Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We now 'like', and countries will engage with, America. The youth culture of Black americans can identify with politics, (i'm sick to death of 'Black history week' being only about slavery, not necessarily the only part of a peoples history!). Plus he outted the real 'evil doers' from the white house.

The pope, mother Teresa, that lady from 'Kids club', no one else could have done so much in such a short space of time.

It is funny that all of you said "it is too early" implying that he should get it at some point (and only the timing is wrong). It is mind-boggling that he was nominated in the first place since the nominations had to be submitted by the 1st of February 2009 (only days after he was in the white house).

Here is a very interesting article about that Times

...extracted from the above article provided by Crona:

"The question constantly asked by Sacha Baron Cohen?s subversive Ali G character keeps coming back to me: ?Is it ?cos I is black?? And the answer in this case is probably yes..."


When the prize was announced, my immediate thought was that this was probably a token gesture based on Obama's ethnicity...I in fact said so to my husband (who happens to be black)...but couldn't summon sufficient courage to post this somewhat negative and unattractive view on the Forum. The above article has now changed this and I feel strangely relieved knowing that I am not the only who entertained such a thought. Did anyone else?


If this is the case, then Obama should return the purported "prize".

How would he know it's because he's black?


The Nobel committee state that the prize was given "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples", which certainly have been hallmarks of his Presidency so far - but agree with previous posters, in that these have yet to have had much material impact.


But I read at the weekend that the Nobel committee are now giving prizes as an indication of 'potential' and supporting current efforts, as much as achievement.


Still, did you see the shortlist? Morgan Tsvangirai, Sima Samar, civil rights campaigners in China and other countries... Some looked like some very impressive people, who had been doing their thing for many years.

It wasn't so long ago that a Nobel prize winner would have worked for a lifetime to achieve such acclaim.


Shoving this prestigious award in his hands must be one of the most embarrassing parts of his short political life.


I don't suppose he could refuse it, but he obviously felt uncomfortable about it.


Like Ladymuck said it seems we gave it to him for being the first black president of the US.


When many others have proven track records of doing great things for mankind, this makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize process.

  • 1 month later...

Seeing as he was awarded it when escalation was at that point his stated intention I suspect nthin would have changed.


I think it was mote to do with bringing the USA back in to the family of nations and multilateral approaches.

Utterly necessary if we are all to make progress on today's issues, and the fact that he was awarded it on such small scraps is a reflecting of just how aghast the planet was at the autarchical policies of the last 'orrible lot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The name has got a 50s feel about it so in my mind it’s for older people who have very specific concerns. Nothing wrong with that. 
    • There is also one for Goose green https://www.police.uk/pu/your-area/metropolitan-police-service/goose-green/?yourlocalpolicingteam=your-team Disclaimer: only passing on what I have found by searching. No involvement in organising it.  
    • It is a challenge.  These sorts of services are increasingly expensive to deliver as fewer and fewer people use them.  Most people don't want to have to go back to using their lunch hour to queue up at the bank or Post Office.  So the options  are - reduce the service, make it more expensive or the tax payer subsidises it.  
    • Surely increasing profits are not the reason? It's more about  preventing massive losses? You can't keep things going at vast expense because a few people still use them. We would still be in the stone age. There are always going to be some people who find it hard to use "modern" technology (which has been going for decades). I would have thought the answer was for those people to learn how to do the things they need to do? I'm sure lots of help must be available?  I'm one of the ancient ones, and around the end of the nineties I went on a free course to be taught how to go online and use the internet. It was quite a steep learning curve, but so is learning anything new. So in previous years was learning to use a PC and word processing. So was learning Excel and spreadsheets.  If you need to use something, you have to learn how to do it! Some people may not have the mental  capacity to do this, but in that case surely they will be getting support in other areas of their daily life already? And as regards the possible  closure of the crown post office (note - possible) we don't know what alternative arrangements may be made should this happen, so it seems a bit premature to be protesting about it at this point.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...