Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've had a f*cking hell of a week, and it's not yet done. I need a beer. I'm getting the feck out of this office and heading home, from where i shall be wandering to either the Palmerston or the Bishop for a pint or 8 and perhaps a whisky to finish. Yes, that bad.


Won't see you there, due to my blind-drunkeness.

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > > Daizie, you minx! You could have left some

> for

> > the rest of us!

>

> I'll always save some for you, LM. You know that.



Hmmppph! No good sweet-talking your way out of it now...


* "drops" eggs onto Brum's car on way home*

rcmacf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, I wouldn't like to be facing a googlie come

> the final wicket. (I'd like to point out, as a

> Scot, that I have no idea what that means).

>

> I've never verbalised it, but as a mix of initials

> and surname I guess it's "Arceemackeff"

>

> Yes, to previous enquirer, most call me Rob, but

> why run with the pack?


Ha! So I was right with my name guess then.

Shame I can't make the pub tonight :(

Another time perhaps rcmacf??!

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Letting people know that Legal pm'd him.



Oh sorry darling...I thought it was because I referred to Legal as a "hussy"!


Yes...well, I'm not having it...


*switches to other single men thread to check on Legal*

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OOps, sorry guys! I thought you were telling

> tales on someone LM, I think I need that drink.



No worries Tillie...(it's my dreadful sense of humour - catches people out every time...hey ho..)...you have that drink


(*winks at TillieTrotter*)

rcmacf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've had a @#$%& hell of a week, and it's not yet

> done. I need a beer. I'm getting the feck out of

> this office and heading home, from where i shall

> be wandering to either the Palmerston or the

> Bishop for a pint or 8 and perhaps a whisky to

> finish. Yes, that bad.

>

> Won't see you there, due to my blind-drunkeness.



So, Rob. I'm curious - were you joined in the pub last night by a bevy of gorgeous forumites?...

In a word, no. It was not like the attached. Was in the Bishop (as the actress said to...) then up to the Lodge for a few too many. Ended up chatting with an utterly delightful 40/50 something lady who was amazed that i was just chatting with her, and not chatting her up. She was also determined to impress on me that she had 3 kids and so could not possibly be of any interest to me. People can be a bit odd.


May be about tonight, too, though. This weather shall have me stray not too far from the nest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No photograph taken and no video evidence of anyone approaching or ringing my doorbell all morning. I have made a complaint to EVRI, but just in case anyone has taken in or found some James Wellbeloved Senior dry catfood on their doorstep ... I am at the South Circular/Horniman end of Underhill.
    • I may have missed it, but I don't think anyone has made that argument have they?  I don't know, but suspect they've figured the costs of cancelling at this late stage are greater than the costs of losing another legal challenge. I agree that if so, it's putting commercial considerations over legal process.
    • Honestly don't know what Lambeth are thinking - they should consider their reputation, loss of public trust, legal challenges and findings of maladministration. Perhaps they have and don't care. It stinks of commercial bias and contempt for the legal process and public.  
    • If the argument was 'all councils are bad' that would be clearly true, but as much of the debate has been about 'once a council is elected, what it does is right and mandated' I think there is greater merit in using this as a debating point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...