Jump to content

Does anyone else miss TLS's + Bigbadwolf's posts?


Recommended Posts

I'd swear quids said that in the same way that Voronin would after the ball stopped dead in front of an empty net and he scores the winner in Big Cup final - "I can't believe that was just left there!!!"


Anyway I thought you were dying sick

I'd swear quids said that in the same way that Voronin would after the ball stopped dead in front of an empty net and he scores the winner in Big Cup final - "I can't believe that was just left there!!!"


Anyway I thought you were dying sick

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...just a

> different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than

> the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out

> by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their

> families away from any school that became 'too

> diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent

> darling?".



Wow ????! That was brave...well done you! *sees ???? in a different light*



You too Michael Palaeologus...err sorry I meant Chief Bhuna...I can't argue with you...logical stuff

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...just a

> different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than

> the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out

> by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their

> families away from any school that became 'too

> diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent

> darling?".



Wow ????! That was brave...well done you! *sees ???? in a different light*



You too Michael Palaeologus...err sorry I meant Chief Bhuna...I can't argue with you...logical stuff

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but seeing as he basically withdrew it 2 minutes

> later Ladymuck, does it still count?



Can't see that he withdrew it...nope...I've looked... (are we looking at the same stuff:-S?)

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> but seeing as he basically withdrew it 2 minutes

> later Ladymuck, does it still count?



Can't see that he withdrew it...nope...I've looked... (are we looking at the same stuff:-S?)

QUIDS:


"He is. I apologise, I'm sure Hugenot has been warned about stuff.


My vitriol was largely in response to Hugenot's but contains some truths too - spoilt by my spleen."


Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking qualification

QUIDS:


"He is. I apologise, I'm sure Hugenot has been warned about stuff.


My vitriol was largely in response to Hugenot's but contains some truths too - spoilt by my spleen."


Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking qualification

  Quote
My vitriol was largely in response to Hugenot's but contains some truths too - spoilt by my spleen.


That is not a withdrawal.


Michael's post was good, although a subject shouldn't be swept away just because it has come up before (except william roase, buggies, curry houses, and M&S).

  Quote
My vitriol was largely in response to Hugenot's but contains some truths too - spoilt by my spleen.


That is not a withdrawal.


Michael's post was good, although a subject shouldn't be swept away just because it has come up before (except william roase, buggies, curry houses, and M&S).

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking

> qualification


Sean, we are definitely not on the same wave-length (or planet even?)...my comment was in response to:


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...just a

> different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than

> the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out

> by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their

> families away from any school that became 'too

> diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent

> darling?".



Anyway, I'm not so impressed with him now that he banked that "100" again...the sly puss...;-)


*sulks*

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not a withdrawal but certainly a stonking

> qualification


Sean, we are definitely not on the same wave-length (or planet even?)...my comment was in response to:


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...just a

> different and less 'liberal' (hahaha) view than

> the pious, hideously white, Guardian views put out

> by smug, affluent bourgeois who would whisk their

> families away from any school that became 'too

> diverse' quicker than you can say "How about Kent

> darling?".



Anyway, I'm not so impressed with him now that he banked that "100" again...the sly puss...;-)


*sulks*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...