Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Steve T is right, many of the guys do have to buy their own kit as the standard issue stuff is such poor quality. For example, my husband is issued with boots that retail at around ?15. Bearing in mind they spend 99% of their time in these boots, tabbing, on exercise etc. If he wore what was issued he'd have endless foot, ankle, problems etc which would require costly medical treatment and physio.


Rather than cut TA spending, in my view the MOD should slash the amount of civil service staff they employ, many of whom can't do the job they were employed to do. A few weeks ago I found myself whole heartedly agreeing with Liam Fox who said that we have an army of around 99,000 who are 'supported' by approx 85,000 civil servants. In Nelson's day, he had an army of far greater numbers, with a handful of staff at Horseguards.

David Carnell wrote:- Villagers tend to object to tanks driving through their market squares.



Is that the only option, a foot patrol or a tank?


Perhaps an investment into armoured cars ...........covered in Disney characters,

just for the sensitivities of some poor old villagers.


I don't think I would be greatly influenced by village life if I were in charge, my men and their safety would be my soul concern.

I think my wider point referred to hearts and minds, Steve. Are you trying to be obtuse?


If you rampaging through towns/villages in armour clad tanks or APVs or even a Land Rover what happens is you fail to engage with the local populace. Through them you can gain valuable HUMINT and build bonds with the communities we are meant to be helping. Hide behind 6-inch steel plate, talk to no-one and shoot anything that moves and you'll soon find the local population turns against you.


And then things are a whole lot worse than they were before....

Well there's two ways to explore that safety issue I guess. Yours, SteveT is an escalation in weaponry, but the guys on the ground clearly feel that reducing the local's inclination to attack could also contribute.


History would have it that conciliation is usually the most successful path. But hey, some people just like to shoot guns and be threatening.

The safety and security of your men and women is the paramount concern of any commander.


However, the need to keep onside the local static population is essential so you do all possible to lower the impact of operations on them


Human Terrain Mapping is how it is achieved and HTT's are deployed with frontline troops.


Tactical patience is also being used...this reduces the impact of local actions at the strategic level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
    • They’re convenient. They’re fun to ride. From ED, getting a Lime to Brixton and then jumping on the tube is probably the fastest way to get into central London. There’s a reason they’re  popular.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...