Jump to content

Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?

daizie

By daizie
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

LegalEagle-ish

LegalEagle-ish

Posted
Posted

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

LegalEagle-ish

LegalEagle-ish

Posted
Posted

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      GALA 2026

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Yes, that compromise is in not extending the event to two weekends, and keeping it to the one currently.  Yes, I am getting that too, but just go anyway. I intend to.  I will talk to FOPR, and see if there is any interest for a petition from those going to the consultation tm. We just need some volunteers to get together and do the leg work. I've done political party canvassing before, and so can organise a ward by ward schedule. I think it's fair to say that any goodwill some of us had towards working with Gala has gone with this proposed expansion. They are not the same people that started the event with We Are the Fair. At least one of those people actually lived next to the park. The people running things now have no connection to the park or local area and quite frankly are taking the p*** now. Might be worth officially demanding to know where the money the council gets from the festival is actually spent as well. 
    • Cluck'ed
      Chern Re-opening Soon…….

      By Cluck'ed · Posted

      It's a fantastic little place  
    • malumbu
      PM surely as a country we are better than this (Reform setting the agenda on immigration)

      By malumbu · Posted

      Sadly we need young people from developing countries with higher birth rates to do the work that Brits wont do, including many jobs in health and social care.  How you square this with minimum wages to get work visas I don't know.  A different subject for another thread.   Shortage of skilled workers is another topic.  We could return to the fact that young people from Europe no longer come to the UK for a limited time, to do both skilled and unskilled jobs, but that would bring us back to Brexit and the crazy decision we made as a nation. Some nice analysis by Sky News, tend not to use them as a rule but was surprised by the quality of this piece: https://news.sky.com/story/how-many-illegal-migrants-are-in-britain-the-key-numbers-driving-the-immigration-debate-13428405  
    • beansprout
      Vacant Grove Vale Warehouse

      By beansprout · Posted

      Would be good if they turned it into something that is social/community driven for housing - old and young mix together. Let’s face it, dearth of social anything relating to housing… if that.could  be combined with say, work area and gardening and cafe for all, everyone wins.. Dream on.. yea… certainly don’t need more large supermarkets, kitchen stores, Argos etc… Haven’t had time to look at plans…  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...