Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


So for some time I felt that this matter is slightly unfair. Basically if you work a 5 day week your annual holiday is worked out by 28 divided by 5 which gives the 5 day worker a total of 5.6 weeks holidays. The way the holiday is calculated for someone who works a 6 day week is 28 divided by 6 giving someone who works an extra 52 day's a year a total of 4.6 weeks which is less than a 5 day worker.


I would be interested to hear peoples feed back on this as I think it is slightly unjust. I work a 6 day week and an average of 55 hrs a week which is quite a few hours more than the 48hr week.


Let me know what you think and for those who support this I have done an online petition to the government to look into it. so if you can sign and share that would be greatly appreciated.


https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/110899


Also any advice is most welcome.


Regards


Chris

I don't understand your calculation. Does everyone get 28 days but you are saying it unfair because it proportionally less time off relative to days worked? Or, are you saying that people on a 5 day week actually get more absolute (total number of) days off?

You're entitled to an extra 8 days holiday a year if your job requires you to work bank holidays. Thus if you have a 20 day allocation it becomes 28 days. I think he means people who 5 days get more time off relative to hours worked.


Frankly I don't have a lot of sympathy with the OP. I work at least 55 hours a week in a five day a week job that includes bank holidays, evenings and weekends, and I think the 28 days holiday is pretty good. I've been with my job long enough now that I actually get more than that, but 5.6 weeks a year is, IMO, pretty decent.


If you aren't happy with it then is there any reason why you are unable to change job or renegotiate your position? The simple fact is most people don't work a six day schedule; if you feel you're a special case then you need to take that to your boss, but I doubt that the govt is going to be interested.

I'm not really sure what to make of this. Surely, you are compensated for the extra day / hours through your pay package. I also technically work a 5 day a week job and put in 55+ hours with a fair amount of regularity. Time off for me is 25 days plus bank holidays. I know plenty of people with 20 days in the UK. My colleagues in the US get a max of 20 days with seniority and my colleagues in France get 30. My husband gets 32 plus bank holidays in the UK.


Its just all part of the job market and total package you are negotiating. Do you only make proportionally more money than your 5 day a week colleagues?


Good luck with your negotiations but I agree with others that the government isn't going to intervene in private sector pay package negotiations like the way you are asking.

I think there has been some confusion here. The OP isn't talking about private negotiations. This relates to the statutory entitlement which is 5.6 weeks per year which equals 28 days based on a five day week. Bank holidays are included. The legislation expressly sets out that there shall be no proportional increase in the number of days paid holiday for those working 6 days.


I suspect that when the legislation was written it was assumed that the majority of 6th day working was overtime ie that you can choose to simply not work the 6th without penalty, thereby only needing 'holiday' on 5 days to provide a whole week off.

What the OP is asking is that if the 6th day is part of the standard week, then the 5.6 weeks entitlement should include the extra day.

AbDabs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think there has been some confusion here. The OP

> isn't talking about private negotiations. This

> relates to the statutory entitlement which is 5.6

> weeks per year which equals 28 days based on a

> five day week. Bank holidays are included. The

> legislation expressly sets out that there shall be

> no proportional increase in the number of days

> paid holiday for those working 6 days.

>

> I suspect that when the legislation was written it

> was assumed that the majority of 6th day working

> was overtime ie that you can choose to simply not

> work the 6th without penalty, thereby only needing

> 'holiday' on 5 days to provide a whole week off.

> What the OP is asking is that if the 6th day is

> part of the standard week, then the 5.6 weeks

> entitlement should include the extra day.


Well, no it IS private negotiations that are needed here - if you've agreed to work six days a week at the same holiday allocation that a five day rota would get then that's your problem. If you think you should have more holiday then take it up with your employer - the govt (rightly or wrongly and that's a different conversation) isn't going to be interested. The fact that the legislation is specific demonstrates that.


An employer isn't going to give you more than the law requires unless a) they want to incentivise/reward their staff or b) their staff persuade them to. Either way this explicitly is a situation that will only be resolved through private negotiation because I can't see any major party getting involved. Again, the moral dimension of that is a separate discussion.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If

> you think you should have more holiday then take

> it up with your employer - the govt (rightly or

> wrongly and that's a different conversation) isn't

> going to be interested. The fact that the

> legislation is specific demonstrates that.

>

>

If you look at the OP's link to the petition it relates to the statutory entitlement not a particular individual/employment situation.


Mick Mac - the reason I refer to the 5.6 weeks is that the 28 days is calculated from the entitlement to 5.6 weeks within the legislation. This stems from the original 1 week in 13 from the Working time regulations which has since been enhanced

I think we all get that. However, people can and often are given more time off than the statutory minimum.


A 6 day work week with contracted hours of more than 40 is not standard. So for non-standard contracts, one would expect the terms to be negotiated and agreed specifically-- that includes all benefits and compensation. Creating guidelines for all contract elements for all non-standard working contracts isn't practical or necessary.


Its not like the statutory minimum is currently something that employers strictly adhere to as a max. It is something that employers extend as part of an incentive package for recruitment and therefore can be negotiated privately.

AbDabs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you look at the OP's link to the petition it

> relates to the statutory entitlement not a

> particular individual/employment situation.



Yes, agreed. And I repeat, the government have plainly already made it clear that they feel the situation is adequately legislated. They aren't going to revisit this anytime soon. People in the OPs position are free to take this up with their bosses - and I think they should - but expecting the govt to intervene is unrealistic.


FWIW I fully support anyone who works hard and feels they are worth more holiday, better wages etc. I don't think the OP is being unreasonable on wanting better T+C on their contract; but as things currently stand the law isn't with them on this. Personally I'm not sure what I think about this yet - I know a number of people who work six days but almost all are running their own business essentially. I would never ask someone to work those hours but don't object to others doing it so long as it's an informed choice made voluntarily. But I do feel if you do it you're responsible for making sure it's worth it. 28 days holiday is still a decent amount.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You get 28 days holiday per year - that's whether

> you work 5 days or 6 days a week.

>

> why convert the holiday to number of weeks off -

> this just confuses things


I suppose if you want to go off to Greece for 2 weeks you have to take

12 days instead of 10.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Errr could it be because of the noise pollution coming from it perhaps? You may not be able to hear it where you live but anyone on the Dulwich Village side of Lordship Lane all the way to beyond Brockwell Park is being disturbed by it - the sound wash from it is huge and that's a lot of people. As I said before we know people who live nearer to Brockwell Park to us and they say it is unbearable.   To be fair the Emirates moved to a piece of wasteland between railway tracks so it actually in a less densely populated area now and the council actually goes out of their way to try to mitigate the impact on local residents and yes, other than the concerts, you could hear a pin drop on matchdays! 😉 
    • Chains moving in is a sure sign that LL is heading for a fall. They are parasites, waiting for the independents to be successful and then, in partnership with rapacious landlords, they move in and force out those very businesses who have created the market they then seek to exploit. They replace a lively diversity with a bland and predictable offering. Then, when a downturn arrives, they move out, leaving boarded up premises and charity shops. Independent businesses who have worked hard to make a success of their efforts will try to see out hard times as they’ve invested so much. Chains look only at the bottom line and think nothing of closing branches. Chains are liable also to expand too fast, be managed badly and then collapse. Think of Brick House being forced out by Gail’s, the closure of White Stuff (although that chain was replaced by another) and JoJo Maman Bebe. . Sadly, I fear that will be the future of LL. 
    • It’s the impact the festival has on the community, the people living next door to the park who have to endure the thumping music and worse. Then there’s the park and the state it’s left in and the wildlife, especially nesting birds. All the roads going down Denmark Hill towards the park were closed off and roads off half moon lane and going up towards West Norwood closed off with wardens at each end, who were paid by Lambeth Council to stand there for the 4 days.  The festival made the news channels and interviews suggested most of the people attending weren’t fron the local area but places like Ireland and Scotland.  I live a 20 minute walk from the park and could hear the thumping music all day and night. Also the wind certainly carried the smell of drugs to my garden! For 4 days I couldn’t believe how strong it was. 
    • Emirates Stadium is  >60,00 but they tend to be very quiet 🙂 Jokes aside though, it's a case in point. Highbury was <40,000 and was 300M up the road, so there are definitely Islington residents who used to live half a mile from a fairly big football stadium, and now live right by a massive one. One that holds rock/pop concerts too accomodating 70,000 fans whether they like ot or not.   40% of Islington households are in social housing so regardless of when they moved their current homes, they may have had little say in exactly where they are housed.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...