..When I moved to Dulwich in the 80's I used to walk with my baby up to my Parents house thru Greendale again also sometimes in the dark and never felt worried .How times have changed.

Yes, it is sad isn't it?


I know that the passage of time blurs our recollection, and that many of the less great things about the past are edited out in our memories. Not in any way wanting to cause offence, but the time which you speak of probably did have its downside too, but I'd wager you're pretty much on the money that Greendale was a lot nicer and safer back then.


Me and my mates recall the eighties with the same sort of fondness. I did have a brilliant time. I grew up in what was then quite a tough area in one of Britain's major cities but what I thought was quite a good place to grow up in. It happens now to be far worse, but we loved it.


Then we remembered binman's strikes, power cuts, open gang warfare, massive and widespread unemployment, heroin abuse, etc, etc. We all looked at each other and thought "God, it was awful back then!"


Fact was, in the middle of all of this we had pretty much a common and very fun childhood.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Anyone know what’s happened on the Lordship Lane Estate? Lots of police, ambulances, areas cornered off, police tape everywhere. Lordship Lane side of the Estate near Melford Road.
    • This is my take of the scheme and planning committee report: Railway Yard Scheme 402 objectors and 22 supporters. Huge local concern about this proposal. The scheme is out of character and contrary to The Southwark Plan and Suburban zoning for the site. The adjacent schemes 18-22 Grove Vale is ground and three stories, The Charter School North Dulwich is 3-4, the Tessa Jowel Health Centre is ground and two stories.  This proposed scheme is significantly higher and bulkier. And the corrugated iron looking top floors will be visible for some distance from the site. All the views in the report demonstrate how out of keeping with the Suburban zone this scheme in. What is the point of having such policies if they are ignored? Council officers and members have agreed the site must be redeveloped with an indicative capacity of 53 new homes. The proposal is 3 to 4 times bigger than that with 53 homes and 360 student rooms and additional shared spaces. (2.5 student rooms equating to 1 home). The officer report incorrectly talks about buses going to Brixton, which makes me concerned about the PTAL calculation which partly I would imagine officers have based their acceptance of this over development.  PTAL 4 for the site. TfL PTAL calculator. The social housing will likely be 3.  The assumptions are crow flies. If it is time to access public transport then much of the remainder of the site becomes PTAL3 and the rationale for the officers recommends would be incorrect.  Student accommodation demand comments appear to date from three years ago. Since then various research showing significantly reduced numbers which have not been included in the report. BBC 5 March states 14% drop in foreign students. The House of Commons library 25 March states most foreign students are now postgrads therefore questionable if this accommodation would meet their needs.  ONS reporting that the number of children who will become students has been consistently falling. That Southwark itself is in the process of closing up to 17 primary schools! This will feed through to reduced undergraduate numbers.  The report suggests circa £10,000 is spent by each student in the area. I would suggest vast majority is on accommodation and not circulating in local shops and facilities or indeed Southwark more widely. Additionally they receive free public transport so will not be contributing towards any required improvements.  The report then suggests each student residing at this scheme would be spending around £5,400 in the immediate East Dulwich area each year. This seems extremely unlikely.  The report states members should give some consideration for daylight and sunlight loss with 21 minor, 8 moderate, and 20 substantial adverse reductions. A good scheme would have avoided this.  Any normal school in the Subriban South Zone would have avoided this. Overlooking. Officers state this as minimal. That the reduction in living conditions is acceptable.  That is so easy to type in a report. Many objectors have stated the reduction is not accepted by local residents. Objectively the average person has reached a different conclusion.  Members have the unenviable task of telling ordinary people they are wrong if you approve this scheme.  I would suggest the residents who would suffer this as disagreeing! The blocks will loom over houses nearby. Down to 8.2m gaps on place! If the scheme were to be approved then corridors overlooking 18-22 Grove Vale, Railway Rise scheme proprerties as a minimum should be opaque or angled away. No one wants lots gawping students! I was amazed to see under fire safety a stay put policy would apply. Really? Could a Southwark Planning Committee post Lakanal and GRenfell approve a scheme that relies on that - especially when many students could have English as a second language.  The trip generation stats. From the 53 homes and 360 students stated they would generate 0.76/78 trips per am and pm bus. The am buses are already rammed. And extra 2.4/2.5  people on each peak train.  That would be 33 students and residents across 42 buses serving the 40/176/185 bus routes 7-9am each day. The P13 & 42 would be incredibly inconvenient so can be discounted. Plus only 9 trains 7-9am  going into london so that would be 22 residents and students. So each working day officers have agreed with the developer only 55 people of the 360 students and 53 social homes would be on public transport in the peak times.  This appears quite the fiction. The 53 homes alone are likely to have more than 53 people in employment!  The report talks about limiting student moving in and out times. But the surrounding streets Comtrolled Parking Zone doesn’t cover weekends. Each weekend day we can anticipate an extra 50-100 vehicles needing to park before and after dropping students at this proposed development. This issue has not been covered and is unsolvable to the satisfaction of local residents.  The report even talks about the local tube station which we don’t have! It would be hard to spread this into weekdays as that would risk clashing with the adjacent school start and finish times placing pupils at risk.  This also requires the disabled parking spaces to be relinquished for several weekends each year. How does that work. Part time disabled? Real risk the controlled parking in the area would need to become 24/7 as a number of residents may have cars and they try and park outside the current CPZ operating times.  402 objectors and 22 supporters. This peaks volumes. 
    • If you have lost your Zip card and your first name is Emma or you know Emma please PM me and I will tell you where to find it.
    • My food bin was also not collected…take all our waste and tip it out in the Southwark Council offices…of course then we would have a police raid and be tasered for even thinking of thinking… the mind police are watching us.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...