Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Steve T is right, many of the guys do have to buy their own kit as the standard issue stuff is such poor quality. For example, my husband is issued with boots that retail at around ?15. Bearing in mind they spend 99% of their time in these boots, tabbing, on exercise etc. If he wore what was issued he'd have endless foot, ankle, problems etc which would require costly medical treatment and physio.


Rather than cut TA spending, in my view the MOD should slash the amount of civil service staff they employ, many of whom can't do the job they were employed to do. A few weeks ago I found myself whole heartedly agreeing with Liam Fox who said that we have an army of around 99,000 who are 'supported' by approx 85,000 civil servants. In Nelson's day, he had an army of far greater numbers, with a handful of staff at Horseguards.

David Carnell wrote:- Villagers tend to object to tanks driving through their market squares.



Is that the only option, a foot patrol or a tank?


Perhaps an investment into armoured cars ...........covered in Disney characters,

just for the sensitivities of some poor old villagers.


I don't think I would be greatly influenced by village life if I were in charge, my men and their safety would be my soul concern.

I think my wider point referred to hearts and minds, Steve. Are you trying to be obtuse?


If you rampaging through towns/villages in armour clad tanks or APVs or even a Land Rover what happens is you fail to engage with the local populace. Through them you can gain valuable HUMINT and build bonds with the communities we are meant to be helping. Hide behind 6-inch steel plate, talk to no-one and shoot anything that moves and you'll soon find the local population turns against you.


And then things are a whole lot worse than they were before....

Well there's two ways to explore that safety issue I guess. Yours, SteveT is an escalation in weaponry, but the guys on the ground clearly feel that reducing the local's inclination to attack could also contribute.


History would have it that conciliation is usually the most successful path. But hey, some people just like to shoot guns and be threatening.

The safety and security of your men and women is the paramount concern of any commander.


However, the need to keep onside the local static population is essential so you do all possible to lower the impact of operations on them


Human Terrain Mapping is how it is achieved and HTT's are deployed with frontline troops.


Tactical patience is also being used...this reduces the impact of local actions at the strategic level.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They plan to close the Mount Pleasant Office, absolute and utter madnesss
    • We are sadly saddled with the three stooges till July 2029 because they have such a far reaching majority, that is the problem when you give a party that level of support.  The ship was being turned around by the last Administration and given all their faults, errors, misdemeanours its not surprising that that got and probably deservedly so out of Office.  But if what has just happened over the past 100+ days since the new Administration took power, we are in for a very bumpy ride and peoples lives will ALL be affected. They say they champion the poor, well all they've done so far by taking away the winter fuel allowance (not eligible for it) and increasing employers national insurance, as sure as eggs is eggs, prices will increase and that hits everyone in the pocket, including the poorest in society. You can only shake the money tree so often, after which time it's Empty. What that means is the cost of providing benefits increases, where does the money then come from.  To then take on the farmers who feed part of the economy is utter madness, because if they blockade food supplies then people will go hungry, not necessarily starve. You don't shoot the hand that feeds you.  Their is enough written about the three stooges, Starmer, Reeves and Rayner, I have no idea if they are supposed "communists", but what I have seen is that free speech is being eroded, that can never be good for a democracy, where people are scared to speak out.  How does all this change, the people will eventually have had enough and rise up against the Govt. It has to happen eventually. Even is Starmer went you are left with Reeves and Rayner. Personally O don't trust either, it will be more of "do as I say, not as I do".  
    • Thanks for the invite, although most people will be at work or at school. It's a Monday morning...
    • Budgens on Half Moon Lane
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...