Jump to content

Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?


Recommended Posts

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

TLS is a man who wanted to select where to house his family on the basis that the skin colour of the neighborhood defines its criminality.


What the hell is going on in the UK that people think it's okay to say that? I mean really, what is going on in people's heads? WTF? There's no room for that in society, regardless of a forum.


TLS just sent me a PM too, but it make me ask myself how crazy he is? His views are absolutely noxious. He slanders 4 billion people by saying that skin colour defines criminality, and then says he's offended? He's offended?


If people think that's a 'lover not a fighter' then I despair. There's no more value in that observation than in the residents of Buchenwald saying that the Kommandant down at the camp made a lovely cup of tea.


It's sick and its twisted. The fact that it's Tunbridge Wells bumptiousness doesn't make it cute or cuddly.


As for being a liar, guess what, it didn't end on a PM it went straight to the thread. This the the spat where TLS brought up the issue of my 'safety' and 'suffering the consequences'. I actually asked him "live on line" whether he had just threatened me. I didn't feel that the observation was bad form because it came into the threads.


As per usual TLS swerved it, but where I come from the question "do you want to come down and meet my mates" is absolutely explicit. It's school playground viciousness. It's saying 'you don't disagree just with me, but with my back-up, and you're going to meet them.'.


I also remember with absolute clarity the screechy harpies who try to get off on a 'technicality' like they're negotiating with teacher. The ones who don't apologise for nasty acts, the ones who yowl 'prove it, prooove it', because they think they're smart. Other people are absolutely entitled to their own interpretation. But both myself and TLS knew what he meant, and so do most people.

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

Huguenot, it just goes to page 1 which is fairly lame - can you post a link to the interesting bit pls cos I don't want to trawl through it all.


I agree with you by the way, I think he was totally obnoxious and definitely rascist. Just cos he is shagging a black woman doesn't mean he can be as rascist as he likes and say he's not.


I was a bit shocked when he said you'd made it up - you don't need to make anything up - he hangs himself without any need for others to add stuff.

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

Huge,


Leaving aside the fact you explicitly said that the supposed threat 'was by PM' earlier - which is never was (an unusual slip of the tongue for someone who is ususally so on the ball with 'the facts'.


Leaving that aside, I've read it, and I'm afraid I don't see what you see, because it isn't there.


Talk of 'safety' is specifically about you getting to say whatever you want on here without fear of retribution because you you are (allegedly) in the with in crowd (whoever they are)


'Suffering the consequences' is about you (allegedly) being able to preach the wonders of a racially diverse population but never having to live with the consequences of the problems it (allegedly) creates.


I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

And...


I can't find the 'come and meet my mates' part either (unless I've missed it)


Tony talks about his mates - his point being that they are are actually ethnically diverse unlike most of the (allegedly) namby-pamby white liberal wishy-washy guardianistas posting about a rainbow utopia on here.


He also suggests that should you go and meet people (he offers to pay your air fare, which is generous) in other non-white countries whose alleged cultural identity has allegedly been eroded as ours allegedly has here - and hear what they might have to say about it - you might also hear a robust response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...