Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone been following this over the last couple of days? Fantastic stuff


Cameron ditches his "cast-iron" (his words) guarantee on a refurendum, then Pierre Lellouche (French Europe minister) accused the Tories of autism in their thinking on Europe because they just repeat the same line over and over again, and the rest of the EU countries are seriously hacked off with their constant negativity


Wiliam Hague responds to that by saying Lellouch was alone and isolated in his thinking


Now there and then I thought, hang on, whatever one thinks of the Tories position on Europe, surely saying that other EU countries think the Tories are not on board isn't an outrageous stretch of the truth? How deluded would someone have to be to say "no no I think you'll find they all like us"?


Sure enough, EU countries are lining up to day to put Hague straight today. This country is going to be so busted when the Tories get elected... Allied to a declining superpower, estranged from their neighbours and too weak to deal with the upcoming Chinese dominance

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8525-cameron-and-europe/
Share on other sites

They are definitely trying to have it every which way


It's not really their position on Europe that bugs me (although I disagree with it) - it's the way they think that it doesn't matter, that other countries respect their position, that they can insult the EU as much as they like and that one French dude is "on his own" in calling them on it. That we can't cede any power to Brussels when we have been ceding power to America for years and will to to China for many more.


It's just ... weird thinking

Yes, fascinating and I'm glad you started this thread because I'm really confused about this whole EU situation.


I understand we need Europe for both economic and political reasons and can't meet the challenges of the global economy alone.


However, there's still something of the 'little Englander' about me in that I worry about:


- giving up sovereignty to Europe

- allowing EU law to take precedence over British law

- the fact that even our MEPs (mostly unknown names and politcally light-weight) appear to be more powerful than those in Parliament

- a concern that unlike a homogeneous federal US, Europe is still divided along 19th century nation-state and cultural lines hampering agreement and resulting in dubious compromises


Post financial crisis the country doesn't have the luxury of posteuring above its weight and influence but it disturbs me when I see how the EU bullied Ireland into a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.


If the Conservatives do win the next election as expected I'm not sure there's much they can do except follow orders from Brussels - unless they manage to get hold of MEPs expenses claims which would probably cause a Europe-wide out cry and weaken the EU's legitimacy.

Yes, fascinating and I'm glad you started this thread because I'm really confused about this whole EU situation.


I understand we need Europe for both economic and political reasons and can't meet the challenges of the global economy alone.


However, there's still something of the 'little Englander' about me in that I worry about:


- giving up sovereignty to Europe

- allowing EU law to take precedence over British law

- the fact that even our MEPs (mostly unknown names and politcally light-weight) appear to be more powerful than those in Parliament

- a concern that unlike a homogeneous federal US, Europe is still divided along 19th century nation-state and cultural lines hampering agreement and resulting in dubious compromises


Post financial crisis the country doesn't have the luxury of posteuring above its weight and influence but it disturbs me when I see how the EU bullied Ireland into a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.


If the Conservatives do win the next election as expected I'm not sure there's much they can do except follow orders from Brussels - unless they manage to get hold of MEPs expenses claims which would probably cause a Europe-wide out cry and weaken the EU's legitimacy.

Is sovereignty that important to you - and why? Do you not think sovereignty was forfeited after the second world war and the subsequent debt to the US and allegiance to it's policies?


Which EU laws specifically worry you ?


MEPs more powerful than UK MPs? Why it seems like only yesterday that this country would have happily burned all of the UK MPS at the stake. And most EU countries seem to manage just fine within the EU


Speaking of other EU countries - Ireland wasn't bullied into ratifying the treaty. Broken down, Ireland basically used the first referendum to kick the incumbent government on domestic policies. The EU laughed and said "ah now lads that was funny but do you want to do this properly?" and they did


If you think the US states are homogenous I would only be able to think you don't know it very well - just the North/South divide ALONE is still raw, but individual states take their characteristics very very seriously indeed. And if Europe was basically 19th century feudal, the impact of closer ties since the 2 resultant world wards would suggest that, when acting like grown ups and co-operating, much can be done to remedy that

Is sovereignty that important to you - and why? Do you not think sovereignty was forfeited after the second world war and the subsequent debt to the US and allegiance to it's policies?


Which EU laws specifically worry you ?


MEPs more powerful than UK MPs? Why it seems like only yesterday that this country would have happily burned all of the UK MPS at the stake. And most EU countries seem to manage just fine within the EU


Speaking of other EU countries - Ireland wasn't bullied into ratifying the treaty. Broken down, Ireland basically used the first referendum to kick the incumbent government on domestic policies. The EU laughed and said "ah now lads that was funny but do you want to do this properly?" and they did


If you think the US states are homogenous I would only be able to think you don't know it very well - just the North/South divide ALONE is still raw, but individual states take their characteristics very very seriously indeed. And if Europe was basically 19th century feudal, the impact of closer ties since the 2 resultant world wards would suggest that, when acting like grown ups and co-operating, much can be done to remedy that

It's perhaps insularity, immaturity or arrogance agreed but it's a fact and one that makes the whole thing look unworkable in the long term. I think you're also being a bit niave about the rest of europes view which is growing more sceptical. EU politiciamns on the other hand...
It's perhaps insularity, immaturity or arrogance agreed but it's a fact and one that makes the whole thing look unworkable in the long term. I think you're also being a bit niave about the rest of europes view which is growing more sceptical. EU politiciamns on the other hand...

To put it another way, given that other EU countries make this thing work, it makes the citizens of this country look, not disenfranchised, alienated or understandably open to extremism - it just makes them look belligerent and arrogant and a bit mad


What the UK actually does want isn't very clear to me

To put it another way, given that other EU countries make this thing work, it makes the citizens of this country look, not disenfranchised, alienated or understandably open to extremism - it just makes them look belligerent and arrogant and a bit mad


What the UK actually does want isn't very clear to me

Oops cross-post


Is the rest of the EU becoming more sceptical at a citizen level? Not in my experience. I'll go further and say that I know a few sceptics in EU countries who seem to be rather pleased they are in the tent now


as for you saying "perhaps insularity, immaturity or arrogance agreed but it's a fact and one that makes the whole thing look unworkable in the long term"..


I'm not saying those are your views but if they are the views of the UK population for those reasons why can't they be challenged? Those are not a great set of attributes.. most people dealing with an adult with those characteristics would be told by their peers to grow up...

Oops cross-post


Is the rest of the EU becoming more sceptical at a citizen level? Not in my experience. I'll go further and say that I know a few sceptics in EU countries who seem to be rather pleased they are in the tent now


as for you saying "perhaps insularity, immaturity or arrogance agreed but it's a fact and one that makes the whole thing look unworkable in the long term"..


I'm not saying those are your views but if they are the views of the UK population for those reasons why can't they be challenged? Those are not a great set of attributes.. most people dealing with an adult with those characteristics would be told by their peers to grow up...

I think it requires more thought than I've got now but glad you started this, I was thinking of something similarly. I think the fact that no-ones really pushed for it shows rthe depth of suspicion throughout politics in the UK (and I include Labour - GB has sceptic tendancies I believe) and shows what an uphill struggle it will be. God I'm sounding like a stuck record now but I think that the enthusiasm held for europe by a "small, mettropolitam based set of people including many in the media doesn#t" reflect the will overall including many in politics. I meanm that genuinely rtaher than as a value anti-Guradian type rant I just think it shows what a struggle it will be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think to be fair you have to say that Trump misquoted too.  A simple mistake, we all make them.  I am always misquoting the Saudi Crown Prince, and our intelligent services. A bit like the Father Ted sketch of the sarcastic priest in Father Jack's dirty laundry trunk https://fatherted.fandom.com/wiki/Father_Jessup Except Father Ted is fiction, and was a hilarious programme.  
    • Danny Denton and his team have just replaced our rear roof in East Dulwich, they were a pleasure to work with. Danny was communicative throughout the process, knowledgeable, hardworking and competitively priced. I would recommend him without hesitation.  Thanks Danny! LMB
    • I think we have lost all perspective - The BBC clearly misquoted Trump (which is obviously wrong), in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this 'story', more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. In my opinion however, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading than the BBC's. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to fight: "...fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". Trump used the term "fight" twenty times, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. The BBC have apologised and both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet' is self evidently nonsense. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. They are not motivated by the national interest, or a quest for truth (neither is Trump - a firehose of BS). For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him exactly where to go, shows a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...